Biological sulfate reduction in an epigene karst aquifer and its impact on cave environment

2021 ◽  
pp. 126804
Author(s):  
Fang Guo ◽  
Guanghui Jiang ◽  
Fan Liu
2020 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 106408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marja Salo ◽  
Oleg Knauf ◽  
Jarno Mäkinen ◽  
Xiaosheng Yang ◽  
Pertti Koukkari

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madawala Liyanage Duminda Jayaranjan ◽  
Ajit P. Annachhatre

Investigations were undertaken to utilize flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum for the treatment of leachate from the coal ash (CA) dump sites. Bench-scale investigations consisted of three main steps namely hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) using sulfate from solubilized FGD gypsum as the electron acceptor, followed by leaching of heavy metals (HMs) from coal bottom ash (CBA) and subsequent precipitation of HMs using biologically produced sulfide. Leaching tests of CBA carried out at acidic pH revealed the existence of several HMs such as Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Mn, Cu, Ni and Zn. Molasses was used as the electron donor for the biological sulfate reduction (BSR) process which produced sulfide rich effluent with concentration up to 150 mg/L. Sulfide rich effluent from the sulfate reduction process was used to precipitate HMs as metal sulfides from CBA leachate. HM removal in the range from 40 to 100% was obtained through sulfide precipitation.


Chemosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 124246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahrokh Shahsavari ◽  
Rajesh Seth ◽  
Subba Rao Chaganti ◽  
Nihar Biswas

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warounsak Liamleam ◽  
Ajit P. Annachhatre

2013 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 799-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huawei Wang ◽  
Fulong Chen ◽  
Shuyong Mu ◽  
Daoyong Zhang ◽  
Xiangliang Pan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document