scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tubal Surgery Versus in Vitro Fertilization As Treatment for Tubal Infertility

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. S143-S144
Author(s):  
A.S. Womack ◽  
A. Tsang ◽  
C. Buskmiller ◽  
N.D. Mahnert ◽  
J. Keenan ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1719-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim Daya ◽  
Joanne Gunby ◽  
Edward G. Hughes ◽  
John A. Collins ◽  
Margaret A. Sagle ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ger Haan

AbstractThe decision whether to enhance diffusion and to reimburse for the fertility treatment in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was postponed in the Netherlands until the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis were known. IVF appeared to be as cost-effective as its most important alternative, tubal surgery. But policy decisions still were not straightforward, obscuring important social and ethical issues.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 924-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Griffiths ◽  
S. M. Dyer ◽  
S. J. Lord ◽  
C. Pardy ◽  
I. S. Fraser ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document