scholarly journals Sexual and urinary dysfunction after proctectomy for rectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. e21-e30 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Eveno ◽  
A. Lamblin ◽  
C. Mariette ◽  
M. Pocard
2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Burleson* ◽  
Shelby Powers ◽  
Michael Odom ◽  
Dillon Ellis ◽  
Jae Won Jung ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry H. Chill ◽  
Shani Parnasa ◽  
Noam Shussman ◽  
Roie Alter ◽  
Briggite Helou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer is a condition which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess urinary dysfunction and its effect on quality of life in women who underwent total mesorectal excision compared to women treated by partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. A comparison was performed between women who underwent total mesorectal excision as opposed to partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data were compared between groups. Urinary dysfunction and its impact on quality of life were assessed using UDI-6 and USIQ questionnaires. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in the attempt of assessing risk factors for urinary dysfunction. Results: A total of 107 women were included in the study, 73 women underwent partial mesorectal excision as opposed to 34 women who were treated by total mesorectal excision. Urinary dysfunction following surgery as assessed using the UDI-6 questionnaire did not differ between groups. Similar findings were recorded with regard to the impact of urinary dysfunction on quality of life as assessed using the USIQ questionnaire. Following multivariate analysis longer hospital stay was associated with increased risk of some degree of urinary dysfunction. Conclusions: Women undergoing total mesorectal excision have comparable results to partial mesorectal excision with regard to urinary dysfunction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Karlsson ◽  
D. Bock ◽  
D. Asplund ◽  
B. Ohlsson ◽  
J. Rosenberg ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Yih Chyn Phan ◽  
Joseph Sebastian ◽  
Mohan Harilingam ◽  
George Tsavellas

Introduction: Sexual dysfunction is a recognized complication of rectal cancer surgery, due to the close proximity of the pelvic autonomic nerves to the normal plane of dissection. The consenting process should therefore always include the risk of sexual and urinary dysfunction arising after such surgery. This survey was undertaken to assess the consenting practice, and to evaluate the frequency of use of phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) following rectal cancer surgery. Methods: All listed Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) members were invited to participate in the electronic survey, which comprised six questions. By 8 weeks, 119 responses had been received. Results: There were 112 respondents (94.1%) who routinely discussed the risk of ED during the process of gaining consent for rectal cancer surgery. There were 104 respondents (87.3%) who documented ED on their consent form. There were 24 respondents (20.2%) who indicated that there was no stated percentage risk for ED; and there were 69 (58.0%) and 26 (21.9%) respondents who quoted there was a 0–25% and 26–50% risk of ED during the consent process, respectively. None were quoting > 50% risk of ED. There were 68 respondents (57.1%) who routinely enquired about ED during follow-up. There were 30 respondents (25.2%) who stated that they had experience in prescribing PDE5 inhibitors for their patients who suffer from ED: We had 25 of them who felt that patients benefited from using PDE5 inhibitors. Conclusions: The majority of colorectal surgeons routinely discuss and document the risk of ED when consenting for rectal surgery; however, most surgeons have no experience in prescribing PDE5 inhibitors. This is an area that requires further study and education.


2012 ◽  
Vol 470 (8) ◽  
pp. 2173-2184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekoyejo A. Odutola ◽  
Omar Sabri ◽  
Ruth Halliday ◽  
Timothy J. S. Chesser ◽  
Anthony J. Ward

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Brian Gilmore ◽  
Brian Ezekian ◽  
Zhifei Sun ◽  
Andrew Peterson ◽  
Christopher Mantyh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document