In vivo study assessed meropenem and amikacin combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
Hideo Kato ◽  
Rieko Yamashita ◽  
Midori Soda ◽  
Hiroki Watanabe ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S57-S57
Author(s):  
Ken-ichiro Kasura ◽  
Megumi Watanabe ◽  
Kumiko Takahashi ◽  
Genki Mizukoshi ◽  
Seiji Ohkubo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Abe ◽  
Hideharu Hagiya ◽  
Yukihiro Akeda ◽  
Norihisa Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshikazu Ishii ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are among the most severe threats to public and clinical health because of their high levels of resistance to various antibiotics. We assessed the efficacy of combination therapy with meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) against Imipenemase (IMP)-producing CRE, using the checkerboard method and time-killing assay on 13 Enterobacteriaceae isolates harboring blaIMP-1 (4 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Escherichia coli, and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates) and 13 isolates harboring blaIMP-6 (8 E. coli and 5 K. pneumoniae isolates). Results: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEM and CMZ ranged from 2 to 64 and 64 to 2048 μg/mL, respectively. Checkerboard method demonstrated the synergy of the MEM/CMZ combination in all the tested IMP-producing CRE isolates, and the time-kill assay indicated a bactericidal effect for both blaIMP-1 and blaIMP-6 positive CRE when MEM/CMZ combination was used. In vitro, the MEM/CMZ combination was potentially effective against IMP-1- or IMP-6-producing CRE. Further investigations including in vivo animal studies and clinical studies are warranted to corroborate the clinical utility of the novel combination therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruifeng Ge ◽  
Jin-Chul Ahn ◽  
Jang-In Shin ◽  
Chan Woong Bahk ◽  
Peijie He ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1964
Author(s):  
Ya-Ting Chang ◽  
Tsung-Ying Yang ◽  
Po-Liang Lu ◽  
Shang-Yi Lin ◽  
Liang-Chun Wang ◽  
...  

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is listed as an urgent threat by the World Health Organization because of the limited therapeutic options, rapid evolution of resistance mechanisms, and worldwide dissemination. Colistin is a common backbone agent among the “last-resort” antibiotics for CRE; however, its emerging resistance among CRE has taken the present dilemma to the next level. Azidothymidine (AZT), a thymidine analog used to treat human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, has been known to possess antibacterial effects against Enterobacteriaceae. In this study, we investigated the combined effects of AZT and colistin in 40 clinical isolates of colistin-resistant, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CCRKP). Eleven of the 40 isolates harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. The in vitro checkerboard method and in vivo nematode killing assay both revealed synergistic activity between the two agents, with fractional inhibitory concentration indexes of ≤0.5 in every strain. Additionally, a significantly lower hazard ratio was observed for the nematodes treated with combination therapy (0.288; p < 0.0001) compared with either AZT or colistin treatment. Toxicity testing indicated potentially low toxicity of the combination therapy. Thus, the AZT–colistin combination could be a potentially favorable therapeutic option for treating CCRKP.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Abe ◽  
Hideharu Hagiya ◽  
Yukihiro Akeda ◽  
Norihisa Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshikazu Ishii ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are among the most severe threats to public and clinical health because of their high levels of resistance to various antibiotics. We assessed the efficacy of combination therapy with meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) against IMP-producing CRE, using the checkerboard method and time-killing assay on 13 Enterobacteriaceae isolates harboring blaIMP-1 (4 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Escherichia coli, and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates) and 13 isolates harboring blaIMP-6 (8 E. coli and 5 K. pneumoniae isolates). Results: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEM and CMZ ranged from 2 to 64 and 64 to 2048 μg/mL, respectively. Checkerboard method demonstrated the synergy of the MEM/CMZ combination in all the tested IMP-producing CRE isolates, and the time-kill assay indicated a bactericidal effect for both blaIMP-1 and blaIMP-6 positive CRE when MEM/CMZ combination was used. In vitro, the MEM/CMZ combination was potentially effective against IMP-1- or IMP-6-producing CRE. Further investigations including in vivo animal studies and clinical studies are warranted to corroborate the clinical utility of the novel combination therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Abe ◽  
Hideharu Hagiya ◽  
Yukihiro Akeda ◽  
Norihisa Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshikazu Ishii ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are among the most severe threats to public and clinical health because of their high levels of resistance to various antibiotics. We assessed the efficacy of combination therapy with meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) against Imipenemase (IMP)-producing CRE, using the checkerboard method and time-killing assay on 13 Enterobacteriaceae isolates harboring blaIMP-1 (4 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Escherichia coli, and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates) and 13 isolates harboring blaIMP-6 (8 E. coli and 5 K. pneumoniae isolates). Results Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEM and CMZ ranged from 2 to 64 and 64 to 2048 μg/mL, respectively. Checkerboard method demonstrated the synergy of the MEM/CMZ combination in all the tested IMP-producing CRE isolates, and the time-kill assay indicated a bactericidal effect for both blaIMP-1 and blaIMP-6 positive CRE when MEM/CMZ combination was used. In vitro, the MEM/CMZ combination was potentially effective against IMP-1- or IMP-6-producing CRE. Further investigations including in vivo animal studies and clinical studies are warranted to corroborate the clinical utility of the novel combination therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 218 ◽  
pp. 111381
Author(s):  
Dongmei Zhao ◽  
Hongru Li ◽  
Chengcheng Yue ◽  
Kaili Sun ◽  
Yuanyuan Dai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document