scholarly journals PMD71 Resource Use Caused by in-office Follow-up Visits for Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices (CIED) in Germany and the United Kingdom

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A257
Author(s):  
A. Smala ◽  
M. Gessler ◽  
T. Vogtmann
ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sunil Dutt Sharma ◽  
Ahmad Hariri ◽  
Ravi Kumar Lingam ◽  
Arvind Singh

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI (DWMRI) has a role in the surgical planning for cholesteatoma. <b><i>Aims/Objectives:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess the use of DWMRI in the management of cholesteatoma across the UK, and measure clinicians’ confidence in the use of DWMRI. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Telephone survey in 139 Otolaryngology Departments in the United Kingdom between March 2017 and July 2017, and asking radiology delegates at the British Society of Head and Neck Imaging 2017 meeting. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate was 101 out of 139 Trusts (73%). Of those respondents who did have DWMRI available, 68/88 respondents (77%) use it for cholesteatoma. The mean confidence (±standard deviation) of the respondents with DWMRI in identifying cholesteatoma presence was 7.3 ± 2.1, in identifying volume of cholesteatoma was 6.8 ± 1.8, and in identifying subsites of cholesteatoma was 4.6 ± 2.1. <b><i>Conclusions and Significance:</i></b> DWMRI has a well-defined role in the follow-up of patients after cholesteatoma surgery, and those primary cases of cholesteatoma where the diagnosis is in question. The use of DWMRI for cholesteatoma is variable across the UK, but there are certain clinical scenarios where there is not enough awareness regarding the benefits of imaging (such as petrous apex cases of cholesteatoma).


2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamez Ladhani ◽  
Paul T. Heath ◽  
Mary E. Ramsay ◽  
Mary P. E. Slack ◽  
Elizabeth Kibwana ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
D. W. Hughes ◽  
W. J. Chrispin

In 1987, a paper entitled ‘The United Kingdom Engine Technology Demonstrator Programme’ (ASME 87-GT-203) was presented at the Gas Turbine Conference in Anaheim. That paper postulated that a programme of engine technology demonstration ahead of commitment to full-scale development was essential if past problems of cost overrun and inadequate performance at service entry were to be avoided. The paper concluded that the UK had established a balanced programme of technology demonstration, emphasising that Industry and Government must invest this activity with the same commitment traditionally given to projects if the full benefits were to be realised. This follow-up paper presents an expanded view of future programme objectives and how the programme elements formulated for their achievement are to be managed.


Burns ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-219
Author(s):  
Paula Johnstone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document