Limitations in predicting outcome following primary ACL reconstruction with single-bundle hamstring autograft — A systematic review

The Knee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent VG An ◽  
Corey Scholes ◽  
Vikram A Mhaskar ◽  
William J Hadden ◽  
David Parker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Predicting Outcome ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

scholarly journals One-stage Revision ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft results in satisfactory outcome

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0017
Author(s):  
Ritwik Kejriwal ◽  
Jens Buelow
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Rupture Rate ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Satisfactory Outcome ◽  
Kt 1000

Objectives: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is associated with poorer outcomes and higher rerupture rates when compared to primary ACL reconstruction. There is also a significant heterogeneity in surgical technique, number of stages, and graft options. We report a large single surgeon case series with hamstring autograft as a graft option. Methods: Observational series of revision ACL reconstructions performed by the senior author between 2005 and 2015 was carried out. Chart reviews and clinic follow-ups were performed with the following recorded – re-rupture rate, radiographic grading of osteoarthritis, KT-1000 arthrometer test, IKDC outcome scores and knee range of motion. All patients underwent single bundle four-strand hamstring autograft performed in one stage with use of new tunnels in majority of the cases. Results: 66 patients underwent hamstring autograft one-stage revision ACL reconstruction by Dr Jens Buelow. Chart review was carried out on all patients, and 26 (39%) were followed up in clinic and/or by phone with a mean follow up of 4.7 years. Outcomes included re-rupture rate of 4.5%, reoperation rate of 12%, mean visual analogue scale score of 7.6, mean side-to-side difference of 2.6 mm for KT-1000 arthrometer test, and mean IKDC score of 79. Of the 17 patients with radiographs, 40% had moderate osteoarthritis (grade 2 or 3) at follow-up. Conclusion: Revision ACL reconstruction can result in a satisfactory outcome when performed with a hamstring autograft in one stage.

scholarly journals Vancomycin presoaking of hamstring grafts removes the risk of infection in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0018
Author(s):  
Francisco Figueroa ◽  
David Figueroa ◽  
Rafael Calvo ◽  
Alex Vaisman ◽  
Mario López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Previous Period ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Hamstring Grafts

Background: Several strategies have been studied to decrease the rate of infection after hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Our group started presoaking grafts with Vancomycin in November 2015 to decrease this risk. Purpose: The objective of the study is to compare the success of this protocol against the immediate previous period in which we did not use the protocol. Study design: Retrospective cohort. Level III. Methods: Consecutive periods were studied: April 2013-October 2015 (pre Vancomycin protocol) and November 2015- May 2018 (Vancomycin protocol). All patients that underwent a hamstring autograft primary ACL reconstruction during the periods studied were included. The final outcome was the presence of postoperative septic arthritis in both groups. Diagnosis of septic arthritis was made using the clinical picture plus cytological analysis of a joint aspiration (cell count > 50.000/uL + > 90% neutrophils) Statistical analysis was made using the Fisher’s exact test. Significance was set in p < 0.05. Results: 490 patients were included in the study, 230 in the pre Vancomycin protocol an 260 in the Vancomycin protocol. 4 postoperative septic arthritis were noted in the pre Vancomycin protocol (1.7%) while no septic arthritis was noted in the post Vancomycin protocol patients during the period studied. (p < 0.05) The 4 postoperative infections were presented at an average 21.7 days (range 16-25). Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated in 2 of the cases, and in the other 2 no organism was isolated. Conclusion: Vancomycin presoaking of hamstring autografts in primary ACL reconstruction eliminated the risk of postoperative septic arthritis during the studied period compared to the immediate previous period, where no Vancomycin presoaking was used.

scholarly journals A 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Achieves Outcomes Comparable to Those of a 4-Strand Hamstring Autograft With a Graft Diameter of 8 mm or More in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596711876081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingaraj Krishna ◽  
Xin Yang Tan ◽  
Francis Keng Lin Wong ◽  
Shi Jie Toh
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Physical Component Summary ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Graft Diameter ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

Background: Quadrupled (4-strand) hamstring tendon autografts are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but there is significant variability in their diameter. The 5-strand hamstring autograft has been used as a means of increasing the graft diameter in patients with undersized hamstring grafts. Purpose: To report the outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using 5-strand hamstring autografts in patients in whom the 4-strand configuration produced a graft diameter of <8 mm and to compare these outcomes with those of ACL reconstruction using 4-strand semitendinosus-gracilis autografts with a graft diameter of ≥8 mm. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The primary study group comprised 25 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a 5-strand hamstring autograft. The comparison group comprised 20 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a 4-strand hamstring autograft with a graft diameter of ≥8 mm. Interference screw fixation was used at the tibial and femoral ends for both groups of patients. Subjective questionnaires, including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, and the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary of the Short Form–36 (SF-36), were administered preoperatively as well as at 1- and 2-year follow-up visits. Results: There were no significant differences in the patient demographics and preoperative scores between the 2 groups. The mean graft diameter was 9.06 ± 0.60 mm in the 5-strand group and 8.13 ± 0.32 mm in the 4-strand group ( P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups on postoperative Lysholm, KOOS Pain, KOOS Symptoms, KOOS Activities of Daily Living, KOOS Sports, KOOS Quality of Life, and SF-36 Physical Component Summary scores. Conclusion: In primary ACL reconstruction, the 5-strand hamstring autograft achieves clinical outcomes that are comparable to those of the 4-strand hamstring autograft with a graft diameter of ≥8 mm. The 5-strand graft technique is therefore a useful means of increasing the graft diameter when faced with an undersized hamstring graft.

