Influences of online store perception, shopping enjoyment, and shopping involvement on consumer patronage behavior towards an online retailer

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihyun Kim ◽  
Ann Marie Fiore ◽  
Hyun-Hwa Lee
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Essy Malays Sari Sakti ◽  
Asril Basry

Aplikasi rekening bersama adalah aplikasi yang dibangun  untuk menghubungkan antara pembeli, penjual dan admin rekening bersama yang terintegrasi dengan baik, guna menghindari adanya kecurangan antara pembeli dan penjual. Penelitian ini merupakan pengembangan dari penelitian terdahulu, yang mana penelitian terdahulu mengggunakan dua komunikasi yaitu front end communication dan back end communication. Front end communication merupakan komunikasi antara pembeli, penjual dan admin rekening bersama yang dilakukan melalui aplikasi yang dibangun  sedangkan  back end communication merupakan komunikasi   yang dilakukan diluar dari aplikasi tersebut misalnya komunikasi antara admin rekeningg bersama dengan  kurir/ perusahaan pengiriman barang yang dilakukan merlalui telepon dan fax.  Pada penelitian ini  komuniksi antara pembeli, penjual dan admin  rekening bersama  dan  kurir/perusahaan pengiriman barang,  dilakukan hanya melalui aplikasi rekening bersama ( front end communication) . Dengan metode WDLC ( Web Development Life Cycle ). , dimana tahap pertama diawali dengan menganalisis dan mengevaluasi kembali aplikasi terdahulu untuk ditelaah lebih jauh  serta melanjutkan pengembangan perancangan dan  pengembangan aplikasi. Tahap ujicoba dilakukan dengan mengakses sebagai pembeli, penjual dan  admin rekening bersama dan kurir . Hasil yang didapat bahwa komunikasi antara pembeli, penjual dan admin rekening bersama  serta kurir dapat dilakukan secara frond end communiacation  atau komunikasi dilakukan hanya melalui aplikasi rekening bersama saja.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002224372110202
Author(s):  
Shrabastee Banerjee ◽  
Chris Dellarocas ◽  
Georgios Zervas

This article studies the question and answer (Q&A) technology of electronic commerce platforms, an increasingly common form of user-generated content that allows consumers to publicly ask product-specific questions and receive responses, either from the platform or from other customers. Using data from a major online retailer, the authors show that Q&As complement consumer reviews: unlike reviews, questions are primarily asked pre-purchase and focus on clarification of product attributes rather than discussion of quality; answers convey fit-specific information in a predominantly sentiment-free way. Based on these observations, the authors hypothesize that Q&As mitigate product fit uncertainty, leading to better matches between products and consumers, and therefore improved product ratings. Indeed, when products suffering from fit mismatch start receiving Q&As, their subsequent ratings improve by approximately 0.1 to 0.5 stars and the fraction of negative reviews that discuss fit-related issues declines. The extent of the rating increase due to Q&As is proportional to the probability that purchasers will experience fit mismatch without Q&A. These findings suggest that, by resolving product fit uncertainty in an e-commerce setting, the addition of Q&As can be a viable way for retailers to improve ratings of products that have incurred low ratings due to customer-product fit mismatch.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Gediminas Adomavicius ◽  
Jesse Bockstedt ◽  
Shawn Curley ◽  
Jingjing Zhang

Prior research has shown a robust effect of personalized product recommendations on user preference judgments for items. Specifically, the display of system-predicted preference ratings as item recommendations has been shown in multiple studies to bias users’ preference ratings after item consumption in the direction of the predicted rating. Top-N lists represent another common approach for presenting item recommendations in recommender systems. Through three controlled laboratory experiments, we show that top-N lists do not induce a discernible bias in user preference judgments. This result is robust, holding for both lists of personalized item recommendations and lists of items that are top-rated based on averages of aggregate user ratings. Adding numerical ratings to the list items does generate a bias, consistent with earlier studies. Thus, in contexts where preference biases are of concern to an online retailer or platform, top-N lists, without numerical predicted ratings, would be a promising format for displaying item recommendations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 517-524
Author(s):  
Matthias Horn ◽  
Nikolaus Frohner ◽  
Günther R. Raidl

2005 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Jon L. Holmes
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document