scholarly journals Robot-assisted Gait Training Using Welwalk in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: An Effectiveness Study with Matched Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 105377
Author(s):  
Takuma Ii ◽  
Satoshi Hirano ◽  
Shigeo Tanabe ◽  
Eiichi Saitoh ◽  
Junya Yamada ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Andy Chien ◽  
Fei-Chun Chang ◽  
Nai-Hsin Meng ◽  
Pei-Yu Yang ◽  
Ching Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Robot-assisted gait rehabilitation has been proposed as a plausible supplementary rehabilitation strategy in stroke rehabilitation in the last decade. However, its exact benefit over traditional rehabilitation remain sparse and unclear. It is therefore the purpose of the current study to comparatively investigate the clinical benefits of the additional robot-assisted training in acute stroke patients compared to standard hospital rehabilitation alone. Methods Ninety acute stroke patients (< 3 month) were recruited. All participants received the standard hospital neurorehabilitation comprises 45–60 min sessions daily for 3 weeks. Sixty patients also received an additional 30 min of robot-assisted gait training with the HIWIN MRG-P100 gait training system after each of the standard neurorehabilitation session. Outcome measures included: 1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS); 2. Brunnstrom Stage; 3. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and 4. Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) which were assessed pre-treatment and then after every five training sessions. Results Both groups demonstrated significant improvement pre- and post-treatment for the BBS (robotic group p = 0.023; control group p = 0.033) but no significant difference (p > 0.1) between the groups were found. However, the robotic training group had more participants demonstrating larger BBS points of improvement as well as greater Brunnstrom stage of improvement, when compared to the control group. No significant within and between group statistical differences (p > 0.3) were found for Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire. Conclusion The addition of robotic gait training on top of standard hospital neurorehabilitation for acute stroke patients appear to produce a slightly greater improvement in clinical functional outcomes, which is not transferred to psychological status.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kyeong Joo Song ◽  
Min Ho Chun ◽  
Junekyung Lee ◽  
Changmin Lee

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of the robot–assisted gait training on cortical activation and functional outcomes in stroke patients. METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned: training with Morning Walk® (Morning Walk group; n = 30); conventional physiotherapy (control group; n = 30). Rehabilitation was performed five times a week for 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the cortical activation in the Morning Walk group. The secondary outcomes included gait speed, 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), FAC, Motricity Index–Lower (MI–Lower), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were analyzed, 18 in the Morning Walk group and 18 in the control group. The cortical activation was lower in affected hemisphere than unaffected hemisphere at the beginning of robot rehabilitation. After training, the affected hemisphere achieved a higher increase in cortical activation than the unaffected hemisphere. Consequently, the cortical activation in affected hemisphere was significantly higher than that in unaffected hemisphere (P = 0.036). FAC, MBI, BBS, and RMI scores significantly improved in both groups. The Morning Walk group had significantly greater improvements than the control group in 10MWT (P = 0.017), gait speed (P = 0.043), BBS (P = 0.010), and MI–Lower (P = 0.047) scores. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted gait training not only improved functional outcomes but also increased cortical activation in stroke patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Goffredo ◽  
Francesco Infarinato ◽  
Sanaz Pournajaf ◽  
Paola Romano ◽  
Marco Ottaviani ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Hyuk Chang ◽  
Min Su Kim ◽  
Jung Phil Huh ◽  
Peter K. W. Lee ◽  
Yun-Hee Kim

1988 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
RYUICHI NAKAMURA ◽  
TORU HOSOKAWA ◽  
YOSHIAKI YAMADA ◽  
JOSE ALVIN P. MOJICA

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Taveggia ◽  
Alberto Borboni ◽  
Chiara Mulé ◽  
Jorge H. Villafañe ◽  
Stefano Negrini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document