scholarly journals Prosocial managers, employee motivation, and the creation of shareholder value

2020 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 217-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agne Kajackaite ◽  
Dirk Sliwka
Author(s):  
S.F. Lehenchuk ◽  
I.R. Polishchuk

The normative-legal regulation of accounting of formation and use of reserve capital is established. Legislative regulation of the minimum size of reserve capital for different types of companies has been clarified. For joint-stock companies, in contrast to other types of companies, the legislation provides for the possibility of reducing the minimum deductions (including up to 0 %) when the reserve capital reaches the minimum size. A statistical analysis of the structure of equity by type of economic activity is made. It is established that out of 15 types of economic activity, only three (agriculture, forestry and fisheries; education; provision of other services) have profitable activity. Profitable types of economic activity are characterized by the dominance of retained earnings or additional capital in the structure of equity, with reserve capital occupying a small share. The common features and differences of additional and reserve capital are established. Common one is the creation of various funds, the source of which is net income. A distinctive feature is the ability to use funds. Additional capital provides for the creation of a fund for the renewal of non-current assets, employee motivation, etc. and the use of funds for these needs. Unlike additional capital, reserve capital is formed to eliminate crisis moments in the enterprise, reaches a certain size and may not be used for years, because it has a clear purpose – to cover losses, pay dividends on preferred shares and guarantees to creditors in liquidation. The method of accounting of reserve capital, which allows distinguishing the minimum level defined by the legislation and the sum exceeding the minimum size is offered.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl G. Waldron

<p class="MsoBodyTextIndent" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt; color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">A sample of the best manufacturing firms from Industrial Week&rsquo;s Annual Survey of Manufacturers (2008-2009) is analyzed within the context of a value driver matrix and free cash flow regime that link manufacturing to important determinants of shareholder value.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The framework for analysis developed in association with this analysis relies on the format advocated by Rappaport (1998), whereby a manufacturing value driver map is derived that isolates those variables generally accepted as determinant with respect to manufacturing performance.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>This map is subsequently used to identify that subset of variables that have the greatest impact on value and, in turn, to focus on those micro-value drivers over which operations management has a meaningful level of control.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span></em><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">If superior performance measured in terms of the micro-value drivers is an avenue to manufacturing excellence and the creation of shareholder value, one would expect to see statistically significant relationships between these predictor variables (micro-value drivers) and market value.<span style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Here this proposition is tested by way of</span> a simultaneous reverse entry multiple regression analysis where market capitalization (<span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">V<sub>0</sub></span>) is treated as a function of a set of manufacturing related micro-value drivers.</span></em></span></p>


Contexts ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald F. Davis

“Shareholder value” was the sacred mantra of American business in the 1990s. But creating shareholder value can be a fickle undertaking and corporate executives often followed the lead of their colleagues. The result was a contagion of questionable business practices that resulted in the creation of a corporate bubble—and its implosion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Praptiestrini .

This research aims to analyses (1) effect of motivation on organizational commitment (2) effect of job satisfaction on organizational commitment (3) effect of work environment on organizational commitment. This research using samples of 84 employee of Alfamart in Karanganyar District area. To test the hypothesis using regression analysis. The result shows that (1) motivation have significance effect on organizational commitment (2) job satisfaction have significance effect on organizational commitment (3) work environment have significance effect on organizational commitment. This finding has a strategic implication for leaders, to develop organizational commitment of company employees need to increase employee motivation and job satisfaction and also support the creation of aconducive environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document