A comparative study on solar dryer using external reflector for drying grapes

Author(s):  
P. Leon Dharmadurai ◽  
S. Vasanthaseelan ◽  
R. Bharathwaaj ◽  
Vijayakumar Dharmaraj ◽  
K. Gnanasekaran ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1276 ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
Sendhil Kumar Natarajan ◽  
K. Sankaranarayanasamy ◽  
Sindhuja Ponnusamy ◽  
Velaga Kavya Chowdary ◽  
Jitender Kumar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. A. Okaiyeto ◽  
Nathaniel Oji ◽  
Y. A. Unguwanrimi

A comparative study of three drying methods of baobab leaves have been conducted and reported. Mixed mode solar drying, indirect mode solar drying and open sun drying of baobab leaves were conducted based on three drying models viz a viz Lewis,. Page and Henderson and Pabis models were employed in this research. Baobab leaves dried faster when dried under the mixed mode on-farm solar dryer. Drying time reduced considerably using the mixed mode on-farm solar dryer. Drying data were fitted into Lewis, Page and Henderson and Pabis models. Henderson and Pabis model (R2=0.9999, 0.9611, 0.9656; X2= 1.0297, 0.7931, 0.7710; RMSE= 0.5859, 0.6898, 0.6802 and MBE= -0.4.135, -0.4.231, -0.4176) gave the best prediction for the mixed mode drying). In the same way Henderson and Pabis model (R2=0.7450, 0.7699, 0.8243; X2= 1.9025, 0.4026, 0.2006; RMSE= 1.0684, 0.5181, 0.4058 and MBE= -0.8966, -0.3823, 0.2789) gave the best prediction for the indirect mode drying of baobab leaves. Effective moisture diffusivity of baobab leaves varied between -6.382 X 10-04 and -1.108 X 10-03 m2/s.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

2001 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1748
Author(s):  
Aitor Hierro ◽  
Jesus M. Arizmendi ◽  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
M. Angeles Urbaneja ◽  
Adelina Prado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document