scholarly journals Exploratory study of VVZ-149, a novel analgesic molecule, in the affective component of acute postoperative pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery

2022 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 110576
Author(s):  
Srdjan S. Nedeljkovic ◽  
Inkyung Song ◽  
Xiaodong Bao ◽  
Jose L. Zeballos ◽  
Darin J. Correll ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
L Brown ◽  
M Gray ◽  
B Griffiths ◽  
M Jones ◽  
A Madhavan ◽  
...  

Introduction Enhanced recovery programmes are established as an essential part of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Optimal pain management is central to the success of an enhanced recovery programme and is acknowledged to be an important patient reported outcome measure. A variety of analgesia strategies are employed in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery ranging from patient-controlled analgesia to local anaesthetic wound infiltration catheters. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal analgesia strategy in this cohort of patients. The LapCoGesic study aimed to explore differences in analgesia strategies employed for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to assess whether this variation in practice has an impact on patient-reported and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken over a two-month period. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain scores at 24 hours. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22. Results A total of 103 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included in the study. Thoracic epidural was used in 4 (3.9%) patients, spinal diamorphine in 56 (54.4%) patients and patient-controlled analgesia in 77 (74.8%) patients. The use of thoracic epidural and spinal diamorphine were associated with lower pain scores on day 1 postoperatively (P < 0.05). The use of patient-controlled analgesia was associated with significantly higher postoperative pain scores and pain severity. Discussion Postoperative pain is managed in a variable manner in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, which has an impact on patient reported outcomes of pain scores and pain severity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1617-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacquelenn Marie Stuhldreher ◽  
Michel Adamina ◽  
Alex Konopacka ◽  
Karen Brady ◽  
Conor P. Delaney

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara Bree ◽  
Orla Moriarty ◽  
Daniel C. Broom ◽  
John P. Kelly ◽  
Michelle Roche ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1290-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah S. Keller ◽  
Bridget O. Ermlich ◽  
Nicholas Schiltz ◽  
Bradley J. Champagne ◽  
Harry L. Reynolds ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 113-114
Author(s):  
B. Fort Pelay ◽  
L. Castelltort ◽  
D. Amorós ◽  
M. Rueda ◽  
D. Bande ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Jennifer D Silinsky ◽  
Jorge E Marcet ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Swapna U Karkare ◽  
Drishti R Shah ◽  
...  

Aim: Evaluate safety/efficacy of intravenous meloxicam in a colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Methods: Adults undergoing primary open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery with bowel resection and/or anastomosis received meloxicam IV 30 mg (n = 27) or placebo (n = 28) once daily beginning 30 min before surgery. Results: Adverse events: meloxicam IV, 85%; placebo, 93%. Adverse events commonly associated with opioids: 41 versus 61% – including nausea (33 vs 50%), vomiting (19 vs 18%) and ileus (4 vs 18%). Wound healing satisfaction scores (physician-rated), clinical laboratory findings and vital signs were similar in both groups. No anastomotic leaks were reported. Opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, length of stay and times to first bowel sound, first flatus and first bowel movement were significantly lower with meloxicam IV versus placebo. Most subjects (>92%) were satisfied with postoperative pain medication. Conclusion: Meloxicam IV was generally well tolerated and associated with decreased opioid consumption, lower resource utilization and functional benefits. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03323385 (ClinicalTrials.gov)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document