scholarly journals Deeply-supervised density regression for automatic cell counting in microscopy images

2021 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 101892
Author(s):  
Shenghua He ◽  
Kyaw Thu Minn ◽  
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel ◽  
Mark A. Anastasio ◽  
Hua Li
Author(s):  
Yue Guo ◽  
Oleh Krupa ◽  
Jason Stein ◽  
Guorong Wu ◽  
Ashok Krishnamurthy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuang Zhu ◽  
Zhao Chen ◽  
Yuxin Zheng ◽  
Qinghua Zhang ◽  
Xuan Wang

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilida Suleymanova ◽  
Tamas Balassa ◽  
Sushil Tripathi ◽  
Csaba Molnar ◽  
Mart Saarma ◽  
...  

AbstractAstrocytes are involved in brain pathologies such as trauma or stroke, neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, chronic pain, and many others. Determining cell density and timing of morphological and biochemical changes is important for a proper understanding of the role of astrocytes in physiological and pathological conditions. One of the most important of such analyses is astrocytes count within a complex tissue environment in microscopy images. The most widely used approaches for the quantification of microscopy images data are either manual stereological cell counting or semi-automatic segmentation techniques. Detecting astrocytes automatically is a highly challenging computational task, for which we currently lack efficient image analysis tools. In this study, we developed a fast and fully automated software that assesses the number of astrocytes using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN). The method highly outperforms state-of-the-art image analysis and machine learning methods and provides detection accuracy and precision comparable to that of human experts. Additionally, the runtime of cell detection is significantly less than other three analyzed computational methods, and it is faster than human observers by orders of magnitude. We applied DCNN-based method to examine the number of astrocytes in different brain regions of rats with opioid-induced hyperalgesia/tolerance (OIH/OIT) as morphine tolerance is believed to activate glial cells in the brain. We observed strong positive correlation between manual cell detection and DCNN-based analysis method for counting astrocytes in the brains of experimental animals.


Author(s):  
Shenghua He ◽  
Kyaw T. Minn ◽  
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel ◽  
Mark Anastasio ◽  
Hua Li

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdinei Luís Belini ◽  
Orides Morandin Junior ◽  
Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini ◽  
Philipp Wiedemann ◽  
Hajo Suhr

Abstract Background: The automatic segmentation of pseudohyphal cell-aggregates from brightfield microscopy images for counting forming cells is a challenging task due to the heterogeneous optical appearances of the cells as they may lie on different focal planes. The current cell counting method is based on a time-consuming manual counting of stained cells on a hemocytometer and in most cases, it represents estimates of low statistical significance due to the effort needed to prepare and analyze many samples. In this work, we evaluated the effectiveness of a marker-controlled watershed algorithm for automatic segmentation of pseudohyphae from brightfield microscopic images. The cell heterogeneity problem was addressed by processing intracellular contents of focused and defocused cells to extract initial foreground markers for the watershed method. By properly segmenting cells of different classes within a pseudohypha allows increasing the number of cells analyzed contributing thus to more reliable estimates. To facilitate the evaluation of the proposal by acquiring images containing a diversity of cells´ appearances, we utilized in situ microscopy, an imaging system used to capture images directly from suspensions.Results: The performance of the method was evaluated on 120 portraits of a yeast exhibiting a diversity of pseudohyphal morphologies. Automatic results were compared with manual references obtained by visual inspection of the images. Despite the simultaneous occurrence of a representative mixture of focused, over-, and under-focused cells, the method produced robust results with an average segmentation sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 76%, 89%, and 76%, respectively. On average, each microscopic image was processed within 3 s.Conclusions: Our approach was capable to segment pseudohyphae formed by cells exhibiting a large diversity of appearances. The application of a marker-controlled watershed algorithm as a simple, yet effective technique for segmenting pseudohyphae demonstrated satisfactory overall performance to support automated analysis of pseudohyphal cell-aggregates from brightfield images.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Antonets ◽  
Nikolai Russkikh ◽  
Antoine Sanchez ◽  
Victoria Kovalenko ◽  
Elvira Bairamova ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe in vitro cellular models are promising tools for studying normal and pathological conditions. One of their important applications is the development of genetically engineered biosensor systems to investigate the processes occurring in living cells in real time. Today, there are fluorescence protein based sensory systems for detecting various substances in living cells (for example, hydrogen peroxide, ATP, Ca2+ etc.) or for detecting processes such as endoplasmic reticulum stress. Such systems help to study mechanisms underlying the pathogenic processes and diseases and for screening potential therapeutic compounds. It is also necessary to develop new tools for processing and analysis of obtained microimages. Here we present our web-application CellCountCV for automation of microscopy cell images analysis which is based on fully-convolutional deep neural networks. This approach can efficiently deal with non-convex overlapping objects, that are virtually inseparable with conventional image processing methods. The cell counts predicted with CellCountCV were very close to expert estimates (the average error rate was < 4%). CellCountCV was used to analyse large series of microscopy images obtained in experimental studies and it was able to demonstrate the endoplasmic reticulum stress development and to catch the dose-dependent effect of tunicamycin.


2018 ◽  
Vol 271 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. FLIGHT ◽  
G. LANDINI ◽  
I.B. STYLES ◽  
R.M. SHELTON ◽  
M.R. MILWARD ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document