Initial Experience with Upfront Arterial and Perfusion Imaging among Ischemic Stroke Patients Presenting within the 4.5-hour Time Window

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Reza Noorian ◽  
Katja Bryant ◽  
Ashley Aiken ◽  
Andrew D. Nicholson ◽  
Adam B. Edwards ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jesus Duffis ◽  
Zaid Al-Qudah ◽  
Charles J. Prestigiacomo ◽  
Chirag Gandhi

Early treatment of ischemic stroke with thrombolytics is associated with improved outcomes, but few stroke patients receive thrombolytic treatment in part due to the 3-hour time window. Advances in neuroimaging may help to aid in the selection of patients who may still benefit from thrombolytic treatment beyond conventional time-based guidelines. In this article the authors review the available literature in support of using advanced neuroimaging to select patients for treatment beyond the 3-hour time window cutoff and explore potential applications and limitations of perfusion imaging in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Steve O’Donnell ◽  
Alex Linn ◽  
Scott McNally ◽  
Bailey Dunleavy ◽  
...  

Introduction: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in an extended time window for acute ischemic stroke patients with Target Mismatch (TM) on perfusion imaging was shown in a recent study and the ongoing DEFUSE-3 trial is studying thrombectomy in a 6-16 hour window for TM patients. A limitation of TM is that perfusion imaging is not widely available. We sought to identify a tool to predict TM based on clinical factors and CT angiogram (CTA) imaging, which is available at most hospitals. Methods: We reviewed acute ischemic stroke patients from 2010-2014 with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion, CTA and CT perfusion (CTP) at hospital admission. TM was identified on CTP using the Olea Sphere volumetric analysis software with Bayesian deconvolution. TM was defined by the DEFUSE-3 criteria. ASPECTS was derived from the non-contrast CT head and the CTA source images (CTA-ASPECTS). Two collateral scores were derived from CTA source images. Results: 61 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean±SD age was 61±18 years and 61% were male. Mean NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 14.1±8.0 and median (IQR) follow-up modified Rankin Scale was 3 (1,6). TM was present in 35/61 (57%), who had lower mRS at follow-up (z=3.5, p<0.001). The predictor variables are shown in Table 1. The best combination of predictors was CTA-ASPECTS >4 and NIHSS <16, which had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85% for TM (Figure 1). Discussion: We report a reliable, accessible, and clinically useful tool for predicting TM. This score warrants further study as a tool to guide transfer decisions from primary or secondary stroke centers to tertiary centers where endovascular intervention would be possible for selected patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017315
Author(s):  
J Mocco ◽  
Adnan H Siddiqui ◽  
David Fiorella ◽  
Michael J Alexander ◽  
Adam S Arthur ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe PerfusiOn imaging Selection of Ischemic sTroke patIents for endoVascular thErapy (POSITIVE) trial was designed to evaluate functional outcome in patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) presenting within 0–12 hours with pre-specified bifurcated arms of early and late window presentation, who were selected for endovascular thrombectomy with non-vendor specific commercially available perfusion imaging software. Recent trials demonstrating the benefit of thrombectomy up to 16–24 hours following ELVO removed equipoise to randomize late window ELVO patients and therefore the trial was halted.MethodsUp to 200 patients were to be enrolled in this FDA-cleared, prospective, randomized, multicenter international trial to compare thrombectomy and best medical management in patients with ELVO ineligible for or refractory to treatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) selected with perfusion imaging and presenting within 0–12 hours of last seen normal. The primary outcome was 90-day clinical outcome as measured by the raw modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with scores 5 and 6 collapsed (mRS shift analysis).ResultsThe POSITIVE trial suspended enrollment with the release of results from the DAWN trial and was stopped after the release of the DEFUSE 3 trial results. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (21 for medical management and 12 for thrombectomy). Twelve of the 33 patients were enrolled in the 6–12 hour cohort. Despite the early cessation, the primary outcome demonstrated statistically significant superior clinical outcomes for patients treated with thrombectomy (P=0.0060). The overall proportion of patients achieving an mRS score of 0–2 was 75% in the thrombectomy cohort and 43% in the medical management cohort (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 19.2).ConclusionPOSITIVE supports the already established practice of delayed thrombectomy for appropriately selected patients presenting within 0–12 hours selected by perfusion imaging from any vendor. The results of the POSITIVE trial are consistent with other thrombectomy trials. The statistically significant effect on functional improvement, despite the small number of patients, reinforces the robust benefits of thrombectomy.Clinical trial registrationNCT01852201


