Abstract No. 341: Targeted MRI Guided Biopsy after Transplantation with MR Visible Magnetocapsules (MCs) Containing Human Islets

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
D.A. Woodrum ◽  
T. Link ◽  
W.D. Gilson ◽  
R. Liddell ◽  
B.P. Barnett ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Kaufmann ◽  
Stephan Kruck ◽  
Ulrich Kramer ◽  
Sergios Gatidis ◽  
Arnulf Stenzl ◽  
...  

Objective: To directly compare the diagnostic performance of targeted MRI-guided biopsy (MR-GB) and systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB). Methods: Thirty-five patients with at least one negative TRUS-GB, persistently elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen and a lesion suspicious for prostate cancer (PC) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) scored by using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) were included. A median of three targeted biopsies per lesion were obtained and systematic TRUS-GB was performed subsequently by an independent urologist without knowledge of the MRI findings. Definite pathology reports were analyzed for anatomical location and criteria of clinical significance. Results: The tumor detection rate was significantly higher with MR-GB compared with TRUS-GB (16/35, 46% and 8/35, 23%, respectively, p < 0.05). MR-GB detected PC in all patients with positive TRUS-GB. All tumors detected by MR-GB exhibited at least one criterion of clinical significance. PC lesions showed a significantly higher PI-RADS sum score compared with benign lesions. Conclusions: MR-GB is more effective compared with TRUS-GB in detecting clinically significant PC in men after previous negative TRUS-GB. PI-RADS scores give additional information and could be part of the decision-making process when considering retrial biopsy. Additional systematic biopsy can be omitted in patients undergoing targeted MR-GB.


Urology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 158-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve R. Zhou ◽  
Demetrios N. Simopoulos ◽  
Rajiv Jayadevan ◽  
Ely R. Felker ◽  
Merdie K. Delfin ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Vikal ◽  
Steven Haker ◽  
Clare Tempany ◽  
Gabor Fichtinger
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romuald Ferré ◽  
Shaza AlSharif ◽  
Ann Aldis ◽  
Benoît Mesurolle

Purpose The study sought to investigate the outcome of breast magnetic resonance–guided biopsies as a function of the indication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the MRI features of the lesions, and the performance or not of a targeted second-look ultrasound (SLUS) prior breast MRI-guided biopsy. Methods We identified 158 women with MRI-detected breast lesions scheduled for MRI-guided biopsy (2007-2013). Patient demographics, performance of targeted SLUS, imaging characteristics, and subsequent pathology results were reviewed. Results Three biopsies were deferred, and 155 lesions were biopsied under MRI guidance (155 women; median age 55.14 years; range 27-80 years). Ninety-eight women underwent a SLUS prior to the MRI-guided biopsy (63%). Of the 155 biopsied lesions, 23 (15%) were malignant, 106 (68%) were benign, and 26 (17%) were high risk. Four of 15 surgically excised high-risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy (27%). Most of the biopsied lesions corresponded to non–mass-like enhancement (81%, 126 of 155) and most of the biopsies (52%, 81 of 155) were performed in a screening context. No demographic or MRI features were associated with malignancy. No differences were noted between the 2 subgroups (prior SLUS vs no prior SLUS) except for the presence of a synchronous carcinoma associated with a likelihood of targeted SLUS before MRI-guided biopsy ( P = .001). Conclusion A negative SLUS does not influence the pathology outcome of a suspicious lesion biopsied under MR guidance.


Author(s):  
Adam Kinnaird ◽  
Nitin K. Yerram ◽  
Luke O’Connor ◽  
Wayne Brisbane ◽  
Vidit Sharma ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 881-890
Author(s):  
Yoav Amitai ◽  
Tehillah S. Menes ◽  
Anabel Scaranelo ◽  
Rachel Fleming ◽  
Supriya Kulkarni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document