scholarly journals Long-term benefit and survival of knee joint distraction as treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S282-S283 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Jansen ◽  
G.S. Van der Weiden ◽  
R.J. Custers ◽  
S.C. Mastbergen ◽  
F.P. Lafeber
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1604-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Jansen ◽  
G.S. van der Weiden ◽  
P.M. Van Roermund ◽  
R.J.H. Custers ◽  
S.C. Mastbergen ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mylène P. Jansen ◽  
Simon C. Mastbergen ◽  
Ronald J. van Heerwaarden ◽  
Sander Spruijt ◽  
Michelle D. van Empelen ◽  
...  

Cartilage ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194760352094294
Author(s):  
Mylène P. Jansen ◽  
Tim A.E.J. Boymans ◽  
Roel J.H. Custers ◽  
Rutger C.I. Van Geenen ◽  
Ronald J. Van Heerwaarden ◽  
...  

Objective Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a joint-preserving osteoarthritis treatment that may postpone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates short- and long-term clinical benefit and tissue structure changes after KJD. Design MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for eligible clinical studies evaluating at least one of the primary parameters: WOMAC, VAS-pain, KOOS, EQ5D, radiographic joint space width or MRI cartilage thickness after KJD. Random effects models were applied on all outcome parameters and outcomes were compared with control groups found in the included studies. Results Eleven articles reporting on 7 different KJD cohorts with in total 127 patients and 5 control groups with multiple follow-up moments were included, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials. Significant improvements in all primary parameters were found and benefit lasted up to at least 9 years. Overall, outcomes were comparable with control groups, including high tibial osteotomy, although TKA showed better clinical response. Conclusions Current, still limited, evidence shows KJD causes clear benefit in clinical and structural parameters, both short- and long-term. Longer follow-up with more patients is necessary, to validate outcome and to potentially improve patient selection for this intensive treatment. Thus far, for younger knee osteoarthritis patients, KJD may be an option to consider.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. S515-S516 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jansen ◽  
S.C. Mastbergen ◽  
M.D. Van Empelen ◽  
E.C. Kester ◽  
F.P. Lafeber ◽  
...  

The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 342-350
Author(s):  
Nobuo Adachi ◽  
Seiju Hayashi ◽  
Atsuo Nakamae ◽  
Masakazu Ishikawa ◽  
Goki Kamei ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Oliviero ◽  
Lorenzo Giordano ◽  
Nicola Maffulli

Abstract Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a most common orthopaedic condition, often complicated by inflammatory features. Sources of data A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Scopus databases (to January 2019) was performed to define the effect obtained in patients with OA of the knee by injections of ozone, on pain and physical function. Six RCTs and 353 patients were included. Areas of agreement Recently, an increasing number of physicians have used ozone therapy to alleviate the symptoms of acute and chronic OA of the knee. Ozone can allow greater mobility of the knee joint, pain relief and decrease in effusion. Areas of controversy The volume and concentration of ozone injected are different in the various treatment protocols published. Growing points The action of ozone is unclear, but it is a promising therapeutic modality capable of impacting, favourably, function and quality of life. Areas timely for developing research The lack of a clear protocol of use is a major limitation, and to date there is no clear evidence of long-term efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
Mylène P. Jansen ◽  
Susanne Maschek ◽  
Ronald J. van Heerwaarden ◽  
Simon C. Mastbergen ◽  
Wolfgang Wirth ◽  
...  

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and knee joint distraction (KJD) are joint-preserving treatments that unload the more affected compartment (MAC) in knee osteoarthritis. This post-hoc study compares two-year cartilage-thickness changes after treatment with KJD vs. HTO, and identifies factors predicting cartilage restoration. Patients indicated for HTO were randomized to KJD (KJDHTO) or HTO treatment. Patients indicated for total knee arthroplasty received KJD (KJDTKA). Outcomes were the MRI mean MAC cartilage thickness and percentage of denuded bone area (dABp) change two years after treatment, using radiographic joint space width (JSW) as the reference. Cohen’s d was used for between-group effect sizes. Post-treatment, KJDHTO patients (n = 18) did not show significant changes. HTO patients (n = 33) displayed a decrease in MAC cartilage thickness and an increase in dABp, but an increase in JSW. KJDTKA (n = 18) showed an increase in MAC cartilage thickness and JSW, and a decrease in dABp. Osteoarthritis severity was the strongest predictor of cartilage restoration. Kellgren–Lawrence grade ≥3 showed significant restoration (p < 0.01) after KJD; grade ≤2 did not. Effect sizes between severe KJD and HTO patients were large for MAC MRI cartilage thickness (d = 1.09; p = 0.005) and dABp (d = 1.13; p = 0.003), but not radiographic JSW (d = 0.28; p = 0.521). This suggests that in knee osteoarthritis patients with high disease severity, KJD may be more efficient in restoring cartilage thickness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 242.1-242
Author(s):  
M. Teunissen ◽  
J. Popov-Celeketic ◽  
K. Coeleveld ◽  
B. Meij ◽  
F. Lafeber ◽  
...  