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janhavi M Modak ◽  
Syed Daniyal Asad ◽  
Jussie Lima ◽  
Amre Nouh ◽  
Ilene Staff ◽  
...  

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke treatment has undergone a paradigm shift, with patients being treated in the extended time window (6-24 hours post symptom onset). The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes in stroke patients above 80 years of age undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the extended time window. Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting to Hartford Hospital between January 2017 to June 2019 were considered for the study. Stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age with anterior circulation ischemic strokes presenting in the extended time window (Group A, n=30) were compared to a younger cohort of patients below 80 years (Group B, n=31). Patients over 80 years treated in the traditional time window (within 6 hours of symptom onset) served as a second set of controls (Group C, n=40). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of 0.05 Results: For angiographic results, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of good outcomes (TICI 2b-3) among patients of Group A, when compared to Groups B or C (p>0.05). For the endovascular procedures, no significant differences were noted in the total fluoroscopy time (Median Group A 44.05, Group B 38.1, Group C 35.25 min), total intra-procedure time (Median Group A 144, Group B 143, Group C 126 min) or total radiation exposure (Median Group A 8308, Group B 8960, Group C 8318 uGy-m 2 ). For stroke outcomes, a good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin score of 0-2 at discharge. Significantly better outcomes were noted in the younger patients in Group B - 35.4%, when compared to 13.3% in Group A (p=0.03). Comparative outcomes differed in the elderly patients above 80 years, Group A -13.3% vs Group C - 25%, although not statistically significant (p=0.23). There was a significant difference in mortality in patients of Group A - 40% as compared to 12% in the younger cohort, Group B (p= 0.01). Conclusions: In the extended time window, patients above 80 years of age were noted to have a higher mortality, morbidity compared to the younger cohort of patients. No significant differences were noted in the stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age when comparing the traditional and the extended time window for stroke treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Srikant Rangaraju ◽  
Adam Edwards ◽  
Seena Dehkharghani ◽  
Fadi Nahab

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Archit Bhatt ◽  
Lindsay Lucas ◽  
Elizabeth Baraban

Background/Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions are traditionally treated with thrombectomy within a 6-hour time window. Often patients get groin punctures for thrombectomy beyond 6 hours. The purpose of our study is to report real world data comparing short-term outcome differences in patients who receive groin punctures within 6 hours versus beyond 6 hours in a multi-hub telestroke network. Method: Data obtained from the Providence Health and Services Get With the Guidelines stroke registry were used to identify AIS patients who received intra-arterial (IA) intervention and were discharged from the hospital between November 2014 and May 2016. Patients were categorized as having Last Known Well-to-Groin-Puncture times (LKW-to-GP) over six hours or LKW-to-GP below or equal to six hours. Outcomes were modified rankin score (mRS) at discharge (slight or no disability versus moderate disability to dead), discharge disposition (home versus not home), change in NIHSS from admittance to discharge, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariate analyses were used to determine impact of the LKW-to-GP group on outcomes adjusting for post thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade, pre-symptom onset mRS, and admission NIHSS score. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were compared between the two groups using Fisher’s exact test. Results: We identified 136 ischemic stroke patients, 46.3% female with a mean age of 70.7 years (±14.6), who received IA intervention and were discharged between November 2014 and May 2016. Of those, 21% (n=29) had LKW-to-GP below or equal to six hours and 79% (n=107) had LKW-to-GP above six hours. After adjusting for covariates, there were no statistically significant differences in discharge mRS (p=.284), discharge disposition (p=.736), length of stay (p=.473) and change in NIHSS (p=.135). Unadjusted intracranial hemorrhage rates (p=.101) between the two LKW-to-GP groups were also not significant. Conclusions: We discovered one in five patients were treated beyond the traditional time window in a multi-hub telestroke network. We found no statistically significant difference in short term outcomes in patients receiving thrombectomy beyond 6 hours compared to those receiving thrombectomy within 6 hours.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Provencher ◽  
Ashley Scherman ◽  
Elizabeth Baraban ◽  
Robert Jackson ◽  
Tamela L Stuchiner ◽  
...  

