Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India

2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagothu Udaya Sekhar
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bitapi C. Sinha ◽  
Qamar Qureshi ◽  
V. K. Uniyal ◽  
S. Sen

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archi Rastogi ◽  
Gordon M. Hickey ◽  
Anupam Anand ◽  
Ruchi Badola ◽  
Syed Ainul Hussain

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahender Reddy Gavinolla ◽  
Vikrant Kaushal ◽  
Agita Livina ◽  
Sampada Kumar Swain ◽  
Hemant Kumar

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to review the existing landscape of consumption and production in wildlife tourism and, more precisely, discuss how tiger tourism is packaged and produced as a product or commodity for the consumption of wildlife tourists. In doing so, the study explores the issues and challenges for responsible consumption and production (SCP) of wildlife tourism in the context of progress toward sustainable development goal (SDG12) responsible consumption and production. Design/methodology/approach The paper combines an analysis of existing literature and insights from the tiger reserve stakeholders. Qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews and participant observation methods are used to derive insights. Findings This paper explores the status of SCP of wildlife tourism, particularly tiger tourism in Indian national parks. The paper then discusses the implications of SCP for various stakeholders in wildlife tourism. Originality/value This paper explores the perspective of SCP in wildlife tourism, and it provides innovative approaches that stakeholders should adopt.


Author(s):  
KANGA SHRUTI ◽  
SHAHEEN AYESHA ◽  
KUMAR SINGH SURAJ ◽  
PANDEY A.C. ◽  
◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2100-2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dunston P. Ambrose ◽  
D. Senthil Raj

Author(s):  
Catherine E. De Vries

This chapter introduces a benchmark theory of public opinion towards European integration. Rather than relying on generic labels like support or scepticism, the chapter suggests that public opinion towards the EU is both multidimensional and multilevel in nature. People’s attitudes towards Europe are essentially based on a comparison between the benefits of the status quo of membership and those associated with an alternative state, namely one’s country being outside the EU. This comparison is coined the ‘EU differential’. When comparing these benefits, people rely on both their evaluations of the outcomes (policy evaluations) and the system that produces them (regime evaluations). This chapter presents a fine-grained conceptualization of what it means to be an EU supporter or Eurosceptic; it also designs a careful empirical measurement strategy to capture variation, both cross-nationally and over time. The chapter cross-validates these measures against a variety of existing and newly developed data sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document