Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20%

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 866-872
Author(s):  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Tomás Gorodischer ◽  
Ignacio Pasqualini ◽  
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rugby Players

Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%, both the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to sport at the same level they had before the injury. However, the Bankart procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence (20% vs 4%) and reoperation (16% vs 4%) than the Latarjet procedure.

Return to sports, functional outcomes, and recurrences after arthroscopic Bankart repair in soccer players

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322092892
Author(s):  
Ignacio Pasqualini ◽  
Luciano A Rossi ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Keyword(s):  
Scoring System ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Background There is a shortage of relevant reports about the results obtained after shoulder stabilization in soccer players. Therefore, this retrospective study aims to report return to sports, functional outcomes, and recurrences after arthroscopic Bankart repair in soccer players. Methods A total of 156 soccer players were treated for anterior shoulder instability at a single institution between 2008 and 2017. The Rowe score and Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System were used to assess functional outcomes. Return to sport and recurrence rates were also evaluated. Results The Rowe and Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System scores showed statistical improvement after surgery (P < .001). Overall, 148 soccer players (94.8%) returned to sports, and 122 (78.2%) returned to the same level. The mean time to return to sport was 4.8 months. The recurrence rate was 5.2%. Discussion Soccer players who underwent an arthroscopic isolated Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability have shown remarkable outcomes, with most of the patients returning to sports, and at the same level they had before surgery with a low rate of recurrence.

scholarly journals When to Abandon the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-430
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Levy ◽  
Nathan L. Grimm ◽  
Robert A. Arciero
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Humeral Head ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Context: Bone loss is a major factor in determining surgical choice in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. Although bone loss has been described, there is no consensus on glenoid, humeral head, and bipolar bone loss limits for which arthroscopic-only management with Bankart repair can be performed. Objective: To provide guidelines for selecting a more complex repair or reconstruction (in lieu of arthroscopic-only Bankart repair) in the setting of glenohumeral instability based on available literature. Data Sources: An electronic search of the literature for the period from 2000 to 2019 was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE). Study Selection: Studies were included if they quantified bone loss (humeral head or glenoid) in the setting of anterior instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, follow-up, recurrence rates, and measures of bone loss (glenoid, humeral head, bipolar). Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 measured glenoid bone loss, 5 measured humeral head bone loss, and 2 measured “tracking” without explicit measurement of humeral head bone loss. Measurement techniques for glenoid and humeral head bone loss varied widely. Recommendations for maximum glenoid bone loss for arthroscopic repair were largely <15% of glenoid width in recent studies. Recommendations regarding humeral head loss were more variable (many authors providing only qualitative descriptions) with increasing attention on glenohumeral tracking. Conclusion: It is essential that a standardized method of glenoid and humeral head bone loss measurements be performed preoperatively to assess which patients will have successful stabilization after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Glenoid bone loss should be <15%, and humeral head lesions should be “on track” if an arthroscopic-only Bankart is planned. If there is greater bone loss, adjunct or open procedures should be performed.

Modified Latarjet Without Capsulolabral Repair in Rugby Players With Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability and Significant Glenoid Bone Loss

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Ranalletta ◽  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Agustin Bertona ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Ignacio Alonso Hidalgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Block ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Rugby Players ◽  
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: The optimal management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss in high-demand collision athletes remains a challenge. Purpose: To analyze the time to return to sport, clinical outcomes, and recurrences following a modified Latarjet procedure without capsulolabral repair in rugby players with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and significant glenoid bone loss. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between June 2008 and June 2015, 50 competitive rugby players (practice >2 times per week and competition during weekends) with recurrent anterior shoulder instability underwent operation with the modified congruent arc Latarjet procedure without capsulolabral repair in our institution. Cases included 18 primary repairs and 32 revisions. Return to sports, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, a visual analog scale for pain in sport activity (VAS), and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences were also evaluated. The postoperative bone block position and consolidation were assessed with computed tomography. The final analysis included 49 shoulders in 48 patients (31 revision cases). Results: The mean follow-up was 48 months (range, 24-108 months) and the mean age at the time of operation was 22.8 years (range, 17-35 years). Forty-five patients (93.7%) returned to playing rugby, all at their preinjury level of play. No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe, VAS, and ASOSS scores showed statistically significant improvement after operation ( P < .001). The Rowe score increased from a mean of 39.5 points preoperatively to 94 points postoperatively ( P < .01). The VAS score decreased from 3.6 points preoperatively to 1.2 points postoperatively ( P < .01). The ASOSS score improved significantly from a mean of 44 points preoperatively to 89.5 points postoperatively ( P < .01). No recurrence of shoulder dislocation or subluxation was noted. The bone block healed in 43 shoulders (88%). Conclusion: In rugby players with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and significant glenoid bone loss, the modified Latarjet procedure without capsulolabral repair produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to rugby at their preinjury level of play without recurrences.

