Long-term survivorship and outcomes after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Millett ◽  
Marilee P. Horan ◽  
Katie E. Maland ◽  
Richard J. Hawkins
Orthopedics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Danielle G. Weekes ◽  
Richard E. Campbell ◽  
Jordan R. Allegretto ◽  
Samantha G. Lopez ◽  
Matthew D. Pepe ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
S. Jacobs ◽  
H. Williams ◽  
J. Moir ◽  
B. Welsh ◽  
R. P. Welch

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Vincent ◽  
Olivier Gagey ◽  
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

Abstract Background and Hypotheses: The contemporary research literature indicates that there is no significant clinical difference in terms of improvement of pain and functional disability between surgical repair and rehabilitation treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears. It could be hypothesized that rehabilitation, which is cheaper and causes few complications, is preferable for smaller lesions, whereas surgical repair might be needed for the larger lesions. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the size of the tear, particularly the large or massive, plays a major role in terms of long-term clinical results for rehabilitation compared to surgical repair.Method: We searched the literature on PubMed, Embase, PEDro, and Cochrane Library database up to March 2020 for randomized controlled clinical trials that compared long term results for surgical vs. rehabilitation concerning large or massive degenerative rotator cuff tears. A systematic, critical review process was planned using a slightly modified SIGN checklist. The review methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was submitted to PROSPERO and registered under the number CRD42020146161.Results: We found no randomized clinical trials that had dealt with this subject.Conclusion: There is no evidence that would help to choose between surgical repair or rehabilitation in case of large or massive rotator cuff degenerative tears. The reason for this is probably that large tears may be relatively painless since they often occur after retirement and therefore are relatively rarely seen in clinical practice. To obtain enough study subjects, it would therefore be necessary to study this question in multicenter randomized clinical trials.


1993 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 278-280
Author(s):  
Toshiro Kotake ◽  
Yoshio Kataoka ◽  
Taku Mihara ◽  
Ryu Tarumoto

Author(s):  
Robert A Jack ◽  
Michael C Ciccotti ◽  
Steven B Cohen ◽  
Michael G Ciccotti

Author(s):  
Aniket Agarwal ◽  
Kavita Vani ◽  
Anurag Batta ◽  
Kavita Verma ◽  
Shishir Chumber

Abstract Background Objectives: To comparatively evaluate the role of ultrasound and MRI in rotator cuff and biceps tendon pathologies and to establish ultrasound as a consistently reproducible, quick and accurate primary investigation modality sufficient to triage patients requiring surgical correction of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Methods: Fifty patients, clinically suspected to have rotator cuff and/or biceps tendon pathologies, with no contraindications to MRI, were evaluated by US and MRI, in a prospective cross-sectional observational study. US was done with high-frequency linear probe, and MRI was done on a 1.5-T scanner using T1 oblique sagittal, proton density (PD)/T2 fat-suppressed (FS) oblique sagittal, T1 axial, PD/T2 FS axial, T1 oblique coronal, T2 oblique coronal and PD FS oblique coronal sequences. Statistical testing was conducted with the statistical package for the social science system version SPSS 17.0. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were also calculated to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of US findings correlating with MRI findings. A p value less than 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference. Results Mean age was 45 years; 74% patients were males; 77% females and 60% males had tears. Majority of patients with rotator cuff tears were in the sixth decade of life. The frequency of tears was higher among older patients. Fourteen percent of patients had full thickness tears while 64% had partial thickness tears. US was comparable to MRI for detection of full thickness tears with overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and accuracy of 93.8%, 100%, 100% and 98.2%, respectively (p value < 0.001). For partial thickness tears, US had overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and accuracy of 75.6%, 82.6%, 89.5% and 78%, respectively (p value < 0.001), as compared to MRI. Subacromial-subdeltoid bursal effusion and long head of biceps tendon sheath effusion were common associated, though, non-specific findings. Conclusion Ultrasound findings in our study were found to be in significant correlation with findings on MRI in detection of rotator cuff tears. US was equivalent to MRI in detection of full thickness tears and fairly accurate for partial thickness tears. Therefore, US should be considered as the first line of investigation for rotator cuff pathologies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document