Contextualizing small family firms: How does the urban–rural context affect firm employment growth?

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikaela Backman ◽  
Johanna Palmberg
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 12520
Author(s):  
Maksim Belitski ◽  
Christina Guenther ◽  
Nada Khachlouf
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9/10) ◽  
pp. 809-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Chepurenko

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to deal with informal entrepreneurial activity of micro and small family businesses in the specific transitional environment. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses two cases – an informal micro business (“marginal” family business), and a formal retail small firm (“simpleton” family firm), respectively, of a panel conducted in 2013–2015 in Moscow. Findings First, the real distribution of responsibilities between family members is informal; it relies more on interpersonal trust and “common law.” Second, exactly the ease of governing such trust-based businesses for the founders’ generation sets limits of succession of small-scale family businesses. Third, as trust in the state is very low, the policy of Russian authorities to quickly force informal entrepreneurs to become legalized is substantially wrong; the results would be either a transformation of “simpleton” into “marginal” businesses or quitting business. Research limitations/implications Research limitations of the study are the number of observations and the localization of the panel only in the capital of Russia. Practical implications The fundamental failure of Russian State policy toward small-scale family businesses is its attempt to convince “marginal” to formalize and to oppress “simpleton” family businesses pushing them into informality. In fact, it should be designed vice versa: tolerate “marginal” businesses and let them to “live and die” while shaping a friendly environment for “simpleton” family firms. Originality/value The paper argues that the most important facet of informality in small family entrepreneurship is the informal property rights and governance duties’ distribution among the family members.


1992 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 361
Author(s):  
John Herbert Roper ◽  
John William Graves

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panikkos Poutziouris ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Sally Chan
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1626
Author(s):  
Loren Schweninger ◽  
John William Graves

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Dhamija Gupta ◽  
Sonali Bhattacharya

In this research paper, we have studied the role and process of knowledge management in small family businesses at different stages of its growth: startup, business consolidation and succession. We intend to study if in family run MSME clusters education of firm owner gives any edge in the sustainability of the business. There is lack of availability of literature on study of Indian MSME with family business perspective. Our study encompasses factors that stimulate innovation, technology acquisition and business growth and sustainability. Evidences have been drawn from brass manufacturing cluster of Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The research is based on cross-case analysis of six brassware manufacturing units of Moradabad. We attempted to build on existing literature reviews on knowledge management process in family firms and assess how these theories fit in case of small family run export oriented enterprises, which are highly competitive. It was found family relationship, attitude to learn, critical thinking and social capital are keys in determining sustainability of these firms. A theoretical model has been curved out of the study.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 209-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
LINDA S. NIEHM ◽  
NANCY J. MILLER ◽  
MACK C. SHELLEY ◽  
MARGARET A. FITZGERALD

This study identified 14 adjustment strategies employed by household and business managers to cope with overlapping work and family demands using data from 1997 and 2000 versions of the National Family Business Survey (NFBS). Significant differences were found between surviving small family firms by managerial role (single or dual) regarding gross income, gender, number of children under age 18, community size and trade sector. Both surviving and non-surviving enterprises tended to bring household work to the business field when times were hectic and demanding, and took care of family responsibilities while at the business. However, in non-surviving businesses, business managers reported a greater tendency to bring work home, demonstrating that work entered the family field more frequently than in surviving businesses. Managers of surviving businesses were more likely to make financial adjustments by hiring temporary help for the business or home, and less likely to ask others to help in the business without pay. Significant differences were also noted regarding the use of non-financial adjustments; managers of surviving family businesses were able to shift away from business work to spend time on family aspects, and to spend less time sleeping to help the business.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document