The playing position significantly influences return to sports and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive rugby players

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322199308
Author(s):  
Ignacio Pasqualini ◽  
Luciano Andrés Rossi ◽  
Franco Luis De Cicco ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Ignacio Alonso Hidalgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
The Other ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Rugby Players

Background The purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of the different rugby playing positions on return to sports, functional outcomes, and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods A total of 88 rugby players were treated for anterior shoulder instability in our institution between 2010 and 2018. Functional outcomes, return to sports, recurrences, complications, and revisions rates were evaluated according to the playing position. Results Overall, 73.8% of the patients returned to rugby and 60% returned at the same level as before the injury. The tight forwards and outside backs experienced a significant decrease in their competitive level after surgery, and showed the lowest functional outcomes. The tight forwards and outside backs showed a statistically significant increase in recurrence and revision rates, and an OR for recurrence of 12.8 and 9.6, respectively. Discussion The playing position significantly influenced return to sports and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive rugby players. Specifically, the tight forwards and outside backs have returned to a lower level than they had before surgery, showed the lowest functional outcomes, and a significant increase in recurrences and revisions rates than the other groups.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman D Algarni
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) using two types of knotless suture anchors (KSAs) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability (AGHI). Methods: Thirty-two patients underwent an ABR using KSAs: a permanent KSA (PushLock) and an absorbable counterpart (BioKnotless). There were 16 patients in each group. Pre-and post-operative assessment for shoulder function using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant–Murley scores, recurrence of instability, post-operative limitation of external rotation (ER) and ability to return to pre-injury level were recorded in both groups. Results: Both groups displayed significant improvements in functional scores ( p < 0.0001) without a significant difference between the groups. Of the 32 patients, 9.4% had recurrence of instability (one re-dislocation in group 1 and two symptomatic subluxations in group 2). Return to pre-injury level occurred in 87.5% and 81.3% of group 1 and group 2, respectively. There was 2° to 3° loss of ER after ABR in both groups; the difference between the groups was not significant ( p = 0.45). Conclusion: ABR for recurrent AGHI using a permanent or absorbable KSA offers comparable successful outcomes; no significant statistical difference was found.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart Repair vs. Open Latarjet Procedure: A Comparative Study of Clinical and Functional Results.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Sherchan ◽  
Saroj Rai ◽  
Nira Tamang ◽  
Siddhartha Dhungana ◽  
Laxmi Kanta Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Operating Cost ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quick Dash

Abstract Background The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedure for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Secondary aims were to assess and compare the cost-effectiveness, satisfaction and complications, including recurrence and infection. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the patients who underwent either arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without Remplissage procedure or open Latarjet procedure between May 2015 and May 2018. The preoperative data were collected from the hospital records, and the postoperative data were collected during the follow-up visit. At the final follow-up, 41(male=32, female=9) patients in the Bankart group and 40(male=34 and female=6) patients in the Latarjet group were included in the study. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the ASES score, Rowe score, and Quick DASH score. A self-constructed scale that consisted of satisfied and dissatisfied was used to measure the level of satisfaction. Any complications were recorded in every follow-up visit. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results There was no statistically significant difference regarding the age (p=0.401), gender (p=0.569), site of involvement (p=0.158), number of preoperative dislocations (p=0.085), follow-up (p=0.061), between the two groups. Similarly, no statistically significant difference existed regarding the ASES score (p=0.388), Rowe score (p=0.211), and Quick DASH score (p=0.713). The average external rotation was 83 degrees in the Bankart group and 85 degrees in the Latarjet group (p=0.140). Functional satisfaction was higher in the Laterjet group compared to the Bankart group (p=0.482). Hundred percent of the patients were cosmetically satisfied in the Bankart group, whereas only 32(80%) patients were cosmetically satisfied in the Latarjet group (p=0.002). There was a significantly higher operating cost for arthroscopic Bankart repair compared to open Latarjet procedure (p<0.001). Three patients had a recurrence in the Bankart group, whereas no recurrence occurred in the Latarjet group. And, 2 superficial infections occurred in the Latarjet group. Conclusion These results provide the fact that arthroscopic Bankart repair might be a fancy and minimally invasive procedure, Latarjet procedure should still be a priority in a developing country like Nepal, where financial cost is a huge burden.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document