Six-Year Safety and Efficacy Data from Denosumab Phase 2 Extension Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Miller ◽  
Michael Bolognese ◽  
E. Michael Lewiecki ◽  
Richard L. Weinstein ◽  
Beiying Ding ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1466-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karly A Hegge ◽  
Kristin K Horning ◽  
Gregory J Peitz ◽  
Kassy Hegge

Objective: To summarize the role of pharmacotherapy in the management of phenylketonuria (PKU) and to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy data, and safety profile of sapropterin for this indication. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966–May 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–May 2009), and Cochrane database (2008) for the following key words: sapropterin, tetrahydrobiopterin, phenylketonurias, and phenylalanine. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language studies involving humans examining the role of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) in the management of PKU were reviewed to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy data, and safety profile for sapropterin. All Phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of sapropterin were included in this literature evaluation. Data Synthesis: Sapropterin represents the only Food and Drug Administration–approved medication for BH4-responsive PKU, marking an important advance in the treatment of this condition. Among individuals with hyperphenylalaninemia and some residual phenylalanine hydroxylase function, sapropterin can enhance activity of this enzyme to decrease serum phenylalanine concentrations. Sapropterin has been compared with placebo in one Phase 2 and one Phase 3 clinical trial, demonstrating significantly better response rates. Based on available studies, this agent appears to be safe and well tolerated, with adverse event rates similar to those of placebo. However, additional studies are warranted to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of sapropterin therapy. Conclusions: Sapropterin offers a promising therapeutic option for select individuals with BH4-responsive PKU, although long-term data are limited evaluating its safety and efficacy in traditional clinical practice settings. When considering sapropterin therapy, clinicians must consider factors such as cost and patient adherence to drug therapy and/or diet.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Longo ◽  
Roberto Zori ◽  
Melissa P. Wasserstein ◽  
Jerry Vockley ◽  
Barbara K. Burton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
Joseph Muenzer ◽  
Barbara K. Burton ◽  
Paul Harmatz ◽  
Luis González Gutiérrez-Solana ◽  
Matilde Ruiz-Garcia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. S139-S140
Author(s):  
Joseph Muenzer ◽  
Barbara Burton ◽  
Paul Harmatz ◽  
Luis González Gutiérrez-Solana ◽  
Matilde Ruiz-Garcia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201183
Author(s):  
Arthur Kavanaugh ◽  
Rene R. Westhovens ◽  
Kevin L. Winthrop ◽  
Susan J. Lee ◽  
YingMeei Tan ◽  
...  

Objective The long-term safety and efficacy of filgotinib (from phase 2 studies), with or without methotrexate (MTX), for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis was assessed in DARWIN 3, a long-term, open-label extension study (NCT02065700). Methods Eligible patients completing the 24-week DARWIN 1 (filgotinib + MTX) and DARWIN 2 (filgotinib monotherapy) studies entered DARWIN 3, where they received filgotinib 200 mg/day, except for 15 men who received filgotinib 100 mg/day. Safety analyses were performed using the safety analysis set and exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was calculated. Efficacy was assessed from baseline in the parent studies. Results Of 790 patients completing the phase 2 parent studies, 739 enrolled in the study. Through April 2019, 59.5% of patients had received ≥4 years of study drug. Mean (SD) exposure to filgotinib was 3.55 (1.57) years in the filgotinib + MTX group and 3.38 (1.59) years in the filgotinib monotherapy group. EAIR per 100 patient years of exposure (PYE) for TEAEs was 24.6 in the filgotinib + MTX group and 25.8 in the filgotinib monotherapy group, and for serious TEAEs, the EAIR was 3.1 and 4.3, respectively. ACR20/50/70 responses among patients remaining in the study could be maintained through 4 years, with 89.3%/69.6%/49.1% of filgotinib + MTX group and 91.8%/69.4%/44.4% of monotherapy group maintaining ACR20/50/70 responses based on observed data. Conclusion Filgotinib was well tolerated with a 4-year safety profile comparable to that of the parent trials, both in patients receiving combination therapy with MTX or as monotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document