scholarly journals Novel bilayer dissolving microneedle arrays with concentrated PLGA nano-microparticles for targeted intradermal delivery: Proof of concept

2017 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalit K. Vora ◽  
Ryan F. Donnelly ◽  
Eneko Larrañeta ◽  
Patricia González-Vázquez ◽  
Raghu Raj Singh Thakur ◽  
...  
Pharmaceutics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Permana ◽  
McCrudden ◽  
Donnelly

Conventional oral administration of antifilariasis drugs results in nonspecific targeting of the drugs and the intradermal delivery of nanoparticles with sizes of <100 nm could be used to improve lymphatic uptake. This study investigated the combination of nanosuspension and dissolving microneedles (MN-NS) as an alternative intradermal delivery approach for the delivery of antifilariasis drugs, namely doxycycline, albendazole, and ivermectin. NS were fabricated and optimized using a bottom-up technique. The NS were then incorporated into the MN arrays. The optimized NS were <100 nm in diameter. Furthermore, MN-NS had suitable mechanical strength and insertion capabilities. The dermatokinetic study revealed that the delivery of drugs into the dermis of excised neonatal porcine skin by MNs was significantly higher than that from a needle-free patch, with 29.29 ± 4.65%, 31.54 ± 5.35%, and 34.54 ± 4.98% of doxycycline, albendazole sulfoxide, and ivermectin retained in the dermis after 24 h. The results presented here serve as proof of concept for the significant enhancement of drug retention times in the dermis, following their formulation into NS and delivery via MN. Leading on from these studies, future work must investigate in vivo lymphatic pharmacokinetic profiling of drugs formulated into NS, in a suitable animal model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 2439-2450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman M.N. Hamdan ◽  
Ismaiel A. Tekko ◽  
Kyle B. Matchett ◽  
Luis G. Arnaut ◽  
Claudia S. Silva ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emrullah Korkmaz ◽  
Emily E. Friedrich ◽  
Mohamed H. Ramadan ◽  
Geza Erdos ◽  
Alicia R. Mathers ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan F. Donnelly ◽  
Desmond I. J. Morrow ◽  
Paul A. McCarron ◽  
A. David Woolfson ◽  
Anthony Morrissey ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bekir Bediz ◽  
Emrullah Korkmaz ◽  
Rakesh Khilwani ◽  
Cara Donahue ◽  
Geza Erdos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 105469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismaiel A. Tekko ◽  
Andi Dian Permana ◽  
Lalitkumar Vora ◽  
Taher Hatahet ◽  
Helen O. McCarthy ◽  
...  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharif Abdelghany ◽  
Ismaiel A. Tekko ◽  
Lalitkumar Vora ◽  
Eneko Larrañeta ◽  
Andi Dian Permana ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to evaluate the intradermal delivery of curcumin utilising poly(vinylalcohol) (PVA)-based microneedles loaded with curcumin nanosuspension (CU-NS). Nanoprecipitation was used to formulate the CU-NS which was then incorporated into PVA microneedles arrays consisting of 11 × 11 microneedles of conical shape, measuring 900 µm in height and with 300 µm base diameter. The nanosuspension particle size was 520 ± 40 nm, with a polydispersity of 0.27 ± 0.02 using sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) as a stabiliser. In vitro dissolution studies in 10% w/v Tween 80 showed that the CU-NS dissolved significantly faster than unmodified curcumin powder, with 34% released from the CU-NS, compared to 16% from the curcumin powder after 48 h. The CU-NS-loaded microneedles (CU-MN) were able to withstand a compression force of 32 N for 30 s. Moreover, these microneedles were able to penetrate excised neonatal porcine skin to a depth of 500 µm, dissolved completely in the skin within 60 min. After CU-MN dissolution, the drug diffused from the application site and migrated through the skin layers down to 2300 µm, significantly more than observed with topical application of CU-NS. This suggest that the fabricated microneedles with the incorporated CU-NS could enhance the intradermal delivery of curcumin.


2021 ◽  
Vol 593 ◽  
pp. 120152
Author(s):  
Álvaro Cárcamo-Martínez ◽  
Brónach Mallon ◽  
Qonita Kurnia Anjani ◽  
Juan Domínguez-Robles ◽  
Emilia Utomo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. G. Jackson ◽  
M. Rowe

Diffraction intensities from intermetallic compounds are, in the kinematic approximation, proportional to the scattering amplitude from the element doing the scattering. More detailed calculations have shown that site symmetry and occupation by various atom species also affects the intensity in a diffracted beam. [1] Hence, by measuring the intensities of beams, or their ratios, the occupancy can be estimated. Measurement of the intensity values also allows structure calculations to be made to determine the spatial distribution of the potentials doing the scattering. Thermal effects are also present as a background contribution. Inelastic effects such as loss or absorption/excitation complicate the intensity behavior, and dynamical theory is required to estimate the intensity value.The dynamic range of currents in diffracted beams can be 104or 105:1. Hence, detection of such information requires a means for collecting the intensity over a signal-to-noise range beyond that obtainable with a single film plate, which has a S/N of about 103:1. Although such a collection system is not available currently, a simple system consisting of instrumentation on an existing STEM can be used as a proof of concept which has a S/N of about 255:1, limited by the 8 bit pixel attributes used in the electronics. Use of 24 bit pixel attributes would easily allowthe desired noise range to be attained in the processing instrumentation. The S/N of the scintillator used by the photoelectron sensor is about 106 to 1, well beyond the S/N goal. The trade-off that must be made is the time for acquiring the signal, since the pattern can be obtained in seconds using film plates, compared to 10 to 20 minutes for a pattern to be acquired using the digital scan. Parallel acquisition would, of course, speed up this process immensely.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri Yvonne Nottestad Boyd ◽  
Linda L. Huffer ◽  
Terry D. Bauch ◽  
James L. Furgerson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document