Language barrier as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury – a Case-Control Study

Author(s):  
Stephanie Schrot-Sanyan ◽  
Kamila Kolanska ◽  
Yousra Haimeur ◽  
Valentin Varlas ◽  
Laure Parisot-Liance ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Klokk ◽  
Kjersti Bakken ◽  
Trond Markestad ◽  
Mads Holten-Andersen

Objective To identify modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for severe obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) following vaginal delivery. Design Retrospective case-control study. Setting Single center maternity clinic in South-Eastern Norway Population Women diagnosed with OASI following singleton vaginal birth after 30 weeks’ gestation (n = 421) and matched controls (n = 421) during 1990-2002. Methods Data were extracted retrospectively from an institutional birth registry. For each woman with OASI the first subsequent vaginal singleton delivery matched for parity was elected as control. Potential determinants for OASI were assessed by conditional logistic regression analyses. Main outcome measure OASI, defined as 3rd or 4th degree obstetric anal sphincter lesions. Results Among modifiable factors amniotomy was the strongest independent determinant for OASI in both primi- (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.84; 95% CI 2.60–9.02) and multiparous (aOR 3.76; 95% CI 1.45–9.76) women, followed by augmentation with oxytocin (primiparous: aOR 1.63; 95% CI 1.08–2.46, multiparous: aOR 3.70; 95% CI 1.79–7.67). Vacuum extraction and forceps delivery were independently associated with OASI in primiparous women (vacuum: aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.03–3.57, forceps: aOR 2.37; 95% CI 1.14–4.92), and episiotomy for OASI in multiparous women (aOR 2.64; 95% CI 1.36–5.14). Conclusions Amniotomy may be a hitherto unrecognized independent modifiable risk factor for OASI and should be further investigated for its potential role in preventive strategies for OASI. Funding Innlandet Hospital Trust research fund, grant number 150434. Keywords Obstetric anal sphincter injury; OASI; Birth; Birth injury; Modifiable risk factor; Amniotomy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Simó González ◽  
Oriol Porta Roda ◽  
Josep Perelló Capó ◽  
Ignasi Gich Saladich ◽  
Joaquim Calaf Alsina

The aim of this study was to analyze the comparative risks of this anal sphincter injury in relation to the type of intervention in vaginal delivery. We performed an observational, retrospective study of all vaginal deliveries attended at a tertiary university hospital between January 2006 and December 2009. We analyzed the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury for each mode of vaginal delivery: spontaneous delivery, vacuum, Thierry spatulas, and forceps. We determined the proportional incidence between methods taking spontaneous delivery as the reference. Ninety-seven of 4526 (2.14%) women included in the study presented obstetric anal sphincter injury. Instrumental deliveries showed a significantly higher risk of anal sphincter injury (2.7 to 4.9%) than spontaneous deliveries (1.1%). The highest incidence was for Thierry spatulas (OR 4.804), followed by forceps (OR 4.089) and vacuum extraction (OR 2.509). The type of intervention in a vaginal delivery is a modifiable intrapartum risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Tearing can occur in any type of delivery but proportions vary significantly. All healthcare professionals attending childbirth should be aware of the risk for each type of intervention and consider these together with the obstetric factors in each case.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Simó González ◽  
J. Cassadó Garriga ◽  
C. Dosouto Capel ◽  
O. Porta Roda ◽  
J. Perelló Capó ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document