scholarly journals Higher Rate of Patellofemoral Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Autograft

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 811-815
Author(s):  
Krisna Yuarno Phatama ◽  
Romy Darmawansa ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Arga Aldrian Oktafandi ◽  
Felix Cendikiawan ◽  
Alva Pribadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Peroneus Longus Tendon ◽  
Peroneus Longus ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: Patellofemoral problems are not uncommon among post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients. Hamstring autograft harvesting-related factor is one of the suspected causes. A lack of tibiofemoral internal rotation force due to strength deficit causes the patella tends to shift laterally. Purposes: Peroneus longus tendon has been proposed as an alternative graft source due to its adequate tensile strength and minimal donor site morbidity to the knee biomechanics, including the patellofemoral joint. This tendon does not cross the knee joint and thus does not affect patellofemoral alignment and biomechanics. This study aims to compare patellofemoral problems between hamstring and peroneus longus autograft harvested-patients following ACL reconstruction. Material and methods: Thirty-one subjects who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction between September 2018 and September 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were grouped into the hamstring group (n=16) and peroneus longus group (n=15). Both groups were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up assessment was conducted on the phase II rehabilitation program. The assessed variables were pain, crepitus, and the Indonesian-validated Kujala score. Results: No significant differences in pain and crepitus were found between both groups. There were significant differences in the Kujala score between both groups (P < .001). The peroneus longus group reported an averagely higher score than the hamstring group. Conclusion: Single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft produces less patellofemoral symptoms and functional limitation than using hamstring tendon autograft.

scholarly journals Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e033429
Author(s):  
Andrew Middlebrook ◽  
Sheree Bekker ◽  
Nicola Middlebrook ◽  
Alison B Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Predicting Outcome ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

IntroductionInjuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are a common musculoskeletal complication and can cause significant reduction in patient function and quality of life. Many undergo ACL reconstruction, with high-quality rehabilitation key to successful outcome. Knowledge of physical prognostic factors, such as quadriceps strength, is crucial to inform rehabilitation and has important implications for outcome following ACL reconstruction. However, these factors predicting outcome are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to establish physical prognostic factors predictive of outcome in adults following ACL reconstruction. Outcome will be subdivided into two groups of outcome measures, patient-reported and performance-based. Physical prognostic factors of interest will reflect a range of domains and may be modifiable/non-modifiable. Results will help decide most appropriate management and assist in planning and tailoring preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, key journals and grey literature will be searched from inception to July 2019. Prospective cohort studies including participants aged ≥16 years who have undergone ACL reconstruction will be included, with articles focusing on multi-ligament reconstructions and ACL repair surgery, or not published in English excluded. Two independent reviewers will conduct searches, assess study eligibility, extract data, assess risk of bias (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool) and quantify overall quality of evidence (modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines). If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted, otherwise a narrative synthesis will ensue focusing on prognostic factors, risk of bias of included studies and strength of association with outcomes.Ethics and disseminationFindings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and locally to physiotherapy departments. Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019127732.

Smaller Graft Size is Associated with Poorer Outcomes and Increased Risk of Revision 2 Years After Primary ACL Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft: A MOON Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. e146
Author(s):  
Robert A. Magnussen ◽  
Michael W. Mariscalco ◽  
Joshua Mitchell ◽  
Angela Pedroza ◽  
Morgan Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Graft Size ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

scholarly journals A Matched-pair Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes following Primary ACL Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft vs Hybrid Graft

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. e6
Author(s):  
Matthew Kraeutler ◽  
Seong Kim ◽  
Colin Brown ◽  
Darby Houck ◽  
Brian Domby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Pair Comparison ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

scholarly journals CT Based Analysis of Arthroscopic Femoral Tunnel Placement in Single Bundle Primary ACL Reconstruction Using Medial Portal Technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdul Ghaffar ◽  
Atul Agrawal ◽  
Rajesh Maheshwari ◽  
Shailender Raghuvanshi
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Tunnel Placement ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Placement ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Portal Technique

Five-Strand Hamstring Autograft in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (04) ◽  
pp. 366-371
Author(s):  
Lingaraj Krishna ◽  
Xin Yang Tan ◽  
Acksen Thangaraja ◽  
Francis Wong
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Hamstring Graft ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Interference Screw Fixation ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Graft Diameter ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to describe our surgical technique of using five-strand hamstring autograft with interference screw fixation in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to report the early postoperative outcomes of this technique. Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using five-strand hamstring autografts with interference screw fixation between December 2014 and June 2016 were included in this study. The five-strand configuration was used in these patients because the four-strand configuration produced a graft diameter of less than 8 mm. Subjective questionnaires, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Lysholm Score, were administered preoperatively, as well as at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Paired t-test was used to compare the pre- and postoperative outcome scores. The study group comprised 25 patients. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean follow-up period was 17.8 months (12–24). There were 19 males and 6 females. The median age was 24 years (16–41), and median body mass index was 23.9 (18.5–30.2). The median diameter of the five-strand graft was 9 mm (8–10 mm), with a mean of 9.06 ± 0.60 mm. This was associated with a median graft length of 90 mm (80–100 mm). The postoperative Lysholm, KOOS symptoms, KOOS Pain, KOOS daily function, KOOS sports function, KOOS quality of life, and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative scores. The use of the five-strand hamstring graft with interference screw fixation in primary ACL reconstruction is associated with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes in the early postoperative period. The five-strand graft technique is a useful means of increasing graft diameter when faced with an undersized hamstring graft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document