Routine chest X-ray is unnecessary after ultrasound-guided central venous line placement in the operating room

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Woodland ◽  
C. Randall Cooper ◽  
M. Farzan Rashid ◽  
Vilma L. Rosario ◽  
Paul David Weyker ◽  
...  
CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chui ◽  
Rasha Saeed ◽  
Luke Jakobowski ◽  
Wanyu Wang ◽  
Basem Eldeyasty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e001222
Author(s):  
Enyo A Ablordeppey ◽  
Byron Powell ◽  
Virginia McKay ◽  
Shannon Keating ◽  
Aimee James ◽  
...  

IntroductionAvoiding low value medical practices is an important focus in current healthcare utilisation. Despite advantages of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) over chest X-ray including improved workflow and timeliness of results, POCUS-guided central venous catheter (CVC) position confirmation has slow rate of adoption. This demonstrates a gap that is ripe for the development of an intervention.MethodsThe intervention is a deimplementation programme called DRAUP (deimplementation of routine chest radiographs after adoption of ultrasound-guided insertion and confirmation of central venous catheter protocol) that will be created to address one unnecessary imaging modality in the acute care environment. We propose a three-phase approach to changing low-value practices. In phase 1, we will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to explore barriers and facilitators of POCUS for CVC confirmation in a single centre, large tertiary, academic hospital via focus groups. The qualitative methods will inform the development and adaptation of strategies that address identified determinants of change. In phase 2, the multifaceted strategies will be conceptualised using Morgan’s framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse. In phase 3, we will locally implement these strategies and assess them using Proctor’s outcomes (adoption, deadoption, fidelity and penetration) in an observational study to demonstrate proof of concept, gaining valuable insights on the programme. Secondary outcomes will include POCUS-guided CVC confirmation efficacy measured by time and effectiveness measured by sensitivity and specificity of POCUS confirmation after CVC insertion.With limited data available to inform interventions that use concurrent implementation and deimplementation strategies to substitute chest X-ray for POCUS using the DRAUP programme, we propose that this primary implementation and secondary effectiveness pilot study will provide novel data that will expand the knowledge of implementation approaches to replacing low value or unnecessary care in acute care environments.Ethics and disseminationApproval of the study by the Human Research Protection Office has been obtained. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT04324762, registered on 27 March 2020.


ISRN Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wayne Overby ◽  
Geoffrey P. Kohn ◽  
Karen J. Colton ◽  
Joseph M. Stavas ◽  
Robert G. Dixon ◽  
...  

Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required minutes to skin incision compared with minutes for controls (), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Leah Naidoo ◽  
Damon Jeetoo ◽  
George Oosthuizen ◽  
Grant Laing ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document