Sensory Evoked Potentials of the Human Lower Urinary Tract

2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 2179-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Gregorini ◽  
Jens Wöllner ◽  
Martin Schubert ◽  
Armin Curt ◽  
Thomas M. Kessler ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 693-709
Author(s):  
Stéphanie van der Lely ◽  
Thomas M. Kessler ◽  
Ulrich Mehnert ◽  
Martina D. Liechti

Abstract Impaired lower urinary tract (LUT) afferents often cause LUT symptoms. Assessment of LUT afferent pathways is possible using bipolar cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings with the active electrode at the vertex during electrical stimulation in the LUT. This study aimed to investigate the topographical distribution and microstates of lower urinary tract sensory evoked potentials (LUTSEPs) using different stimulation frequencies. Ninety healthy subjects (18–36 years old, 40 women) were randomly assigned to one of five stimulation locations [bladder dome; trigone; proximal, membranous (men only) or distal urethra]. Cycles of 0.5 Hz/1.1 Hz/1.6 Hz electrical stimulation were applied using a custom-made catheter. Cortical activity was recorded from 64 surface electrodes. Marker setting was performed manually on an individual subject-level for the P1, N1, and P2 components of vertex recordings. N1 and P2 topographies presented with central negativities and positivities around the vertex. Regarding topographical distribution, Randomization Graphical User interface (RAGU) analyses revealed consistent frequency effects and microstates for N1/P2. Higher stimulation frequencies resulted in decreasing map strength for P1, N1, and P2. LUTSEP topographies suggest central generators in the somatosensory cortex, which are not detectable in a bipolar set-up. The observed frequency effect indicates fiber refractoriness at higher frequencies. The multichannel approach allows more comprehensive assessment of LUTSEPs and might therefore be sensitive to pathological changes. Examinations in patients with LUT symptoms are needed to further investigate this biomarker.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 2614-2624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie C. Knüpfer ◽  
Martina D. Liechti ◽  
Stéphanie van der Lely ◽  
Flavia Gregorini ◽  
Martin Schubert ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina D. Liechti ◽  
Stephanie Knuepfer ◽  
Flavia Gregorini ◽  
Martin Schubert ◽  
Armin Curt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-239
Author(s):  
Prasad Malladi ◽  
Sara Simeoni ◽  
Jalesh N. Panicker

Abstract Purpose of Review The role of pelvic neurophysiology testing in the evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract (LUT) symptoms is explored in this review. Recent Findings Different neurophysiology tests such as sphincter EMG and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials are useful in evaluating the sacral somatic afferent and efferent innervation. S2 and S3 dermatomal evoked potentials assess individual sacral roots and are feasible to perform using standard neurophysiology machines. Summary The innervation of the LUT has a substantial contribution from splanchnic and somatic nerves arising from the sacral segments. Pelvic neurophysiology tests, which assess somatic nerve functions, are therefore a useful tool in assessing sacral nerve functions in patients presenting with unexplained voiding dysfunction. In this review, the commonly performed neurophysiology studies that assess the S2, S3 and S4 sacral afferent and efferent pathways are outlined, and their clinical applications reviewed.


1984 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaby G. Badr ◽  
Magnus Fall Carl-Axel Carlsson ◽  
Lars Lindstrom Sven Friberg ◽  
Bo Ohlsson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document