Two-stage estimation of inequality-constrained marginal linear models with longitudinal data

2008 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
pp. 1905-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Jinde Wang
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvid Sjolander ◽  
Torben Martinussen

Abstract Instrumental variables is a popular method in epidemiology and related fields, to estimate causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. Traditionally, instrumental variable analyses have been confined to linear models, in which the causal parameter of interest is typically estimated with two-stage least squares. Recently, the methodology has been extended in several directions, including two-stage estimation and so-called G-estimation in nonlinear (e. g. logistic and Cox proportional hazards) models. This paper presents a new R package, ivtools, which implements many of these new instrumental variable methods. We briefly review the theory of two-stage estimation and G-estimation, and illustrate the functionality of the ivtools package by analyzing publicly available data from a cohort study on vitamin D and mortality.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Li Chen

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Longitudinal data contain repeated measurements of variables on the same experimental subject. It is often of interest to analyze the relationship between these variables. Typically, there is one or several longitudinal covariates and a response variable that can be either longitudinal or time to an event. Regression models can be employed to analyze these relationships. Ideally, longitudinal variables should be continuously monitored and their complete trajectories along the time are observed. Practically, however, this is unrealistic, either economically or methodologically. Often one only obtains so called sparse longitudinal data, where variables are intermittently observed at relatively sparse time points within the period of study. Such sparse longitudinal data give rise to an issue for the analysis of the response of time to an event, where survival analysis is typically implemented, e.g. the Cox model or additive hazards model. In both models, the values of covariates of all subjects at risk are needed in order to calculate the partial likelihood. But in the case of sparse longitudinal data, the availability of these observations may not be satis fied. Moreover, if the response variable is also longitudinal, it is possible that the response and covariates are not observed altogether, or at least not close to each other enough to be considered as observed simultaneously. Although a wealth of studies have been dedicated to longitudinal data analysis, very few of them have seriously considered and rigorously studied the situation aforementioned. In this dissertation, we discuss the regression analysis of longitudinal cavities with censored and longitudinal outcome. To be specific, Chapter 2 targets the additive hazards models with sparse longitudinal covariates, Chapter 3 studies the partially linear models with longitudinal covariates and response observed at mismatched time points, also known as asynchronous longitudinal data, and Chapter 4 explores longitudinal data with more complex structures with linear models. Kernel weighting technique is the key idea to all the stated researches. Estimators are derived based on kernel weighting technique and their asymptotical properties were rigorously examined, along with simulation studies for their fi nite sample performance, and illustrations using real data sets.


Biometrika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong Yeob Choi ◽  
Jason P Fine ◽  
M Alan Brookhart

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Welch ◽  
I. Petersen ◽  
K. Walters ◽  
R. W. Morris ◽  
I. Nazareth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document