Previous studies have shown that faster Door to Needle (DTN) treatment times are associated with better outcomes for acute ischemic stroke patients. With the continued push for faster times, we aimed to determine if DTN treatment times in the 30- vs 45-minute time window yielded statistically significant differences in outcomes or complications. Data obtained from a multi-state stroke registry included acute ischemic stroke patients ≥18 years of age discharged between January 2017 and April 2020, and treated with IV alteplase with DTN times between 25-30 or 40-45 minutes. Outcomes were 90-day Modified Rankin Score (mRS) (0-2 vs 3-6), discharge disposition [home or inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) vs other location], complications (any treatment-related complication vs none), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients with a documented reason for delay or who received thrombectomy were excluded. Outcomes of patients with 25- to 30-minute DTN times were compared to those with 40- to 45-minute DTN times using generalized linear models and multiple linear regression, adjusting for admission NIHSS, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical history. Compared to the 20-25 minute group, patients treated in the 40-45 minute window had higher odds of a documented 90-day mRS of 3 or more (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)=1.19, p=0.253, n=201 ) and treatment-related complication (AOR=1.35, p=0.569) and lower odds of discharge to home or IRF (AOR=0.846, p=0.359). There was little difference in LOS (β=-0.008, p=0.847). None of the outcomes reached statistical significance. Administering alteplase in the 25- to 30-minute window is safe and did not result in an increase in bleeding complications. Although faster treatment times trended toward better outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the 25-30 and 40-45 minute DTN treatment times.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nastajjia Krementz ◽  
Kefeng Wang ◽  
Carolina M Gutierrez ◽  
Antonio Bustillo ◽  
Nils H Mueller ◽  
...  

Background: Access to endovascular therapy (EVT) should be equitable to all eligible ischemic stroke patients presenting within the treatment time window. In the Florida Stroke Registry (FSR) we sought to determine sex, race/ethnic, hospital and regional disparities in the delivery of EVT. Methods: From January 2010 to January 2020, a total of 99,088 ischemic stroke cases within 24 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations evaluated independent predictors of EVT utilization. Results: A total of 7,812 patients received EVT (51.2% female, mean age 71.3 ± SD 14.6 years, 61.4% white, 17.4% black, 21.2% Hispanic). Compared to those not treated, EVT treated patients were more likely Hispanic (21.2% vs. 14.6%), arrived earlier to the hospital (median 120 min (IQR 292) vs. 170 min (IQR 446)), via EMS (94% vs. 66%), with more severe strokes (median NIHSS 15 (IQR11) vs. 5 (IQR 9)), to large hospitals (≥ 680 beds) (73.4% vs. 47.7%), in South Florida (50.8% vs. 38.2%). In multivariable analysis, female sex (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1-1.11), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.45-1.7), higher NIHSS (> 6) (OR 6.19, 95% CI 5.11-7.51) and presenting to a high-volume hospital (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.25-5.36) positively predicted EVT utilization, whereas older age (>80 years) (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96), and black race (vs. white OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1), were independently associated with lower use of EVT. Conclusions: In this large state-wide registry study, we found significant race-ethic and geographical disparities in delivery of EVT. Systems of care should address disparities in stroke treatment to improve access to EVT for all eligible stroke patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document