Predictors of Change in Pain and Physical Functioning Among Post-Menopausal Women With Recurrent Pain Conditions in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort

Background: Heart failure (HF), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women, continues to disproportionately affect African-American (AA) women compared to women of other races/ethnicities. In a large cohort of post-menopausal women, we investigated if AA women progress through HF stages and coronary heart disease (CHD) death more rapidly than Caucasian (Cau) or Hispanic/Latina (HL) women. Methods: We assessed the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) HF stage A upon enrollment into the Women’s Health Initiative (1993-1998) and the progression from Stage A to Stage C, Stage C to CHD death, up to the last date of follow-up (2010). Cox proportional hazard regressions models were used to assess disease progression risk. We adjusted for age, baseline comorbidities, duration of comorbidities, interval development of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction at HF diagnosis, socioeconomic factors, and sex specific variables. Results: At baseline, AA women were younger and had a higher percentage of Stage A HF (76%) than Cau (54%) and HL (55%) women. Overall, AA and HL women had significantly lower risk of progressing from Stage A to Stage C compared to Cau women [AA vs. Cau adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.77 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.64 -0.93) p = 0.0055; HL vs. Cau HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.40 -0.71) p < 0.0001]. After stratifying by age groups(<65, 65-69, >70 years), AA women had a similar risk of progression from stage A to C compared to Cau women. When compared to Cau women, AA had an insignificant increased risk of progressing from Stage C to CHD death [adjusted HR 1.29 (95% CI 0.72 -2.32) p = 0.3883)]. Conclusions: Cau women were at higher risk for HF progression from Stage A to Stage C compared to HL women, but at similar risk as AA women. AA women had an insignificant but increased risk of progression from Stage C to CHD death compared to Cau women.

Download Full-text

Abstract 835: COPD and risk of lung cancer in post-menopausal women: findings from the Women's Health Initiative

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-835 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Michele L. Cote ◽

Amy Lehman ◽

Rowen Chlebowski ◽

Brittany Haynes ◽

Gloria Ho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Women’S Health ◽

Women's Health ◽

Women's Health Initiative ◽

Women’S Health Initiative ◽

Health Initiative ◽

Menopausal Women ◽

Post Menopausal ◽

The Women’S Health Initiative

Download Full-text

Prevalence and penetrance of breast cancer-associated mutations identified by multiple-gene sequencing in the Women’s Health Initiative.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1513 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 1513-1513

Author(s):

Allison W. Kurian ◽

Elisha Hughes ◽

Ryan Bernhisel ◽

Katie Larson ◽

Jennifer Lee Caswell-Jin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Women's Health ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cancer Susceptibility ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Women's Health Initiative ◽

Health Initiative ◽

Menopausal Women ◽

Post Menopausal ◽

The Women’S Health Initiative

1513 Background: Next-generation sequencing enables rapid analysis of many inherited cancer susceptibility genes. Little is known about the prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic variants (PVs) in such genes among post-menopausal women with breast cancer, who comprise the majority of all breast cancer patients. Methods: The Women’s Health Initiative enrolled post-menopausal women from 1993-1998. We conducted a nested case-control study using banked DNA samples of 2,195 women who subsequently developed invasive breast cancer (cases) and 2,322 cancer-free controls. Sequenced genes were APC, ATM, BARD1, BMPR1A, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CDK4, CDKN2A (p16INK4a and p14ARF) , CHEK2, EPCAM, GREM1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, POLD1, POLE, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53. PV were defined using American College of Medical Genetics criteria. PV prevalence is reported as proportions and penetrance as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of PV versus none among cases versus controls. Results: Among cases, the median age at diagnosis was 73 years; 66% were White, 18% Black, 6% Hispanic, 6% Asian and 4% other. The prevalence of PVs in any gene was significantly higher in cases (6.61%, 95% CI 5.57-7.65%) versus controls (4.09%, 95% CI 3.29-4.90%). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 1.2% in cases and 0.22% in controls. Among cases, the prevalence of PVs in other breast cancer-risk genes was 2.3% ( ATM, CDH1, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, and PALB2 collectively), two-fold higher than PVs in BRCA1/2. Prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs decreased with age among cases, while prevalence of ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 PVs did not. Statistically significant ORs for breast cancer penetrance were observed for BRCA1 (5.43, 95% CI 1.19-51.52), BRCA2 (4.71, 95% CI 1.84-15.08), BARD1 (9.78, 95% CI 1.04-1295.87) and PALB2 (6.30, 95% CI 1.93-31.94). Conclusions: Approximately 7% of women diagnosed with post-menopausal breast cancer carry a PV in a cancer susceptibility gene. In contrast to studies of younger breast cancer patients, PVs in other breast cancer-related genes were two times more common than in BRCA1/2. Results may guide genetic testing of women with post-menopausal breast cancer.

Download Full-text