Influence of preoperative pain intensity on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: A prospective clinical study

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akram Alí ◽  
Juan Gonzalo Olivieri ◽  
Fernando Duran-Sindreu ◽  
Francesc Abella ◽  
Miguel Roig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Preoperative Pain

scholarly journals Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 784-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Arias ◽  
J. C. de la Macorra ◽  
J. J. Hidalgo ◽  
M. Azabal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study

scholarly journals Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers Do Not Reduce the Risk and Intensity of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Treatment when Compared with Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emílio Carlos Sponchiado Junior ◽  
Walbert de Andrade Vieira ◽  
Ana Gabriela Costa Normando ◽  
Juliana Vianna Pereira ◽  
Caio Cezar Randi Ferraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractThis review aims to evaluate whether root canal obturation with calcium silicate-based (CSB) sealers reduces the risk and intensity of endodontic postoperative pain when compared to epoxy resin-based (ERB) sealers. The review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020169255). Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic search in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and LILACS until November 2020 and included only randomized clinical trials with adult health participants undergoing root canal treatment. After selection, the JBI Critical Appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A fixed-effect meta-analysis was performed to summarize the results of pain risk and pain intensity at time intervals of 24 and 48 hours. Finally, the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The search resulted in 1,206 records, of which five studies (n = 421 patients) met the eligibility criteria and presented moderate to low risk of bias. There was no significant difference between groups in the risk of pain in the first 24 hours (relative risk or RR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval or CI: 0.60, 1.16, I 2 =) or 48 hours (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.26, 1.21, I 2 =). Silicate-based sealers led to lower pain intensity only at 48 hours (mean and standard deviation = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.05). All analyses revealed low heterogeneity (I 2 < 25%). The evidence presented moderate level of certainty. Currently available evidence has shown that there is no difference between CSB and ERB sealers in the risk or intensity of postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Periodontal Pain According to the Type of Precision Orthodontic Appliances: Vestibular, Lingual and Aligners. A Prospective Clinical Study

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 379
Author(s):  
Laura Antonio-Zancajo ◽  
Javier Montero ◽  
Daniele Garcovich ◽  
Mario Alvarado-Lorenzo ◽  
Alberto Albaladejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Low Friction ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Lower Arch

The objective of this prospective clinical study was to analyze the pain (intensity, location and type) that patients presented after the placement of different types of orthodontic appliances: conventional, low friction, lingual and aligners. The sample consisted of 120 patients divided into four groups: conventional (CON), low friction (LF), lingual (LO) and aligners (INV). The participants were given the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (Ortho-SF-MPQ), where they had to record the pain intensity (no pain, mild, moderate or intense) and the periodontal location at different time points, from the first 4 h to 7 days after the start of treatment. In all the study groups, the most frequent location was both anterior arches, with maximum values between 56.7% (CON group at 24 h) and 30% (LO group at 4 h). The “whole mouth” and “complete lower arch” locations were indicated only by the patients in the lingual group. Regarding pain intensity, the patients reported a higher percentage of mild–moderate pain during the first 3 days of treatment (96.7% in LO at 4 h, 86.7% in CON, 83.3% in LF and 90% in INV at 24 h); later, the reported pain decreased to no pain/mild pain, especially in the lingual group, until reaching values close to zero at 7 days post-treatment. The most frequent type of pain was acute in the low friction and lingual groups (with maxima of 60% and 46.7% at 24 h, respectively). On the contrary, in the conventional (36.7% at 4 h) and Invisalign (40% at 24 h) groups, the sensitive type was the most frequent. There are differences regarding periodontal pain in its intensity, location and type according to the use of different orthodontic techniques.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of a Bioceramic and Conventional Resin-Based Sealers on Postoperative Pain after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2661
Author(s):  
Kiche Shim ◽  
Young-Eun Jang ◽  
Yemi Kim
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2

Background: This clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of bioceramic sealer and resin-based sealer on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. Methods: Patients with anterior teeth or premolars requiring root canal treatment were assigned to group 1 (n = 51). Those with molars requiring treatment were assigned to group 2 (n = 57). In groups 1En and 2En, root canals were obturated with Endoseal MTA using the single-cone technique. In groups 1AH and 2AH, the sealer used was AH Plus with the continuous wave technique. On the day of canal filling, each patient was instructed to indicate their pain intensity over the 7 day postoperative period, at rest and, while biting, using a visual analog scale. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence or intensity of postoperative pain between the Endoseal MTA and AH Plus groups during the 7 day postoperative period (p > 0.05). Less time was needed to seal the root canals with Endoseal MTA, especially in group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoseal MTA and AH Plus had similar effects on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. The obturation time was shorter when using Endoseal MTA compared to AH Plus.

Fracture Incidence of WaveOne and Reciproc Files during Root Canal Preparation of up to 3 Posterior Teeth: A Prospective Clinical Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 705-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clóvis Stephano Pereira Bueno ◽  
Daniel Pinto de Oliveira ◽  
Rina Andrea Pelegrine ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Fontana ◽  
Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Fracture Incidence ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Posterior Teeth
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document