Preparation and characterization of magnetic polymer nanospheres with high protein binding capacity

2005 ◽  
Vol 293 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianqiao Liu ◽  
Yueping Guan ◽  
Huizhou Liu ◽  
Zhiya Ma ◽  
Yu Yang ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bourget ◽  
Valérie Quinquis-Desmaris ◽  
Hervé Fernandez

OBJECTIVE: To study postpartum distribution and protein binding of ceftriaxone (CTX) between maternal blood and milk and to discuss risk factors and possible impact for the neonate. DATA SOURCES: Reference articles and books are identified in the text. DATA SYNTHESIS: CTX distribution and protein binding between maternal blood and milk postpartum were studied in a patient at term presenting with acute pyelonephritis caused by Escherichia coli. The antibiotic therapy prescribed pending bacteriology results consisted of CTX 2 g/d, ornidazole 1 g/d, and tobramycin 3 mg/kg/d. Pharmacokinetics of total CTX were studied after the first 2-g infusion. At plateau (i.e., two days after delivery; seventh infusion), pharmacokinetics and milk distribution of total and free CTX also were studied. No accumulation of CTX was noted in the plasma at plateau. When high dosages of CTX are used (∼2g), its penetration into the milk is important (i.e., protein binding capacity is overwhelmed). No notable adverse reactions occurred in mother or child. Thus, an important diffusion into the milk (4.4 percent of the dose) appears not to be clinically important. Our knowledge of both metabolism and milk distribution of drugs with high protein binding (≥95 percent) and an acid characteristic should be expanded to better understand their use during both the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Finally, the child of the patient described here has normal initial growth and development at the present time. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be taken when drugs such as CTX, which have both high protein binding (≥95 percent) and an acid characteristic are administered to breastfeeding women. Drugs of this type should be systematically investigated to better understand their use during pregnancy and postpartum.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3163
Author(s):  
Nina Bjørk Arnfinnsdottir ◽  
Cole A. Chapman ◽  
Ryan C. Bailey ◽  
Astrid Aksnes ◽  
Bjørn Torger Stokke

Ring resonator-based biosensors have found widespread application as the transducing principle in “lab-on-a-chip” platforms due to their sensitivity, small size and support for multiplexed sensing. Their sensitivity is, however, not inherently selective towards biomarkers, and surface functionalization of the sensors is key in transforming the sensitivity to be specific for a particular biomarker. There is currently no consensus on process parameters for optimized functionalization of these sensors. Moreover, the procedures are typically optimized on flat silicon oxide substrates as test systems prior to applying the procedure to the actual sensor. Here we present what is, to our knowledge, the first comparison of optimization of silanization on flat silicon oxide substrates to results of protein capture on sensors where all parameters of two conjugation protocols are tested on both platforms. The conjugation protocols differed in the chosen silanization solvents and protein immobilization strategy. The data show that selection of acetic acid as the solvent in the silanization step generally yields a higher protein binding capacity for C-reactive protein (CRP) onto anti-CRP functionalized ring resonator sensors than using ethanol as the solvent. Furthermore, using the BS3 linker resulted in more consistent protein binding capacity across the silanization parameters tested. Overall, the data indicate that selection of parameters in the silanization and immobilization protocols harbor potential for improved biosensor binding capacity and should therefore be included as an essential part of the biosensor development process.


Langmuir ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 1347-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Hollmann ◽  
Thomas Gutberlet ◽  
Claus Czeslik

Author(s):  
L. M. Yusiati ◽  
A. Kurniawati ◽  
C. Hanim ◽  
M. A. Anas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document