scholarly journals How Often Is Inflow Stenosis a Contributing Factor in the Etiology of Arteriovenous Access-Induced Ischemic Steal?

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 883
Author(s):  
Angela A. Kokkosis ◽  
Steven Abramowitz ◽  
Jonathan Schwitzer ◽  
Scott Nowakowski ◽  
Victoria J. Teodorescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Kaczynski RE ◽  
Asaad Y ◽  
Valentin-Capeles N ◽  
Battista J

We discuss a case of a 58 year old male who presented for left upper extremity steal syndrome including ischemic monomelic neuropathy (IMN) 1.5 months after arteriovenous fistula creation. He presented after three surgical attempts to salvage his fistula with rest pain, complete loss of function with contracture of the 4th and 5th digits, and loss of sensation in the ulnar distribution for more than three weeks. At our institution, he underwent surgical ligation of the distal fistula and creation of a new fistula proximally, resulting in complete resolution of his vascular steal symptoms almost immediately despite the chronicity prior to surgical presentation. Our patient provides a unique perspective regarding dialysis access salvage versus patient quality of life. The patients’ functional status and pain levels should take precedence over salvage of an arteriovenous access site, and early ligation of the access should be completed prior to chronic IMN development. However, if a patient presents late along the IMN course, we recommend strong consideration of access ligation in order to attempt to regain the full neurovascular function of the extremity as we experienced in our patient.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982096506
Author(s):  
Eva Chytilova ◽  
Tamara Jemcov ◽  
Jan Malik ◽  
Jernej Pajek ◽  
Branko Fila ◽  
...  

The goal of vascular access creation is to achieve a functioning arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG). An autologous fistula has been shown to be superior to AVG or to central venous catheters (CVCs) with lowest rate of re-intervention, but vessel obstruction or immaturity accounts for 20 % to 54% of cases with primary failure of AVF. This review is focused on the factors influencing maturation; indication and timing of preoperative mapping/creation of vascular access; ultrasound parameters for creation AVF/AVG; early postoperative complications following creation of a vascular access; ultrasound determinants of fistula maturation and endovascular intervention in vascular access with maturation failure. However, vascular accesses that fail to develop, have a high incidence of correctable abnormalities, and these need to be promptly recognized by ultrasonography and managed effectively if a high success rate is to be expected. We review approaches to promoting fistula maturation and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) of evaluating vascular access maturation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 331-339
Author(s):  
Arie Bass ◽  
William C. Krupski ◽  
Stephen R. Hanson ◽  
Thomas Dodson ◽  
Alan Lumsden ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110052
Author(s):  
Jae Jin Lee ◽  
Sun Ryoung Choi ◽  
Eun Ju Lee ◽  
Ha Youn Yang ◽  
Seon Ha Baek ◽  
...  

Background: Little is known about the changes in hemodynamic parameters during arteriovenous (AV) access maturation using duplex ultrasound according to radiocephalic fistula (RCF), brachiocephalic fistula (BCF), and AV graft (AVG) in incident hemodialysis (HD) patient. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes and differences in brachial artery flow rate (BAFR) and related parameters affecting maturation by duplex ultrasound in incident HD patients according to access type. Methods: This study was an observational study conducted from March 2019 to October 2020. During the study period, 109 incident patients underwent new AV access creation, of which 100 were included in the study. The duplex ultrasound was performed on the day prior to access creation, further, day 1, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks later after access creation in incident HD patients. Results: Among all the patients, 38 (38%) received BCF, while 26 (26%) underwent RCF. Of the patients with AVG, 18 (50%) had a forearm loop AVG. The overall mean age was 62.2 ± 13.8 years (range, 32–89). The BAFR increased about 6.9 times in the RCF, 17.4 times in the BCF, and 19.5 times in the AVG at day 1. The median BAFR measured on day 1 was 580.4 mL/min for RC, 1029.0 mL/min for BC, and 1133.0 mL/min for AVG. Relative to the values measured in week 4, the BAFR on day 1 was 69.5% in RCF, 90.6% in BCF, and 93.9% in AVG. The acceleration decreased most significantly on day 1( p < 0.05). The acceleration time increased significantly on day 1 ( p < 0.05) and beyond during maturation in the RCF and BCF. The BAFR of the RCF had a significantly negative correlation with the pulsatility index. The BAFR of the BCF showed a significantly positive correlation with the systolic and diastolic blood pressure but negatively correlated with pulse rate. The BAFR of the AVG showed a significant positive correlation with the diameter of the outflow vein. Conclusions: There were differences in the clinical and duplex parameters during maturation according to access type. The most dramatic changes of duplex parameters were on the day after AV access creation regardless of AV access types. Though RCF had a lower BAFR rate compared to BCF and AVG, it already had a sufficient BAFR required for adequate HD treatment the day after creation. The BAFR of BCF was not different from that of AVG.


1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Ori ◽  
A Korzets ◽  
M Katz ◽  
Y Perek ◽  
I Zahavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Danielle T. Fontenot ◽  
Adam Tanious ◽  
Yusuf M. Chauhan ◽  
Alicia M. Stafford ◽  
Karl A. Illig

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-72
Author(s):  
Michele Di Filippo ◽  
Danilo Barbarisi ◽  
Doriana Ferrara ◽  
Stefania Brancaccio ◽  
Luca del Guercio ◽  
...  

Objectives: Vascular occlusion of hemodialysis arteriovenous access (AVA) using an Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) is an arising and alternative practice in selected patients; however, few reported cases can be found in the literature. Herein, we report on our experience with endovascular treatment of complicated AVA. Materials and Methods: From September 2015 to December 2016, 3 patients at our clinic underwent an occlusion of hemodialysis AVA with 2 different Amplatzer vascular plugs: 2 patients with type II and 1 patient with type IV. Of these, 1 patient was treated for an autologous radiocephalic fistula, the second patient was treated for an autologous brachiocephalic fistula located at the elbow, and the third was, instead, treated for a radiocephalic forearm fistula. The reason for closing the AVA in all patients was due to the presence of dialysis-associated steal syndrome with critical hand ischemia and intractable ipsilateral edema. Results: All AVAs were treated using an AVP. No plug migration, access revascularization, persistent ischemia, nor other complications were observed. Conclusion: This report suggests that the use of AVP for embolization of complicated AVA is a safe and reasonable alternative to open surgery in selected patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document