Forward lunge as a functional performance test in ACL deficient subjects: Test–retest reliability

The Knee ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Alkjær ◽  
Marius Henriksen ◽  
Poul Dyhre-Poulsen ◽  
Erik B. Simonsen
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Hansen ◽  
Nina Beyer ◽  
Anne Frølich ◽  
Nina Godtfredsen ◽  
Theresa Bieler

Abstract BackgroundIn patients with COPD the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) are widely used patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of respiratory symptoms, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Despite established responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC), reproducibility and especially important agreement parameters remain unreported in these frequently used PROMs. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-day test-retest reliability and agreement of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D in patients with severe and very severe COPD (FEV1 <50%) eligible for hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation.Patients and MethodsFifty patients (22 females, mean [SD] age 67 [9] yrs.; FEV1 32[9] %; 6-minute walk distance 347 [102] meters; CAT 21 [6] points; BMI: 26 [6] kg/m2) completed the questionnaires (CAT, CCQ, HADS, EQ-5D) in combination with functional performance test instructed by one assessor on test-day one (T1) and by another assessor 7-10 days later on test-day two (T2).ResultsThe inter-day test-retest reliability ICC was 0.88 (LL95CI: 0.80) for CAT; 0.69 (LL95CI: 0.46) for CCQ; 0.86 (LL95CI: 0.75) and 0.90 (LL95CI: 0.82) for HADS-anxiety (A) and depression (D) and 0.87 (LL95CI: 0.76) for EQ-5D-VAS. The corresponding agreements within a single measurement (standard error of measurement, SEM) and for repeated measurement errors (smallest real difference, SRD) were respectively 2.1 and 2.9 points for CAT; 0.5 and 0.7 points for CCQ total; 1.3 and 1.9 points for HADS-A; 0.9 and 1.3 points for HADS-D) and 6.8 and 9.7 VAS-score for EQ-5D respectively. Ceiling/flooring effect was present in <5% for all questionnaires. ConclusionIn patients with severe and very severe COPD the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D questionnaires presented moderate to excellent inter-day test-retest reliability and acceptable agreement e.g. SEM and SRD below the established MIC on group level except for the CCQ questionnaire. No floor or ceiling effect of relevance was documented for the questionnaires.


2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1613-1624 ◽  
Author(s):  
JONNA KUNTSI ◽  
HANNAH ROGERS ◽  
GREER SWINARD ◽  
NORBERT BÖRGER ◽  
JAAP van der MEERE ◽  
...  

Background. For candidate endophenotypes to be useful for psychiatric genetic research, they first of all need to show significant genetic influences. To address the relative lack of previous data, we set to investigate the extent of genetic and environmental influences on performance in a set of theoretically driven cognitive-experimental tasks in a large twin sample. We further aimed to illustrate how test–retest reliability of the measures affects the estimates.Method. Four-hundred 7- to 9-year-old twin pairs were assessed individually on tasks measuring reaction time, inhibition, working memory and ‘delay aversion’ performance. Test–retest reliability data on some of the key measures were available from a previous study.Results. Several key measures of reaction time, inhibition and working-memory performance indicated a moderate degree of genetic influence. Combining data across theoretically related tasks increased the heritability estimates, as illustrated by the heritability estimates of 60% for mean reaction time and 50% for reaction-time variability. Psychometric properties (reliability or ceiling effects) had a substantial influence on the estimates for some measures.Conclusions. The data support the usefulness of several of the variables for endophenotype studies that aim to link genes to cognitive and motivational processes. Importantly, the data also illustrate specific conditions under which the true extent of genetic influences may be underestimated and hence the usefulness for genetic mapping studies compromised, and suggest ways to address this.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Rodríguez-Marroyo ◽  
Javier Medina-Carrillo ◽  
Juan García-López ◽  
Juan C. Morante ◽  
José G. Villa ◽  
...  

Purpose:To analyze the concurrent and construct validity of a volleyball intermittent endurance test (VIET). The VIET’s test–retest reliability and sensitivity to assess seasonal changes was also studied.Methods:During the preseason, 71 volleyball players of different competitive levels took part in this study. All performed the VIET and a graded treadmill test with gas-exchange measurement (GXT). Thirty-one of the players performed an additional VIET to analyze the test–retest reliability. To test the VIET’s sensitivity, 28 players repeated the VIET and GXT at the end of their season.Results:Significant (P < .001) relationships between VIET distance and maximal oxygen uptake (r = .74) and GXT maximal speed (r = .78) were observed. There were no significant differences between the VIET performance test and retest (1542.1 ± 338.1 vs 1567.1 ± 358.2 m). Significant (P < .001) relationships and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were found (r = .95, ICC = .96) for VIET performance. VIET performance increased significantly (P < .001) with player performance level and was sensitive to fitness changes across the season (1458.8 ± 343.5 vs 1581.1 ± 334.0 m, P < .01).Conclusions:The VIET may be considered a valid, reliable, and sensitive test to assess the aerobic endurance in volleyball players.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Paschal ◽  
Amber R. Oswald ◽  
Robert W. Siegmund ◽  
Susan E. Siegmund ◽  
Joseph A. Threlkeld

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-552
Author(s):  
Kuan-Wei Chen ◽  
Gong-Hong Lin ◽  
Nan-Cheng Chen ◽  
Ji-Kuan Wang ◽  
Ching-Lin Hsieh

Abstract Objective The purposes of this study were to examine the practice effects and test–retest reliability of the Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs version (CPT-IP) over four serial assessments in patients with schizophrenia. Method Fifty-six patients with schizophrenia were assessed with the CPT-IP four times, once per week. The CPT-IP contains four indices: “2-digit score,” “3-digit score,” “4-digit score,” and “total score.” Results The four indices showed trivial-to-small practice effects (Cohen’s d = −0.13–0.24), good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.62–0.88), and unacceptable random measurement error (MDC% = 33.8%–110.8%). Conclusions The total score had the best reliability among the four indices. Although practice effects of the four indices all appeared cumulative, all four CPT-IP indices reached a plateau after the second assessment. These results indicate that clinicians should interpret the change scores of the CPT-IP conservatively and use the total-score index in their routine repeated assessments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie M. H. de Witte ◽  
Marco J. M. Hoozemans ◽  
Monique A. M. Berger ◽  
Rienk M. A. van der Slikke ◽  
Lucas H. V. van der Woude ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document