scholarly journals Abstract No. 511 Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation for the treatment of painful spine metastatic lesions: a non-opiate palliative treatment option

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. S224
Author(s):  
J. Marlow ◽  
J. Jennings
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 4004-4015
Author(s):  
Claudio Pusceddu ◽  
Davide De Francesco ◽  
Luca Melis ◽  
Nicola Ballicu ◽  
Alessandro Fancellu

Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a navigational radiofrequency ablation device with concurrent vertebral augmentation in the treatment of posterior vertebral body metastatic lesions, which are technically difficult to access. Primary outcomes of the study were evaluation of pain palliation and radiologic assessment of local tumor control. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients with 41 vertebral spinal metastases involving the posterior vertebral body underwent computed tomography-guided percutaneous targeted radiofrequency ablation, with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device, associated with vertebral augmentation. Twenty-one patients (60%) had 1 or 2 metastatic lesions (Group A) and fourteen (40%) patients had multiple (>2) vertebral lesions (Group B). Changes in pain severity were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Metastatic lesions were evaluated in terms of radiological local control. Results: The procedure was technically successful in all the treated vertebrae. Among the symptomatic patients, the mean VAS score dropped from 5.7 (95% CI 4.9–6.5) before tRFA and to 0.9 (95% CI 0.4–1.3) after tRFA (p < 0.001). The mean decrease in VAS score between baseline and one week follow up was 4.8 (95% CI 4.2–5.4). VAS decrease over time between one week and one year following radiofrequency ablation was similar, suggesting that pain relief was immediate and durable. Neither patients with 1–2 vertebral metastases, nor those with multiple lesions, showed radiological signs of local progression or recurrence of the tumor in the index vertebrae during a median follow up of 19 months (4–46 months) and 10 months (4–37 months), respectively. Conclusion: Treatment of spinal metastases with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device and vertebral augmentation can be used to obtain local tumor control with immediate and durable pain relief, providing effective treatment in the multimodality management of difficult-to-reach spinal metastases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N. Wallace ◽  
A. Tomasian ◽  
D. Vaswani ◽  
R. Vyhmeister ◽  
R.O. Chang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
Jun-Eul Hwang ◽  
Dae-Eun Kim ◽  
Hyun-Jeong Shim ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Sang-Hee Cho ◽  
...  

136 Background: This study evaluated the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of metachronous liver metastases of gastric cancer. Methods: We enrolled a total of 44 patients who underwent RFA for the treatment of metachronous liver metastases after resection of a primary gastric adenocarcinoma from January 2002 to November 2011. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RFA. Results: Systemic chemotherapy was combined with RFA in 40 patients.The OS and RFS after RFA for all patients were 14.7 (95% CI, 10.1-19.2) and 6.1 months (95%, CI 4.2-8.1). the OS and RFS of the patients with liver-only metastasis who underwent RFA and chemotherapy were 20.9 months (95% CI 18.4-23.4) and 9.8 months (95% CI 9.2-10.5), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the factors independently, negatively associated with RFS were bilobar intrahepatic distribution (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-9.9, p=0.001), and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6-7.8, p=0.003). The factors independently, negatively associated with OS were extrahepatic metastatic lesions (HR 12.6, 95% CI 3.7-42.9, p=0.001), no chemotherapy (HR 43.3, 95% CI 7.4-251.3, p=0.001), and tumor number (≥ 2) (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.9, p=0.015). Conclusions: The efficacy of RFA for metachronous liver metastases of gastric cancer is limited to patients with a single, unilobar metastasis without extrahepatic metastatic lesions. Combined systemic chemotherapy is very important for the prolongation of overall survival.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12086-12086
Author(s):  
Jason Levy ◽  
Elizabeth David ◽  
Thomas Hopkins ◽  
Jonathan Morris ◽  
Nam D. Tran ◽  
...  

12086 Background: Patients with bone metastases may experience pain and decreased quality of life. Standard of care therapies such as radiation therapy could take weeks for pain relief and carry a risk of radiation induced fracture. Minimally invasive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been shown in small observational studies to be an alternative treatment for bone metastases. We report the results of the OPuS One trial evaluating RFA for the palliative treatment of patients with painful bone metastases. Methods: OPuS One (NCT03249584) was a multicenter prospective trial. 218 subjects with painful bone metastases (≥ 4/10 worst pain scores, Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], at target treated site) were enrolled from 15 sites. RFA was performed under image guidance at one or two locations. Vertebral augmentation was followed based on physician’s discretion. Subjects’ pain (BPI) and quality of life (EQ-5D) scores were calculated in subjects at three days, one week, and one, three, six, and 12 months post RFA. Rate of complete (0 pain score at treated site with no concomitant analgesic increase) and partial responders (≥ 2 pain score reduction without analgesic increase or analgesic reduction of ≥ 25% from baseline) were calculated. Device-, procedure-, and/or therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results: 206 subjects, 113 (55%) female and 93 (45%) males (mean age was 63.7 years) were treated with RFA. Most common primary cancers were breast (23%), lung (23%), and kidney (10%). 184 (89%) subjects were treated for metastatic lesions involving the thoracolumbar spine and 22 (11%) subjects were treated for iliac crest, periacetabulum, sacrum or mixed vertebral and pelvic location. 99% (262/264) of RFA procedures were technically successful and 97% were followed by vertebral augmentation. Subjects reported significant improvement in worst pain from baseline at 7.8 to 5.5, 4.7, 3.6, 3.2, 2.4, and 2.6 at three days, one week and one, three, six, and 12 months post RFA, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all visits). Significant improvements were also seen in average pain (p < 0.0001 for all visits), pain interference (p < 0.0001 for all visits), and quality of life scores (p < 0.0001 for all visits). Overall response rates were 53%, 58%, 61%, 63%, 70%, and 75% at three days, one week, one month, three months, six months, and twelve months post RFA, respectively. Six AEs were reported with three as serious: intra-abdominal fluid collection, pneumonia and respiratory failure. 82 deaths were reported during the study, none were related to the device, therapy, and/or procedure. No skeletal related events were reported. Conclusions: In a large prospective multicenter trial, OPuS One, RFA provided rapid, significant, and durable improvements in pain relief and quality of life up to 12 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03249584.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1282-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Luigi Cazzato ◽  
Julien Garnon ◽  
Jean Caudrelier ◽  
Pramod Prabhakar Rao ◽  
Guillaume Koch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document