Comparative analysis between numerical simulation of PPV/PCBM and InGaN based solar cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 168-173
Author(s):  
Mohammad Asif Iqbal ◽  
Sunil Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Solar Cells ◽  
Comparative Analysis

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECENT HIGH-EFFICIENCY CdTe SOLAR CELLS

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. SASALA ◽  
X. X. LIU ◽  
J. R. SITES
Keyword(s):  
Solar Cells ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Cdte Solar Cells

Numerical Simulation of Shock Wave in Air Based on FCT Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 397-400 ◽  
pp. 270-273
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Xiao Bin Li ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Wei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Numerical Method ◽  
Blast Wave ◽  
Empirical Formula ◽  
Godunov Method ◽  
Numerical Accuracy

Blast wave is numerical simulated based on FCT method. According to the comparative analysis, taking Henrych empirical formula as a standard, FCT method is more accuracy than Godunov method. Moreover, it has been found that the numerical accuracy is insufficient when the distance is small, it is necessary to develop and modify the numerical method continuously.

Numerical simulation of Ge solar cells using D-AMPS-1D code

2012 ◽  
Vol 407 (16) ◽  
pp. 3282-3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Barrera ◽  
Francisco Rubinelli ◽  
Ignacio Rey-Stolle ◽  
Juan Plá
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Solar Cells

scholarly journals Numerical Simulation of a Textured and Untextured Photovoltaic Solar Cell: Comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 104-114
Author(s):  
Karim Salim ◽  
◽  
M.N Amroun ◽  
K Sahraoui ◽  
W Azzoui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Solar Cells ◽  
Solar Cell ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Silicon Solar Cell ◽  
The Other ◽  
Surface Parameters ◽  
Cell Efficiency ◽  
Photovoltaic Solar Cell ◽  
A Cell

Increasing the efficiency of solar cells relies on the surface of the solar cell. In this work, we simulated a textured silicon solar cell. This simulation allowed us to predict the values of the surface parameters such as the angle and depth between the pyramids for an optimal photovoltaic conversion where we found the Icc: 1.783 (A) and Vco: 0.551 (V) with a cell efficiency of about 13.56%. On the other hand, we performed another simulation of a non-textured solar cell to compare our values and found Icc: 1.623 (A) and Vco: 0.556 (V) with an efficiency of about 12.76%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document