scholarly journals In-hospital resource utilization, worsening heart failure, and factors associated with length of hospital stay in patients with hospitalized heart failure: A Japanese database cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Mitani ◽  
Minako Funakubo ◽  
Naoki Sato ◽  
Hiroki Murayama ◽  
Roberto Abi Rached ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Koichi Washida ◽  
Takao Kato ◽  
Neiko Ozasa ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
Hidenori Yaku ◽  
...  

Background No clinical studies have focused on the factors associated with discharge destination in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods and Results Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure in the KCHF (Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure) registry, we analyzed 3460 patients hospitalized from their homes and discharged alive. There were 3009 and 451 patients who were discharged to home and nonhome, respectively. We investigated the factors associated with nonhome discharge and compared the outcomes between home discharge and nonhome discharge. Factors independently and positively associated with nonhome discharge were age ≥80 years (odds ratio [OR],1.76; 95% CI,1.28–2.42), body mass index ≤22 kg/m 2 (OR,1.49; 95% CI,1.12–1.97), poor medication adherence (OR, 2.08; 95% CI,1.49–2.88), worsening heart failure (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.46–2.82), stroke during hospitalization (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.75–8.00), functional decline (OR, 12.24; 95% CI, 8.74–17.14), and length of hospital stay >16 days (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 3.01–5.69), while those negatively associated were diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51–0.94), cohabitants (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46–0.85), and ambulatory state before admission (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18–0.36). The cumulative 1‐year incidence of all‐cause death was significantly higher in the nonhome discharge group than in the home discharge group. The nonhome discharge group compared with the nonhome discharge group was associated with a higher adjusted risk for all‐cause death (hazard ratio, 1.66; P <0.001). Conclusions The discharge destination of patients with acute decompensated heart failure is influenced by factors such as prehospital social background, age, body mass index, low self‐care ability, events during hospitalization (worsening heart failure, stroke, etc), functional decline, and length of hospital stay; moreover, the prognosis of nonhome discharge patients is worse than that of home discharge patients. Registration Information clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02334891.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
Aristidis Tziovas ◽  
Theocharis Livieratos ◽  
George Fagogenis ◽  
Alexandros Patsilinakos ◽  
Fotini Kontari ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohannes Gebreegziabher ◽  
Peter A McCullough ◽  
Chard Bubb ◽  
Lesel Loney-Hutchinson ◽  
John N. Makaryus ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Fidel Sierra Zúñiga ◽  
Oscar Eduardo Castro Delgado ◽  
Angela María Merchán-Galvis ◽  
Juan Carlos Caicedo Caicedo ◽  
Jose Andrés Calvache ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. S109
Author(s):  
Santh V.S. Silparshetty ◽  
Hyma V. Polimera ◽  
Mahesh Aradhya ◽  
Deepakraj Gajanana ◽  
Ellen Amedeo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document