EUTOS score predicts long-term outcome but not optimal response to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1457-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Tiribelli ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Elisabetta Calistri ◽  
Gianni Binotto ◽  
Elena Maino ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 173 (6) ◽  
pp. 945-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Gioia Colafigli ◽  
Matteo Molica ◽  
Federico De Angelis ◽  
Luisa Quattrocchi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Molica ◽  
Irene Zacheo ◽  
Daniela Diverio ◽  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
Massimo Breccia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (24) ◽  
pp. 2001-2005
Author(s):  
Irom Anil Singh ◽  
Aditi Jain ◽  
Pukhrambam Vedanti Devi ◽  
Tombing Niangneihching

BACKGROUND Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) accounts for 15 - 20 % of leukemia in adults worldwide. At present, the three tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib are accepted as the standard first-line treatment in chronic phase (CP). Nilotinib is a second generation TKI having faster and deeper response compared to imatinib. We wanted to see if the response achieved with nilotinib in the first three months could be translated into long term benefits when imatinib was given after 3 months. METHODS Newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were randomized into two arms. The patients on the first arm were given imatinib and in the second arm nilotinib was given for first 3 months. After three months nilotinib was switched over to imatinib. The molecular response was assessed in both arms at 3 months and 6 months. RESULTS Twenty-six patients in each arm were analysed. The optimal molecular response (QPCR <10 %) after 3 months was significantly higher in patients receiving nilotinib than imatinib (96.1 % vs 65.38 %; P < 0.0048). The optimal response after 6 months (QPCR < 1 %) was found to be more in the initial nilotinib arm than the initial imatinib arm (76.9 % vs 65.3 %; P - value = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS Patients on nilotinib arm did well even after switching to imatinib. It gives us an important platform for an economically backward country like India where the therapy with more potent drug like nilotinib is given in the initial three months or even six months. KEYWORDS Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia, Imatinib, Nilotinib, Optimal Response, Major Molecular Response


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024
Author(s):  
Mario Tiribelli ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Gianni Binotto ◽  
Elisabetta Calistri ◽  
Elena Maino ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction One of the most significant novelty of the revised version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is that an earlier achievement of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), at 6 months, and major molecular response (MMR), at 12 months, is regarded as optimal. Moreover, the prognostic value of the depth of molecular response at three months (i.e. BCR-ABL/ABL ratio ≤10%) is recognized. We have previously reported that EUTOS score is able to predict long term outcome of imatinib therapy, and that high-risk patients had a non-statistically significant lower probability to achieve all the cytogenetic and molecular endpoints defined as optimal by 2009 ELN recommendations. Aims and Methods We retrospectively evaluated our cohort of CML patients treated with front-line standard dose imatinib to test the ability of EUTOS and Sokal scores to foresee 2013 ELN-defined optimal response to therapy. A total of 314 consecutive patients treated with imatinib 400 mg daily for early chronic phase CML were analysed. Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range: 19-85 years). According to the Sokal score there were 133 (42%) low risk, 127 (40%) intermediate risk, 52 (17%) high risk and 2 (1%) unknown risk cases, respectively. The distribution according to the EUTOS score was: 289 patients (92%) in the low-risk and 25 (8%) in the high-risk group. Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) and CCyR were defined as 1-35% and 0% Ph+ metaphases, respectively; major molecular response (MMR) was defined as BCR-ABL <0.1%IS. For the purposes of this analysis, and as suggested by the ELN experts, we divided patients into low and high risk also according to Sokal score, thus considering low and intermediate risk as one group. Results Considering EUTOS score, at the 3 months timepoint we observed a significant higher rate of optimal molecular response (≤10%) in low risk (76%) compared to high risk (52%, p=0.03) patients, while there was a only trend for cytogenetic response (Ph+ ≤35%) (86% vs 75%, p=0.20). At 6 months, both cytogenetic (CCyR) and molecular (≤1%) optimal responses were higher in the low risk group: 76% vs 46% (p=0.003) and 67% vs 33% (p=0.004), respectively. At 12 months, 58% of low risk patients were in MMR, compared to 41% in the high risk group (p=0.20). Dividing patients according to Sokal score in two groups of intermediate-low (n=260) and high (n=52) risk, we found a significant difference in the rates of cytogenetic response both at 3 (88% vs 72%, p=0.03) and at 6 (79% vs 48%, p=0.0001) months, while no significant differences were seen in molecular response at 3 (76% vs 62% p=0.13), 6 (67% vs 50%, p=0.08) or 12 (56% vs 55%, p=1.00) months. Conclusions Our results suggest that EUTOS score is able to predict optimal response to imatinib, in particular achievement of molecular response at 3 months, a marker of emerging importance in foreseeing long-term outcome, and of CCyR at 6 months, that has been associated with superior progression-free and overall survival. Sokal score predict sensibly cytogenetic responses, but seems less efficacious in identifying patients that will achieve optimal molecular endpoints. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A624-A624 ◽  
Author(s):  
J ARTS ◽  
M ZEEGERS ◽  
G DHAENS ◽  
G VANASSCHE ◽  
M HIELE ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document