Targeted radiofrequency ablation of spinal metastases that have received prior radiation therapy and in radiation resistant tumors: pain palliation, local tumor control, and patient outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. S19-S20
Author(s):  
T. Greenwood ◽  
T. Hillen ◽  
M.V. Friedman ◽  
J. Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Pain Palliation ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Radiation Resistant

scholarly journals Thermal Ablation of Bone Metastases

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kurup ◽  
Matthew Callstrom ◽  
Michael Moynagh
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Pain Palliation ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Skeletal Related Events ◽  
Percutaneous Thermal Ablation

AbstractImage-guided, minimally invasive, percutaneous thermal ablation of bone metastases has unique advantages compared with surgery or radiation therapy. Thermal ablation of osseous metastases may result in significant pain palliation, prevention of skeletal-related events, and durable local tumor control. This article will describe current thermal ablation techniques utilized to treat bone metastases, summarize contemporary evidence supporting such thermal ablation treatments, and outline an approach to percutaneous ablative treatment.

scholarly journals The Role of a Navigational Radiofrequency Ablation Device and Concurrent Vertebral Augmentation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Reach Spinal Metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 4004-4015
Author(s):  
Claudio Pusceddu ◽  
Davide De Francesco ◽  
Luca Melis ◽  
Nicola Ballicu ◽  
Alessandro Fancellu
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Vertebral Augmentation ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Metastatic Lesions ◽  
The Mean

Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a navigational radiofrequency ablation device with concurrent vertebral augmentation in the treatment of posterior vertebral body metastatic lesions, which are technically difficult to access. Primary outcomes of the study were evaluation of pain palliation and radiologic assessment of local tumor control. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients with 41 vertebral spinal metastases involving the posterior vertebral body underwent computed tomography-guided percutaneous targeted radiofrequency ablation, with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device, associated with vertebral augmentation. Twenty-one patients (60%) had 1 or 2 metastatic lesions (Group A) and fourteen (40%) patients had multiple (>2) vertebral lesions (Group B). Changes in pain severity were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Metastatic lesions were evaluated in terms of radiological local control. Results: The procedure was technically successful in all the treated vertebrae. Among the symptomatic patients, the mean VAS score dropped from 5.7 (95% CI 4.9–6.5) before tRFA and to 0.9 (95% CI 0.4–1.3) after tRFA (p < 0.001). The mean decrease in VAS score between baseline and one week follow up was 4.8 (95% CI 4.2–5.4). VAS decrease over time between one week and one year following radiofrequency ablation was similar, suggesting that pain relief was immediate and durable. Neither patients with 1–2 vertebral metastases, nor those with multiple lesions, showed radiological signs of local progression or recurrence of the tumor in the index vertebrae during a median follow up of 19 months (4–46 months) and 10 months (4–37 months), respectively. Conclusion: Treatment of spinal metastases with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device and vertebral augmentation can be used to obtain local tumor control with immediate and durable pain relief, providing effective treatment in the multimodality management of difficult-to-reach spinal metastases.

Patient outcomes and tumor control in single-fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Christine Park ◽  
Elizabeth P. Howell ◽  
Vikram A. Mehta ◽  
Luis Ramirez ◽  
Meghan J. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Single Fraction ◽  
Median Total Dose

OBJECTIVEStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers efficient, noninvasive treatment of spinal neoplasms. Single-fraction (SF) high-dose SBRT has a relatively narrow therapeutic window, while hypofractionated delivery of SBRT may have an improved safety profile with similar efficacy. Because the optimal approach of delivery is unknown, the authors examined whether hypofractionated SBRT improves pain and/or functional outcomes and results in better tumor control compared with SF-SBRT.METHODSThis is a single-institution retrospective study of adult patients with spinal metastases treated with SF- or three-fraction (3F) SBRT from 2008 to 2019. Demographics and baseline characteristics, radiographic data, and posttreatment outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 3 months are reported.RESULTSOf the 156 patients included in the study, 70 (44.9%) underwent SF-SBRT (median total dose 1700 cGy) and 86 (55.1%) underwent 3F-SBRT (median total dose 2100 cGy). At baseline, a higher proportion of patients in the 3F-SBRT group had a worse baseline profile, including severity of pain (p < 0.05), average use of pain medication (p < 0.001), and functional scores (p < 0.05) compared with the SF-SBRT cohort. At the 3-month follow-up, the 3F-SBRT cohort experienced a greater frequency of improvement in pain compared with the SF-SBRT group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients treated with 3F-SBRT demonstrated a higher frequency of improved Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores (p < 0.05) compared with those treated with SF-SBRT, with no significant difference in the frequency of improvement in modified Rankin Scale scores. Local tumor control did not differ significantly between the two cohorts.CONCLUSIONSPatients who received spinal 3F-SBRT more frequently achieved significant pain relief and an increased frequency of improvement in KPS compared with those treated with SF-SBRT. Local tumor control was similar in the two groups. Future work is needed to establish the relationship between fractionation schedule and clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Drill-assisted, fluoroscopy-guided vertebral body access for radiofrequency ablation: Technical case series

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam N Wallace ◽  
Randy O Chang ◽  
Anderanik Tomasian ◽  
Jack W Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Local Tumor

Radiofrequency ablation is a valuable therapy for palliation of painful spinal metastases and local tumor control; however, accessing the vertebral body can be difficult and time consuming with traditional manual needles. Herein, we report our initial experience using a drill-assisted, fluoroscopy-guided technique for accessing the vertebral body for radiofrequency ablation.

Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Augmentation for Local Tumor Control of Skeletal Metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mermekli ◽  
N. Hare ◽  
R. Fairhead ◽  
D. K.C. Kuek ◽  
A. Gandhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Skeletal Metastases ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document