Validation and Application of the Chinese Version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer Module (MDASI-GI-C)

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 820-827
Author(s):  
Ren-wang Chen ◽  
Sheng-li Yang ◽  
Zhong-yu Xu ◽  
Miao Peng ◽  
Meng-ni Chen ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyi Hu ◽  
Juxiang Gou ◽  
Ming Cai ◽  
Yueer Zhang

Abstract Aim To translate and validate the Chinese version of the MDASI-THY among thyroid cancer patients. Background The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Thyroid Cancer module (MDASI-THY) is one of well-validated instruments for thyroid-specific symptom assessment. To date, the instrument has not been used in China. Methods After standard forward- and back-translation procedures, two instruments, the Chinese version of MDASI-THY and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30, were answered by 309 thyroid patients. The content, convergent discriminant validity and reliability of the MDASI-THY were evaluated. The Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) was used as reporting checklist. Results S-CVI and I-CVI of the instrument were over 0.80. There were significant relationships between MDASI-THY and EORTC QLQ-C30 (p<0.001). Symptoms were severer for patients underwent surgical treatment. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.966 (between 0.954 and 0.827 for subscales). Most symptom items had moderate to high interitem correlations. Conclusions The Chinese version of MDASI-THY demonstrated favorable validity and reliability. It can be used in development of symptom management program in thyroid cancer patients in China. Relevance to clinical practice: Nurse can apply this instrument to assess Chinese thyroid cancer patients to increase the understanding of their symptom experience, resulting in a better symptom management.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Ying-ying Zheng ◽  
Zhi-rong Yang ◽  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Gynecologic cancers are among the most prevalent malignancies in China, and millions of gynecologic cancer patients are expected to undergo open abdominal surgery as initial treatment. The tumor- and surgery-related symptom burden are not well studied owing to a lack of a standardized and validated assessment tool in Chinese. The study was to translate and validate the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for measuring perioperative symptom burden in gynecologic cancer patients (MDASI-PeriOp-GYN) and examine the utility of the Chinese version.Methods: The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN was translated in a stepwise manner. First, two native speakers independently translated the 9 PeriOp-GYN symptom items. Then the 9 items were translated back into English by another two bilingual translators. After discussion and revision, the four translators reached an agreement. The finalized Chinese version was administered to women with three common gynecologic cancer types (cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers) recruited from the gynecological oncology department of Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute between July and October 2019. Reliability and validity of the translated version were assessed. Results: Overall, 324 women with gynecologic cancers were enrolled. Cronbach’s α values were 0.826 and 0.735 for the symptom severity and interference scales, respectively. Test-retest reliability values were 0.885, 0.873, and 0.914 for the symptom severity, PeriOp-GYN, and interference scales, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the MDASI-PeriOp-GYN-C and EORTC QLQ-C30 along with the QLQ-OV28 module (-0.608–0.871, P<0.001). Known-group validity was supported by significant differences in the scores of the four scales grouped by time intervals, surgery type, and functional status (all P<0.01). Conclusions: The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN-C is a valid and reliable tool for measuring symptoms in Chinese patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancers. The tool could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to instantly gather patients’ health and quality of life data.


Oncology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahima Gning ◽  
Peter C. Trask ◽  
Tito R. Mendoza ◽  
Margaret T. Harle ◽  
Karla A. Gutierrez ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (15-16) ◽  
pp. 2224-2232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Chung Pien ◽  
Hsin Chu ◽  
Wen-Chun Chen ◽  
Yu-Shiun Chang ◽  
Yuan-Mei Liao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Ying-ying Zheng ◽  
Zhi-rong Yang ◽  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gynecologic cancers are among the most prevalent malignancies in China. Cervical and uterine cancer respectively account for the sixth and eighth highest incidence of cancer among Chinese women. Abdominal surgery is one of the important treatment methods for gynecological tumors. However, the tumor- and surgery-related symptom burden are not well studied owing to a lack of a standardized and validated assessment tool in the Chinese population. The study aimed to translate and validate the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for measuring perioperative symptom burden in gynecologic cancer patients (MDASI-PeriOp-GYN) and examine the utility of the Chinese version of MDASI-PeriOp-GYN. Methods The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN was translated in a stepwise manner. First, two native speakers independently translated the 9 PeriOp-GYN symptom items. Then the nine items were translated back into English by two different bilingual translators. After discussion and revision, the four translators reached an agreement. Finally, the finalized Chinese version was administered to women with three common gynecologic cancer types (cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers) recruited from the gynecological oncology department of Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute between July and October 2019. The reliability and validity of the translated version were assessed. Results Overall, 324 women with gynecologic cancers were enrolled. Cronbach’s α values were 0.826 and 0.735 for the symptom severity and interference scales, respectively. Test–retest reliability values were 0.885, 0.873, and 0.914 for symptom severity, PeriOp-GYN, and interference scales. Significant correlations were found between the MDASI-PeriOp-GYN-C and EORTC QLQ-C30 along with the QLQ-OV28 module (− 0.608–0.871, P < 0.001). Known-group validity was supported by significant differences in the scores of the four scales grouped by time intervals, surgery type, and functional status (all P < 0.01). Conclusions The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN-C is a valid and reliable tool for measuring symptoms in Chinese patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancers. The tool could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to instantly gather patients’ health and quality of life data.


Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 1890-1901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Hong Guo ◽  
Tito R. Mendoza ◽  
Xi-Shan Hao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. E66-E72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Cheung William Li ◽  
Phoebe D. Williams ◽  
Arthur R. Williams ◽  
Joyce O. K. Chung ◽  
Sau Ying Chiu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document