Effects of dehydration on thermoregulatory behavior and thermal tolerance limits of Rana catesbeiana ( )

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 102721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estefany Caroline Guevara-Molina ◽  
Fernando Ribeiro Gomes ◽  
Agustín Camacho
2019 ◽  
Vol 374 (1778) ◽  
pp. 20190036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Sunday ◽  
Joanne M. Bennett ◽  
Piero Calosi ◽  
Susana Clusella-Trullas ◽  
Sarah Gravel ◽  
...  

Linking variation in species' traits to large-scale environmental gradients can lend insight into the evolutionary processes that have shaped functional diversity and future responses to environmental change. Here, we ask how heat and cold tolerance vary as a function of latitude, elevation and climate extremes, using an extensive global dataset of ectotherm and endotherm thermal tolerance limits, while accounting for methodological variation in acclimation temperature, ramping rate and duration of exposure among studies. We show that previously reported relationships between thermal limits and latitude in ectotherms are robust to variation in methods. Heat tolerance of terrestrial ectotherms declined marginally towards higher latitudes and did not vary with elevation, whereas heat tolerance of freshwater and marine ectotherms declined more steeply with latitude. By contrast, cold tolerance limits declined steeply with latitude in marine, intertidal, freshwater and terrestrial ectotherms, and towards higher elevations on land. In all realms, both upper and lower thermal tolerance limits increased with extreme daily temperature, suggesting that different experienced climate extremes across realms explain the patterns, as predicted under the Climate Extremes Hypothesis . Statistically accounting for methodological variation in acclimation temperature, ramping rate and exposure duration improved model fits, and increased slopes with extreme ambient temperature. Our results suggest that fundamentally different patterns of thermal limits found among the earth's realms may be largely explained by differences in episodic thermal extremes among realms, updating global macrophysiological ‘rules’. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Physiological diversity, biodiversity patterns and global climate change: testing key hypotheses involving temperature and oxygen’.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Bouwmeester ◽  
Haneen I. Eldos ◽  
Christopher S. Warren ◽  
Pedro Range ◽  
John Burt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Bjerregaard Jørgensen ◽  
Hans Malte ◽  
Michael Ørsted ◽  
Nikolaj Andreasen Klahn ◽  
Johannes Overgaard

Abstract Temperature tolerance is critical for defining the fundamental niche of ectotherms and researchers classically use either static (exposure to a constant temperature) or dynamic (ramping temperature) assays to assess tolerance. The use of different methods complicates comparison between studies and here we present mathematical model (and R-scripts) to reconcile thermal tolerance measures obtained from static and dynamic assays. Our model uses input data from several static or dynamic experiments and is based on the well-supported assumption that thermal injury accumulation rate increases exponentially with temperature (recently re-introduced as Thermal Tolerance Landscapes). The model also assumes thermal stress at different temperatures to be additive and using experiments with Drosophila melanogaster, we validate these central assumptions by demonstrating that heat injury attained at different heat stress intensities and durations is additive. In a separate experiment we demonstrate that our model can accurately describe injury accumulation during fluctuating temperature stress and further we validate the model by successfully converting literature data of ectotherm heat tolerance (both static and dynamic assays) to a single, comparable metric (the temperature tolerated for 1 hour). The model presented here has many promising applications for the analysis of ectotherm thermal tolerance and we also discuss potential pitfalls that should be considered and avoided using this model.


Coral Reefs ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Fitt ◽  
Barbara Brown ◽  
Mark Warner ◽  
Richard Dunne

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e0150408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna F. V. Pintor ◽  
Lin Schwarzkopf ◽  
Andrew K. Krockenberger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document