Analysis of effects of driver’s evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator

Author(s):  
Dhwani Shah ◽  
Chris Lee
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Wen ◽  
Sonmin Yun ◽  
Atsushi Yamashita ◽  
Brandon D. Northcutt ◽  
Hajime Asama

Driving assistance technology has gained traction in recent years and is becoming more widely used in vehicles. However, drivers usually experience a reduced sense of agency when driving assistance is active even though automated assistance improves driving performance by reducing human error and ensuring quick reactions. The present study examined whether driving assistance can maintain human sense of agency during early deceleration in the face of collision risk, compared with manual deceleration. In the experimental task, participants decelerate their vehicle in a driving simulator to avoid collision with a vehicle that suddenly cut in front of them and decelerated. In the assisted condition, the system performed deceleration 100 ms after the cut-in. Participants were instructed to decelerate their vehicle and follow the vehicle that cut-in. This design ensured that the deceleration assistance applied a similar control to the vehicle as the drivers intended to, only faster and smoother. Participants rated their sense of agency and their driving performance. The results showed that drivers maintained their sense of agency and improved driving performance under driving assistance. The findings provided insights into designing driving assistance that can maintain drivers’ sense of agency while improving future driving performance. It is important to establish a mode of joint-control in which the system shares the intention of human drivers and provides improved execution of control.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110051
Author(s):  
Shreyas S Chitnis ◽  
Andrew G Marsh ◽  
James A Gillespie ◽  
Aamer Nisar ◽  
Dominic RM Meek ◽  
...  

Introduction: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is increasingly being used to treat young adults with symptomatic hip dysplasia. Currently there is a lack of evidence to guide return to driving after this procedure. This study aimed to identify the length of time required after a Periacetabular Osteotomy procedure before a patient can safely return to driving. Methods: All patients undergoing PAO were assessed for suitability for the study. Inclusion criteria were: currently driving with a valid licence; and being able to attend follow-up assessment. Baseline driving reaction time was assessed using a driving simulator preoperatively. The simulation was repeated 5 times for each patient and reaction times recorded (Thinking time, Action time and Total reaction time for braking at 30 mph). The driving simulation was repeated using the same methods at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative times were compared. Results: 26 patients were included (24 females, 2 males) with a mean age of 32 (range 19–50) years. The mean preoperative times were: Thinking time 0.48, Action time 0.21, Total time 0.69 seconds. At 6 weeks postoperatively, mean Action time increased to 0.26 seconds ( p = 0.012) and mean Total time increased to 0.78 seconds ( p = 0.013). By 12 weeks post procedure, there was no significant difference in reaction times compared to baseline (mean Thinking time 0.47 seconds, Action time 0.23, Total time 0.72; p > 0.05). Conclusions: Most patients may not be safe to drive at 6 weeks following PAO procedures but should be safe to drive at 12 weeks postoperatively. Individual patient factors should also be taken into consideration.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eve A. Isham ◽  
Joy J. Geng ◽  
Elizabeth A. Disbrow
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guihua Yang ◽  
Farnaz Baniahmad ◽  
Beverly K. Jaeger ◽  
Ronald R. Mourant
Keyword(s):  

CICTP 2019 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanfang Zhang ◽  
Kun Zhao ◽  
Xuekun Wang ◽  
Shuo Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document