Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Francisella tularensis DNA from spiked soil samples

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris A. Whitehouse ◽  
Hannah E. Hottel
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jarosz ◽  
Jean-Francois Durant ◽  
Leonid Mwana Wa Bene Irenge ◽  
Renata Fogt-Wyrwas ◽  
Hanna Mizgajska-Wiktor ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati are globally distributed roundworms and causative agents of human toxocariasis, via ingestion of Toxocara eggs. Control of Toxocara infections is constrained by a lack of sensitive methods for screening of animal faeces and environmental samples potentially contaminated by Toxocara eggs. In this work, a pre-analytical method for efficient extraction of DNA from Toxocara eggs in environmental samples was set up using our previously validated T. canis- and T. cati-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). For this purpose, the influence of different methods for egg lysis, DNA extraction and purification for removal of PCR inhibitors were assessed on environmental samples. Methods To select the best egg disruption method, six protocols were compared on pure T. canis egg suspensions, including enzymatic lysis and thermal or mechanical disruption. Based on the selected best method, an analytical workflow was set up to compare two DNA extraction methods (FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil versus DNeasy® PowerMax® Soil Kit) with an optional dilution and/or clean-up (Agencourt® AMPure®) step. This workflow was evaluated on 10-g soil and 10-g sand samples spiked with egg suspensions of T. canis (tenfold dilutions of 104 eggs in triplicate). The capacity of the different methods, used alone or in combination, to increase the ratio of positive tests was assessed. The resulting optimal workflow for processing spiked soil samples was then tested on environmental soil samples and compared with the conventional flotation-centrifugation and microscopic examination of Toxocara eggs. Results The most effective DNA extraction method for Toxocara eggs in soil samples consisted in the combination of mechanical lysis of eggs using beads, followed by DNA extraction with the DNeasy® PowerMax® Soil Kit, and completed with an additional DNA clean-up step with AMPure® beads and a sample DNA dilution (1:10). This workflow exhibited a limit of detection of 4 and 46 T.canis eggs in 10-g sand and 10-g soil samples, respectively. Conclusions The pre-analytical flow process developed here combined with qPCR represents an improved, potentially automatable, and cost-effective method for the surveillance of Toxocara contamination in the environment. Graphical Abstract


2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricela Sellek ◽  
Oscar Jimenez ◽  
Carmen Aizpurua ◽  
Begoña Fernandez-Frutos ◽  
Patricia De Leon ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Ljubomirova ◽  
Rumyana Djingova ◽  
Johannes T. van Elteren ◽  
Marjan Veber ◽  
Tomasz Kowalkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Acta Tropica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 105175
Author(s):  
Justine Daudi Maganira ◽  
Beda John Mwang'onde ◽  
Winifrida Kidima ◽  
Chacha John Mwita ◽  
Gamba Nkwengulila ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Young ◽  
Nicolas J. Rawlence ◽  
Laura S. Weyrich ◽  
Alan Cooper
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Babic ◽  
Marija Kastelan-Macan ◽  
Mira Petrovic

Quantitative determination of combinations of the agrochemicals: atrazine, propham, chlorpropham, diflubenzuron, α-cypermethrin and tetramethrin from spiked soil is reported. Method involves ultrasonic extraction of agrochemicals with acetone, separation of samples by means of reverse-phase thin-layer chromatography and quantification by slit-scanning densitometry. Computer-assisted optimisation was used to select the optimum mobile phase composition. Apparent recoveries of agrochemicals from spiked soil were: 90.3±8.5 for chlorpropham, 79.3±10.3 for propham, 102±2.4 for atrazine, 100.6±5.4 for α-cypermethrin, 103.0±4.1 for tetramethrin and 98.3±4.9 for diflubenzuron.


2006 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1403-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radoslav Halko ◽  
Carolina PadrÓn Sanz ◽  
Zoraida Sosa Ferrera ◽  
JosÉ Juan Santana RodrÍguez

Abstract A simple and fast analytical method was developed for the determination of benzimidazole fungicides (benomyl, carbendazim, thiabendazole, and fuberidazole) in soil samples. The analytes were extracted from the soil samples by means of conventional microwave-assisted extraction, using the non-ionic surfactants polyoxyethylene 10 lauryl ether (POLE) and oligoethylene glycol monooalkyl ether (Genapol X-080) as extractants. Determinations were made by using liquid chromatography with direct fluorescence detection. The use of an analytical column Symmetry C-18 offered short retention times of analytes without the need of any pH regulators with mobile phase methanolwater (50 + 50, v/v). The best results were obtained using 5% (v/v) POLE as extractant with recoveries of the fungicides in spiked soil samples between 71 and 105%. The results were compared with those obtained when Soxhlet extraction was applied to the same soil samples.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingchang Hu ◽  
Zhiheng Liu ◽  
Jianfang Yan ◽  
Xiaohui Qi ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (15) ◽  
pp. 3271-3286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Morais ◽  
Oriza Tavares ◽  
Paula C. Baptista‐Paíga ◽  
Cristina Delerue‐Matos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document