Slower speed-of-processing of cognitive tasks is associated with presence of the apolipoprotein ε4 allele

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth O’Hara ◽  
Barbara Sommer ◽  
Nate Way ◽  
Helena C. Kraemer ◽  
Joy Taylor ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S886-S886
Author(s):  
Ganesh Babulal

Abstract Decline in driving skills begins in preclinical AD, when an older adult remains cognitively normal, but the underlying disease process has begun. Preclinical AD is detectable among cognitively normal individuals using molecular biomarkers: positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The aim of this prospective, longitudinal study is to determine whether naturalistic driving behavior using in-vehicle dataloggers can distinguish older adults with (n=36) and without preclinical AD (n=134). Driving data was calculated as mean/month for several variables (number of trips/day, trip length, trip time, speeding, and hard-braking) for participants followed between one to 46 months. Using stepwise logistic regression, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval for these five variables was 0.73 (0.63-0.79) in distinguishing those with and without preclinical AD via amyloid imaging. When age, gender, race, and education were added, the model improved: 0.80 (0.72-0.88). Finally, when apolipoprotein ε4 allele (APOε4), obtained via blood or saliva, was added to the model, accuracy improved: 0.84 (0.77-0.89). Similar results were found using CSF biomarker tau/Aβ42: AUCs (95% CI) were 0.68 (0.58-0.79) for driving variables alone, 0.77 (0.69-0.86) for driving variables and demographics, and 0.87 (0.80-0.94) driving variables, demographics, and apolipoprotein ε4 allele. These promising findings suggest that naturalistic driving behavior can predict those with and without preclinical AD. The AUC is further improved with demographics and APOε4, an easily obtainable genetic biomarker. This model may be used in clinical/research settings as a screen or adjunct for diagnostics and prognostics purposes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1008-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Wiegman ◽  
Eric J G Sijbrands ◽  
Jessica Rodenburg ◽  
Joep C Defesche ◽  
Saskia de Jongh ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 677-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari H. Stengård ◽  
Juha Pekkanen ◽  
Christian Ehnholm ◽  
Aulikki Nissinen ◽  
Charles F. Sing

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 516-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Arendt ◽  
Cornelia Schindler ◽  
Martina K. Brückner ◽  
Klaus Eschrich ◽  
Volker Bigl ◽  
...  

Neuroreport ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (18) ◽  
pp. 2518-2520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilkka Soininen ◽  
Maarit Lehtovirta ◽  
Seppo Helisalmi ◽  
Katja Linnaranta ◽  
Outi Heinonen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 302 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Coto-Segura ◽  
Eliecer Coto ◽  
Victoria Alvarez ◽  
Jorge Santos-Juanes

2009 ◽  
Vol 302 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Coto-Segura ◽  
Eliecer Coto ◽  
Victoria Alvarez ◽  
Blanca Morales ◽  
Javier Soto-Sánchez ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-673
Author(s):  
Helen Lavretsky ◽  
Linda Ercoli ◽  
Prabha Siddarth ◽  
Susan Bookheimer ◽  
Karen Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document