Power requirements for the hovering flight of insects with different sizes

2021 ◽  
pp. 104293
Author(s):  
Yu Zhu Lyu ◽  
Mao Sun
Keyword(s):  
AIAA Journal ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. P. JONES ◽  
B. M. RAO

2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (16) ◽  
pp. 2413-2427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Sun ◽  
Jian Tang

SUMMARYThe lift and power requirements for hovering flight in Drosophila virilis were studied using the method of computational fluid dynamics. The Navier-Stokes equations were solved numerically. The solution provided the flow velocity and pressure fields, from which the unsteady aerodynamic forces and moments were obtained. The inertial torques due to the acceleration of the wing mass were computed analytically. On the basis of the aerodynamic forces and moments and the inertial torques, the lift and power requirements for hovering flight were obtained.For the fruit fly Drosophila virilis in hovering flight (with symmetrical rotation), a midstroke angle of attack of approximately 37°was needed for the mean lift to balance the insect weight, which agreed with observations. The mean drag on the wings over an up- or downstroke was approximately 1.27 times the mean lift or insect weight (i.e. the wings of this tiny insect must overcome a drag that is approximately 27 % larger than its weight to produce a lift equal to its weight). The body-mass-specific power was 28.7 W kg-1, the muscle-mass-specific power was 95.7 W kg-1 and the muscle efficiency was 17 %.With advanced rotation, larger lift was produced than with symmetrical rotation, but it was more energy-demanding, i.e. the power required per unit lift was much larger. With delayed rotation, much less lift was produced than with symmetrical rotation at almost the same power expenditure; again, the power required per unit lift was much larger. On the basis of the calculated results for power expenditure, symmetrical rotation should be used for balanced, long-duration flight and advanced rotation and delayed rotation should be used for flight control and manoeuvring. This agrees with observations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Chin Wah Chen ◽  
Kenneth Collins Welch

2014 ◽  
pp. 409-414
Author(s):  
Q Wang ◽  
J Goosen ◽  
F van Keulen

Author(s):  
Shih-Sin Wei ◽  
Meng-Che Lee ◽  
Jhen-Wei Huang ◽  
Yueh Lu ◽  
Che-Hao Kang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Naeem Haider ◽  
Aamer Shahzad ◽  
Muhammad Nafees Mumtaz Qadri ◽  
Taimur Ali Shams

1979 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
STUART B. SAVAGE ◽  
BARRY G. NEWMAN ◽  
DENIS T.-M. WONG

Weis-Fogh and Norberg concluded that steady-state aerodynamics is incapable of explaining how the dragonfly supports its weight during hovering. Norberg also concluded that the wing kinematics of Aeschna juncea L., as determined photographically, are incompatible with those proposed by Weis-Fogh for his Flip mechanism. The present paper has proposed an alternative lift-generating mechanism, various aspects of which are novel from the standpoint of animal flight. Flow visualization tests performed in water established the flow field during a complete cycle of the idealized wing motion. Using this information and unsteady inviscid flow theory the forces were analysed. A plausible balance of horizontal forces and more than sufficient lift were obtained. A physical explanation of the theory is provided for those who do not wish to study the mathematical details.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document