Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 2097-2101 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Djebbar ◽  
B. Serier ◽  
B. Bachir Bouiadjra ◽  
S. Benbarek ◽  
A. Drai
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Marcos Silveira ◽  
Larissa Campaner ◽  
Marco Bottino ◽  
Renato Nishioka ◽  
Alexandre Borges ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
Rafael Imai Carli ◽  
Rosse Mary Falcón-Antenucci ◽  
Fellippo Ramos Verri ◽  
Marcelo Coelho Goiato ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution with different implant systems through photoelasticity. Five models were fabricated with photoelastic resin PL-2. Each model was composed of a block of photoelastic resin (10 × 40 × 45 mm) with an implant and a healing abutment: model 1, internal hexagon implant (4.0 × 10 mm; Conect AR, Conexão, São Paulo, Brazil); model 2, Morse taper/internal octagon implant (4.1 × 10 mm; Standard, Straumann ITI, Andover, Mass); model 3, Morse taper implant (4.0 × 10 mm; AR Morse, Conexão); model 4, locking taper implant (4.0 × 11 mm; Bicon, Boston, Mass); model 5, external hexagon implant (4.0 × 10 mm; Master Screw, Conexão). Axial and oblique load (45°) of 150 N were applied by a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL 3000), and a circular polariscope was used to visualize the stress. The results were photographed and analyzed qualitatively using Adobe Photoshop software. For the axial load, the greatest stress concentration was exhibited in the cervical and apical thirds. However, the highest number of isochromatic fringes was observed in the implant apex and in the cervical adjacent to the load direction in all models for the oblique load. Model 2 (Morse taper, internal octagon, Straumann ITI) presented the lowest stress concentration, while model 5 (external hexagon, Master Screw, Conexão) exhibited the greatest stress. It was concluded that Morse taper implants presented a more favorable stress distribution among the test groups. The external hexagon implant showed the highest stress concentration. Oblique load generated the highest stress in all models analyzed.


Author(s):  
N. Jayakumar ◽  
G. Senthilkumar ◽  
S. Vigneshwaran ◽  
K.G. Ajay Kumar

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Achour ◽  
A. Merdji ◽  
B. Bachir Bouiadjra ◽  
B. Serier ◽  
N. Djebbar

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi KITAGAWA ◽  
Yasuhiro TANIMOTO ◽  
Kimiya NEMOTO ◽  
Masahiro AIDA

Author(s):  
Majid Ghadiri ◽  
Navvab Shafiei ◽  
Sadegh Hemmati Salekdeh ◽  
Parya Mottaghi ◽  
Tahereh Mirzaie

2014 ◽  
Vol 606 ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
Dušan Németh ◽  
Ján Kučera ◽  
František Lofaj ◽  
Vladimír Ivančo

The aim of this work is the modeling of the stress distribution in cortical and trabecular bone of model frontal part of mandible by FEM analysis using linear static methods applying monocortical and bicortical fixation of dental implant. Depending on the position of the screw thread with regard to the bone surface, three different cases were simulated: exactly on the bone surface, 1,5 mm above and 0,5 mm below the surface of the cortical bone. It was found out that the stress field in the cortical part and the implant are considerably lower in the case of slightly recessed position in contrast with the above and normal position of the implant in both, monocortical and bicortical fixations. However, bicortical fixation in this case generates slightly lower stress field in the bone and implant parts than in monocortical fixation. Monocortical fixation is otherwise slightly more favorable from the viewpoint of maximum stresses in the bone in the case of exact and above positions of the implant.


Author(s):  
Denis Romanov ◽  
Kirill Sosnin ◽  
Artem Filyakov ◽  
Sergey Nevskii ◽  
Stanislav Moskovskii

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document