Usefulness and diagnostic value of the NEMA parameter combined with other selected bedside tests for prediction of difficult intubation

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 132-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Torres ◽  
Marcin Błoński ◽  
Łukasz Pietrzyk ◽  
Małgorzata Piasecka-Twaróg ◽  
Ryszard Maciejewski ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Shiga ◽  
Zen’ichiro Wajima ◽  
Tetsuo Inoue ◽  
Atsuhiro Sakamoto

The objective of this study was to systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of bedside tests for predicting difficult intubation in patients with no airway pathology. Thirty-five studies (50,760 patients) were selected from electronic databases. The overall incidence of difficult intubation was 5.8% (95% confidence interval, 4.5-7.5%). Screening tests included the Mallampati oropharyngeal classification, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening, and Wilson risk score. Each test yielded poor to moderate sensitivity (20-62%) and moderate to fair specificity (82-97%). The most useful bedside test for prediction was found to be a combination of the Mallampati classification and thyromental distance (positive likelihood ratio, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.9). Currently available screening tests for difficult intubation have only poor to moderate discriminative power when used alone. Combinations of tests add some incremental diagnostic value in comparison to the value of each test alone. The clinical value of bedside screening tests for predicting difficult intubation remains limited.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Shristi Shah

Background: Prevalence of difficult intubation is estimated as 3 -18% during routine anesthesia. There are various bedside tests to predict the difficult intubation, like Mallampati test, Thyromental distance, Sternomental distance and mouth opening. However, the prevalence and prediction in Nepalese population is still not estimated. So this study is to see the prevalence and to compare the efficacy of airway parameters to predict the difficult intubation in Nepalese population.Methods: A prospective study was done to estimate the prevalence and prediction of difficult intubation in Nepalese population. During six months period, 182 patients who were undergoing routine surgery under General anesthesia were included in the study. Mallampati grading, thyromental distance, mouth opening and sternomental distance were recorded in preoperative assessment. Cormack and Lehane grading were done during intubation and Grade I and II are considered as easy intubation/ laryngoscopy and III and IV are considered as difficult intubation.Results: The prevalence of difficult intubation was 4.9%. Sensitivity of different tests were as follows; Mallampati test – 55%, thyromental distance – 33%, mouth opening – 22% and sternomental distance – 11%. The Specificity of the test as Mallampati test – 98%, thyromental distance – 89%, mouth opening – 96% and sternomental distance – 97%. So the Mallampati test is more sensitive and specific among the tests done.Conclusion: This prospective study shows that the prevalence of difficult intubation is not different in Nepalese population and the bedside predictors also are good tests that could be continued in our population.Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal 2015; 2(1): 17-20


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stalin Vinayagam ◽  
Sangeeta Dhanger ◽  
SumanLata Gupta ◽  
PrasannaUdupi Bidkar ◽  
LeninBabu Elakkumanan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-221
Author(s):  
Bharti R Rajani ◽  
◽  
Mitali B Saraswala ◽  
Shobhana C Gupta ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gerald Fine ◽  
Azorides R. Morales

For years the separation of carcinoma and sarcoma and the subclassification of sarcomas has been based on the appearance of the tumor cells and their microscopic growth pattern and information derived from certain histochemical and special stains. Although this method of study has produced good agreement among pathologists in the separation of carcinoma from sarcoma, it has given less uniform results in the subclassification of sarcomas. There remain examples of neoplasms of different histogenesis, the classification of which is questionable because of similar cytologic and growth patterns at the light microscopic level; i.e. amelanotic melanoma versus carcinoma and occasionally sarcoma, sarcomas with an epithelial pattern of growth simulating carcinoma, histologically similar mesenchymal tumors of different histogenesis (histiocytoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma, lytic osteogenic sarcoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma), and myxomatous mesenchymal tumors of diverse histogenesis (myxoid rhabdo and liposarcomas, cardiac myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, etc.)


1957 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry J. Culver ◽  
William V. McDermott ◽  
Chester M. Jones

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document