scholarly journals Abstract No. 157 Computed tomography–guided percutaneous microwave ablation as bridging therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplant: a single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
N. Reid ◽  
A. Som ◽  
R. Cochran ◽  
T. An ◽  
R. Uppot ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4126-4133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoki Ryu ◽  
Yuko Takami ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Takanobu Hara ◽  
Shin Sasaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-205
Author(s):  
Samed Rahatli ◽  
Ebru H. Ayvazoglu Soy ◽  
Arzu Oguz ◽  
Ozden Altundag ◽  
Gokhan Moray ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenpeng Zhao ◽  
Jiang Guo ◽  
Honglu Li ◽  
Liang Cai ◽  
Youjia Duan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We prospectively evaluated the security and efficiency of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) using combined computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US)-guided imaging in patients with BCLC-A1-3 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given that they have shortcomings when used alone.Methods: We included 88 consecutive patients with single HCC who were treated with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE). The patients were divided into 3 groups at random by using draw lots 1 week after TACE. The combination group (34 patients) received MWA under the guidance of CT and US, while the single group (CT group, 30 patients; US group, 24 patients) received MWA under the guidance of CT or US alone. Contrast-enhanced MRI or CT scans were performed in all patients 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The study endpoints included the treatment time, puncture time, local recurrence rate, and adverse events.Results: The median diameter of the lesions was 3.1 (1.5-4.2) cm. The median treatment time was 38.6 (30-45) min and 36.7 (30-47) min in the combination group and US group, respectively. The median puncture number was 1.2 (1-2) times and 1.1 (1-2) times, respectively. Both were significantly less than in the CT group (45.8 min and 4.2 times). The local recurrence rate was 5.9% in the combination group, which was significantly inferior to that in the US group (16.7%). The grade C complication rate in the combination group was 5.9%, while it was 13.3% and 8.3% in the CT group and US group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the combination group and CT group.Conclusions: Using CT- and US-guided microwave ablation in patients with BCLC-A1-3 hepatocellular carcinoma appeared to be much better in terms of security and efficiency than the use of microwave ablation under the guidance of CT or US alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document