Monitoring Cortico-cortical Evoked Potentials using Only Two 6-strand Strip Electrodes for Gliomas Extending to the Dominant Side of Frontal Operculum During One-step Tumor Removal Surgery

Resection of the dominant side of gliomas extending to the frontal operculum has a high-risk of permanent language dysfunction. Here, we report recording cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEP) using only two 6-strand strip electrodes to monitor language-related fibers intraoperatively. We examined whether this simple procedure is useful for removing gliomas extending to the dominant side of frontal operculum. This study included five cases of glioma extending to the left frontal operculum. The frontal language area (FLA) was first identified by functional mapping during awake craniotomy. Next, a 6-strand strip electrode was placed just above the FLA, while on the temporal lobe side, an electrode was placed so as to slide parallel to the Sylvian fissure toward the posterior language area. Electrical stimulation was performed using the electrode on the frontal side, and CCEPs were measured from the electrode on the temporal side. CCEPs were detected in all cases. Immediately after surgery, all patients demonstrated language dysfunction to varying degrees. CCEP decreased up to 10% in one patient, who recovered language function after 24 months. CCEP decreased slightly up to 80% in one, and in the three other cases, CCEPs did not change. These four patients soon recovered language function within 2 weeks to 1 month. This study confirmed the utility of CCEP monitoring using only two 6-strand strip electrodes during one-step surgery. We believe this simple method helped in monitoring intraoperative language function and aided predicting its postoperative recovery, in patients with gliomas extending to the dominant side of frontal operculum.

Spatial-Temporal Functional Mapping Combined With Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials in Predicting Cortical Stimulation Results

Functional human brain mapping is commonly performed during invasive monitoring with intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) electrodes prior to resective surgery for drug­ resistant epilepsy. The current gold standard, electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM), is time ­consuming, sometimes elicits pain, and often induces after discharges or seizures. Moreover, there is a risk of overestimating eloquent areas due to propagation of the effects of stimulation to a broader network of language cortex. Passive iEEG spatial-temporal functional mapping (STFM) has recently emerged as a potential alternative to ESM. However, investigators have observed less correspondence between STFM and ESM maps of language than between their maps of motor function. We hypothesized that incongruities between ESM and STFM of language function may arise due to propagation of the effects of ESM to cortical areas having strong effective connectivity with the site of stimulation. We evaluated five patients who underwent invasive monitoring for seizure localization, whose language areas were identified using ESM. All patients performed a battery of language tasks during passive iEEG recordings. To estimate the effective connectivity of stimulation sites with a broader network of task-activated cortical sites, we measured cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) elicited across all recording sites by single-pulse electrical stimulation at sites where ESM was performed at other times. With the combination of high gamma power as well as CCEPs results, we trained a logistic regression model to predict ESM results at individual electrode pairs. The average accuracy of the classifier using both STFM and CCEPs results combined was 87.7%, significantly higher than the one using STFM alone (71.8%), indicating that the correspondence between STFM and ESM results is greater when effective connectivity between ESM stimulation sites and task-activated sites is taken into consideration. These findings, though based on a small number of subjects to date, provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that incongruities between ESM and STFM may arise in part from propagation of stimulation effects to a broader network of cortical language sites activated by language tasks, and suggest that more studies, with larger numbers of patients, are needed to understand the utility of both mapping techniques in clinical practice.