Cardio-pulmonary interaction during lung volume recruitment maneuvers in preterm newborns receiving high frequency oscillatory ventilation: a mathematical model

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e18-e19
Author(s):  
Giulia Portelli ◽  
Emanuela Zannin ◽  
Federico Aletti ◽  
Manuela Ferrario ◽  
Raffaele Dellacà ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Pellicano ◽  
David G. Tingay ◽  
John F. Mills ◽  
Stephen Fasulakis ◽  
Colin J. Morley ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1313-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Luecke ◽  
Juergen P. Meinhardt ◽  
Peter Herrmann ◽  
Gerald Weisser ◽  
Paolo Pelosi ◽  
...  

Background Numerous studies suggest setting positive end-expiratory pressure during conventional ventilation according to the static pressure-volume (P-V) curve, whereas data on how to adjust mean airway pressure (P(aw)) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) are still scarce. The aims of the current study were to (1) examine the respiratory and hemodynamic effects of setting P(aw) during HFOV according to the static P-V curve, (2) assess the effect of increasing and decreasing P(aw) on slice volumes and aeration patterns at the lung apex and base using computed tomography, and (3) study the suitability of the P-V curve to set P(aw) by comparing computed tomography findings during HFOV with those obtained during recording of the static P-V curve at comparable pressures. Methods Saline lung lavage was performed in seven adult pigs. P-V curves were obtained with computed tomography scanning at each volume step at the lung apex and base. The lower inflection point (Pflex) was determined, and HFOV was started with P(aw) set at Pflex. The pigs were provided five 1-h cycles of HFOV. P(aw), first set at Pflex, was increased to 1.5 times Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflex(inc)) and 2 Pflex and decreased thereafter to 1.5 times Pflex and Pflex (termed 1.5 Pflex(dec) and Pflex(dec)). Hourly measurements of respiratory and hemodynamic variables as well as computed tomography scans at the apex and base were made. Results High-frequency oscillatory ventilation at a P(aw) of 1.5 Pflex(inc) reestablished preinjury arterial oxygen tension values. Further increase in P(aw) did not change oxygenation, but it decreased oxygen delivery as a result of decreased cardiac output. No differences in respiratory or hemodynamic variables were observed when comparing HFOV at corresponding P(aw) during increasing and decreasing P(aw). Variation in total slice lung volume (TLVs) was far less than expected from the static P-V curve. Overdistended lung volume was constant and less than 3% of TLVs. TLVs values during HFOV at Pflex, 1.5 Pflex(inc), and 2 Pflex were significantly greater than TLVs values at corresponding tracheal pressures on the inflation limb of the static P-V curve and located near the deflation limb. In contrast, TLVs values during HFOV at decreasing P(aw) (i.e., 1.5 Pflex(dec) and Pflex(dec)) were not significantly greater than corresponding TLV on the deflation limb of the static P-V curves. The marked hysteresis observed during static P-V curve recordings was absent during HFOV. Conclusions High-frequency oscillatory ventilation using P(aw) set according to a static P-V curve results in effective lung recruitment, and slice lung volumes during HFOV are equal to those from the deflation limb of the static P-V curve at equivalent pressures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline de Jager ◽  
Johannes G. M. Burgerhof ◽  
Alette A. Koopman ◽  
Dick G. Markhorst ◽  
Martin C. J. Kneyber

Abstract Background Titration of the continuous distending pressure during a staircase incremental–decremental pressure lung volume optimization maneuver in children on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation is traditionally driven by oxygenation and hemodynamic responses, although validity of these metrics has not been confirmed. Methods Respiratory inductance plethysmography values were used construct pressure–volume loops during the lung volume optimization maneuver. The maneuver outcome was evaluated by three independent investigators and labeled positive if there was an increase in respiratory inductance plethysmography values at the end of the incremental phase. Metrics for oxygenation (SpO2, FiO2), proximal pressure amplitude, tidal volume and transcutaneous measured pCO2 (ptcCO2) obtained during the incremental phase were compared between outcome maneuvers labeled positive and negative to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Ventilation efficacy was assessed during and after the maneuver by measuring arterial pH and PaCO2. Hemodynamic responses during and after the maneuver were quantified by analyzing heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial lactate. Results 41/54 patients (75.9%) had a positive maneuver albeit that changes in respiratory inductance plethysmography values were very heterogeneous. During the incremental phase of the maneuver, metrics for oxygenation and tidal volume showed good sensitivity (> 80%) but poor sensitivity. The sensitivity of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio increased to 92.7% one hour after the maneuver. The proximal pressure amplitude showed poor sensitivity during the maneuver, whereas tidal volume showed good sensitivity but poor specificity. PaCO2 decreased and pH increased in patients with a positive and negative maneuver outcome. No new barotrauma or hemodynamic instability (increase in age-adjusted heart rate, decrease in age-adjusted mean arterial blood pressure or lactate > 2.0 mmol/L) occurred as a result of the maneuver. Conclusions Absence of improvements in oxygenation during a lung volume optimization maneuver did not indicate that there were no increases in lung volume quantified using respiratory inductance plethysmography. Increases in SpO2/FiO2 one hour after the maneuver may suggest ongoing lung volume recruitment. Ventilation was not impaired and there was no new barotrauma or hemodynamic instability. The heterogeneous responses in lung volume changes underscore the need for monitoring tools during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard K. Wolf ◽  
Bartłomiej Grychtol ◽  
Inez Frerichs ◽  
David Zurakowski ◽  
John H. Arnold

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document