scholarly journals Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abubakar Mohammed Abubakar ◽  
Hamzah Elrehail ◽  
Maher Ahmad Alatailat ◽  
Alev Elçi
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abdelrahman ◽  
Firas Masri ◽  
Dimitra Skoumpopoulou

With the advent of the knowledge economy and the growing importance of knowledge societies, organizations are constantly seeking new ways of leveraging and sharing knowledge to support decision-making (DM) processes. This chapter presents an initial insight to the little-researched phenomenon of how knowledge management systems (KMSs) can facilitate knowledge sharing (KS) to support DM processes in organizations. In this chapter, authors aim to extend the existing literature of knowledge management, decision making, and knowledge sharing by proposing a new conceptual framework, namely “ECUA” (easiness, communication, unification, and analytics characteristics). In this study, 42 semi-structured interviews have been conducted. The proposed conceptual framework will benefit managers in both public and private sectors in finding new ways of leveraging and sharing knowledge to support DM processes via using KMSs. This framework can be used to explore KMSs characteristics that can support DM processes by facilitating knowledge sharing in organizations.


Author(s):  
Nikos Karacapilidis

This chapter discusses issues to be considered in the development of a framework with advanced e-collaboration features for learning purposes. Having first identified the underlying requirements, we review enabling technologies and propose an approach that seamlessly integrates knowledge management, decision-making, argumentative discourse, and simulation issues. In addition, we comment on the extent to which our approach satisfies the needs of virtual learning communities and supports various learning methods such as learning by doing, conversational learning, and constructive criticism of an issue or an abstract idea. The proposed framework acts as a medium on which diverse knowledge and information sources can be attached, thus aiding people involved in a learning process to widen their perspectives and learn from past experience.


Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abdelrahman ◽  
Firas Masri ◽  
Dimitra Skoumpopoulou

With the advent of the knowledge economy and the growing importance of knowledge societies, organizations are constantly seeking new ways of leveraging and sharing knowledge to support decision-making (DM) processes. This chapter presents an initial insight to the little-researched phenomenon of how knowledge management systems (KMSs) can facilitate knowledge sharing (KS) to support DM processes in organizations. In this chapter, authors aim to extend the existing literature of knowledge management, decision making, and knowledge sharing by proposing a new conceptual framework, namely “ECUA” (easiness, communication, unification, and analytics characteristics). In this study, 42 semi-structured interviews have been conducted. The proposed conceptual framework will benefit managers in both public and private sectors in finding new ways of leveraging and sharing knowledge to support DM processes via using KMSs. This framework can be used to explore KMSs characteristics that can support DM processes by facilitating knowledge sharing in organizations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-83
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Regert ◽  
Gilberto Medeiros Borges Junior ◽  
Sandra Mara Bragagnolo ◽  
Joel Haroldo Baade

Nos tempos hodiernos, a crise é uma constante que deve ser levada em consideração para a tomada de decisão. As empresas brasileiras, por estarem inseridas num cenário cuja economia é instável, precisam buscar diariamente informações na contabilidade sobre sua situação financeira, visando extrair dados que auxiliem na tomada de decisão. Tendo em vista isso, o presente artigo tem como objetivo realizar uma abordagem sobre a importância dos principais indicadores econômicos, financeiros e de endividamento como gestão do conhecimento na tomada de decisão. Diante deste contexto, serão abordados conceitos, objetivos, tipos e vantagens da análise econômica, financeira e de endividamento que podem ser realizadas em uma empresa. Para isso, a pesquisa será de forma descritiva com base bibliográfica. Conclui-se que esse estudo dará condições de conhecer a situação econômico-financeira de uma organização, analisando-a através de três pontos fundamentais: Liquidez, Rentabilidade e Endividamento. Ter ciência disso é essencial para a tomada de decisão, uma vez que a empresa precisa ter conhecimento da sua situação patrimonial para efetuar investimentos e projeções futuras.Palavras-Chave: Indicadores econômico-financeiros. Gestão do conhecimento. Tomada de decisão. The importance of economic, financial and debt indicators as knowledge management in decision-making in crisis timesAbstract: In modern times, the crisis is a constant that must be taken into account for decision making. Brazilian companies, because they are inserted in a scenario in which economy is unstable, need to daily seek information in the accounting about their financial situation, in order to extract data that aid in decision making. Thus, the present article aims to make an approach on the importance of the main economic, financial and debt indicators as knowledge management in decision making. Given this context, concepts, objectives, types and advantages of economic, financial and indebtedness analysis that can be carried out in a company will be addressed. For this, the research will be descriptive on a bibliographic basis. It is concluded that this study will provide conditions to know the economic-financial situation of an organization, analyzing it through three fundamental points: Liquidity, Profitability and Indebtedness. Knowing this is essential for decision making, since the company needs to be aware of its financial position to make future investments and projections.Keywords: Economic indicators. Economic and financial indicators. Knowledge management. Decision-making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tekieli ◽  
Marion Festing ◽  
Xavier Baeten

Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh A. Baumgart ◽  
Ellen J. Bass ◽  
Brenda Philips ◽  
Kevin Kloesel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document