MA05.05 Treatment Patterns in Patients With EGFR-Positive Lung Cancer: A Real-World Patient-Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S900
Author(s):  
I. Elkins ◽  
J. Feldman ◽  
A. Figueras ◽  
T. Kennedy ◽  
B. King-Kallimanis ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-331
Author(s):  
Sarah Sharman Moser ◽  
Jair Bar ◽  
Inna Kan ◽  
Keren Ofek ◽  
Raanan Cohen ◽  
...  

In this observational study, we assessed treatment patterns and prognostic factors in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a large state-mandated healthcare organization in Israel. Methods: All incident cases with histologically confirmed SCLC who initiated systemic anti-cancer treatment between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for each line of therapy. Results: A total of 235 patients were identified (61% male, median age 64 years, 95% ever smokers, 64% had extensive stage). The first-line treatment was platinum–etoposide regimen for 98.7% of the cohort. The second and third-line regimen were given to 43% and 12% of patients, respectively. Mean OS for extensive and limited stage patients was 9.1 and 23.5 months respectively. In a multivariable model, increased risk for mortality was observed among patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 compared to a PS of 0–1 for the extensive stage patients (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63, 95% confidence ratios (CI): 1.00–2.65); and for males compared to females for the limited stage patients (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.12–4.20). Regarding all 2nd line patients in a multivariable model incorporating relevant confounding factors, demonstrated a significantly better outcome with platinum–based regimens compared to topotecan. Median survival after initiation of 2nd line in platinum-sensitive patients was longer (p = 0.056) for those re-challenged with platinum–based regimen (n = 7): 6.8mo (6.1-not reported (NR)), compared with those switched to a different treatment (n = 27): 4.5 mo (2.6–6.6) for extensive stage patients, and a non-significant difference was also observed for limited stage patients. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is one of the largest real-world studies of SCLC patients. OS for SCLC patients was similar to that reported in clinical trials. PS for extensive stage patients and sex for limited stage patients were significant correlates of prognosis. Re-challenge of the platinum–based doublet was associated with longer OS compared to switching treatment in extensive stage patients.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Ravi K. Goyal ◽  
Stephen L. Able ◽  
Jacqueline Brown ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S942-S943
Author(s):  
A.R. Jazieh ◽  
E. Kaytan Saglam ◽  
H.C. Önal ◽  
Y. Abdelkader ◽  
R. Gaafar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9096-9096
Author(s):  
Leora Horn ◽  
Joshua Bauml ◽  
Patrick M. Forde ◽  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Nathaniel James Myall ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2566-2566
Author(s):  
Wendy S. Rubinstein ◽  
Li Chen ◽  
George Anthony Komatsoulis ◽  
Edward Stepanski ◽  
Monika Jun ◽  
...  

2566 Background: ICI’s have demonstrated significant clinical benefit since the first FDA approval in 2011 of ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. Five additional ICI therapies have since been approved across several indications. The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical and demographic features of patients receiving ICI treatment along with utilization patterns in real-world settings. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study using statistically de-identified data from January 2011 to November 2018 in CancerLinQ, ASCO’s real-world oncology database, which now contains EHR data from 49 diverse oncology practices in the U.S. Adult patients diagnosed with any cancer type who received ≥1 dose of an ICI (see Table) and had ≥2 clinical visits were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received an ICI prior to its first FDA approval date to avoid inclusion of clinical trial patients. Descriptive statistics were used to examine treatment patterns and clinical characteristics of patients receiving ICIs. Results: This analysis included 12,712 patients who received an ICI. Median patient age was 67.4 years [IQR 59.3, 75.3]; 58% were male. White race made up the highest percent (83%) of ICI patients, followed by Black race (9%) and Other (8%). The most common primary cancers at the start of treatment were lung cancer (36%), melanoma (8%), urothelial cancer (2%) and renal cell carcinoma (2%). Of the 8,444 patients with known disease stage, 5,446 (64%) had Stage IV cancer. Breakdown of ICI treatment patterns can be found in the accompanying table. Uptake of ICIs was the most rapid for nivolumab, which had the highest use (49%), followed by pembrolizumab for rapid adoption and use (30%). Conclusions: This analysis gives insights into patient characteristics and real-world treatment patterns for ICIs. ICIs were used most widely in males, lung cancer patients and patients with advanced disease. These baseline characteristics inform our analyses of ICI use in patients with autoimmune disease, also reported herein.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document