Decision making for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of the applicability of our new evidence based algorithm

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. e175
Author(s):  
Bernhard Jost ◽  
Vilijam Zdravkovic ◽  
Christian Spross
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
New Evidence

Outcomes of Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Patient-Specific, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Spross ◽  
Vilijam Zdravkovic ◽  
Melanie Manser ◽  
Jan Marino Farei-Campagna ◽  
Matthijs Jacxsens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

scholarly journals The Axillary View Typically Does Not Contribute to Decision Making in Care for Proximal Humeral Fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marschall B. Berkes ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
Jacqueline F. Birnbaum ◽  
Lionel E. Lazaro ◽  
Tristan C. Lorich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures

Decision-Making in Proximal Humeral Fractures

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-83
Author(s):  
Yaser Jabbar ◽  
Addie Majed ◽  
Anne Hsu ◽  
Paul Fairhurs ◽  
Ivo Vlaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures

The factors influencing the decision making of operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. e21-e26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel G.J.S. Hageman ◽  
Prakash Jayakumar ◽  
John D. King ◽  
Thierry G. Guitton ◽  
Job N. Doornberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Factors Influencing

Abstraction: An alternative neurocognitive account of recognition, prediction, and decision making

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Software Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Trace Theory ◽  
Fuzzy Trace Theory ◽  
Abstract Representations ◽  
Technical Systems

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document