Background:Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a validated joint-preserving treatment strategy for severe osteoarthritis (OA) that provides long-term clinical and structural improvement. Human trials and animal models indicate clear cartilage regeneration from 6 months and onwards post-KJD [1]. Recent work showed that during distraction, the balance between catabolic and anabolic indicators is directed towards catabolism, as indicated by collagen type 2 markers, proteoglycan (PG) turnover and a catabolic transcription profile.Objectives:To investigate the cartilage changes directly and 10 weeks after joint distraction in order to elucidate the shift from a catabolic to an anabolic cartilage state.Methods:Knee OA was induced bilaterally in 8 dogs according to the groove model. After 10 weeks of OA induction, all 8 animals were treated with knee joint distraction, employing the left knee as an OA control. After 8 weeks of distraction, 4 dogs were euthanized (KJDdirect) and after 10 weeks of follow-up the 4 remaining dogs (KJD+10). Macroscopic and microscopic cartilage degeneration was assessed using the OARSI canine scoring system. RT-qPCR was used to determine relative expression of aggrecan (ACAN)¸collagen type II(COL2α1), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3) in the cartilage. PG content was determined by the Alcian Blue assay and the synthesis of PGs was determined using35SO42-as a tracer, as published before.Results:Macroscopic cartilage damage of the tibial plateau in the KJDdirectgroup was higher as compared to the OA control (OARSI score: 1.7±0.2 vs 0.6±0.3;p < 0.001). For KJD+10this difference persisted (OARSI score: 1.4±0.6 vs 0.6±0.3;p = 0.05). Microscopically, an increase in the total OARSI score was seen after 10 weeks post-KJD. This was mainly due to an increase of chondrocyte clusters at 10 weeks of follow-up, resulting in an increased sub score chondrocyte pathology. Remarkedly the sub score intensity of proteoglycan staining decreased directly after KJD (indicating a loss of PGs) but increased after 10 weeks of follow-up suggesting a mixed response depending on the item scored.Cartilage gene expression analysis showed downregulation ofCOL2α1(-1.3 ± 0.3), ACAN(-4.4 ± 1.0,p < 0.01) andCOMP(-1.7 ± 0.5) in thetgroup compared to OA control suggesting enhanced catabolic activity during KJD. In contrast, after 10 weeks of follow-up the expression ofCOL2α1andCOMPwere increased as compared to the OA control (2.6 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.2 respectively) as well as compared to the KJDdirecsituation (3.3 ± 1.4 and 4.2 ± 2.0).Expression ofMMP3was upregulated directly after KJD (4.4 ± 0.8) and downregulated after 10 weeks of follow up (-3.3 ± 0.8).Biochemical analysis of the tibia cartilage of the KJDdirectgroup revealed a lower PG content compared to the OA joint (20.1±10.3 mg/g vs 23.7±11.7 mg/g). At 10 weeks post-KJD this difference in PG content was gone (24.8±6.8 mg/g vs 25.4±7.8 mg/g). The PG synthesis rate directly after KJD appeared significantly lower vs. OA (1.4±0.6 nmol/h.g vs 5.9±4.4 nmol/h.g;p < 0.001)). 10 weeks post-KJD this difference was not detected (3.7±1.2 nmol/h.g vs 2.9±0.8 nmol/h.g), and the synthesis rate in the distracted knee was increased compared to directly after distraction (p < 0.01) indicating a shift upon follow-up.Conclusion:Further in-depth investigation of the material is ongoing and also includes the other joint tissues such as the bone and the synovial tissue. Irrespective, these first results on cartilage changes suggest that the shift from a catabolic to an anabolic state occurs within the weeksafterjoint distraction. As such, the post-distraction period seems to be essential in identifying key-players that support intrinsic cartilage repair.References:[1]Mastbergen SC, Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 May;9(5):277-90.Acknowledgments:TTW Technology Foundation: Perspectief P15-23, Dutch Arthritis Society: Long term Research Program LLP9Disclosure of Interests:Michelle Teunissen: None declared, Jelena Popov-Celeketic: None declared, Katja Coeleveld: None declared, Bjorn Meij: None declared, Floris Lafeber Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of ArthroSave BV, Marianna Tryfonidou: None declared, Simon Mastbergen: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document