Radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography of the supra-aortic arteries: A comparison between single-source and dual-source CT Scanners

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Saba ◽  
Michele di Martino ◽  
Paolo Siotto ◽  
Michele Anzidei ◽  
Giovanni Maria Argiolas ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 2712-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Abdellatif ◽  
Eric Esslinger ◽  
Kevin Kobes ◽  
Amanda Wong ◽  
Jennifer Powell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Forbrig ◽  
Michael Ingrisch ◽  
Robert Stahl ◽  
Katharina Stella Winter ◽  
Maximilian Reiser ◽  
...  

Abstract In this third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) study, we retrospectively investigated radiation dose and image quality of portal-venous high-pitch emergency CT in 60 patients (28 female, mean age 56 years) with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2. Patients were dichotomized in groups A (median BMI 31.5 kg/m2; n = 33) and B (36.8 kg/m2; n = 27). Volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and dose-independent figure-of-merit (FOM) CNR were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed using a five-point scale. Mean values of CTDIvol, SSDE as well as normalized DLP and ED were 7.6 ± 1.8 mGy, 8.0 ± 1.8 mGy, 304 ± 74 mGy * cm and 5.2 ± 1.3 mSv for group A, and 12.6 ± 3.7 mGy, 11.0 ± 2.6 mGy, 521 ± 157 mGy * cm and 8.9 ± 2.7 mSv for group B (p < 0.001). CNR of the liver and spleen as well as each calculated FOM CNR were significantly higher in group A (p < 0.001). Subjective image quality was good in both groups. In conclusion, third-generation abdominal high-pitch emergency DSCT yields good image quality in obese patients. Radiation dose increases in patients with a BMI > 36.8 kg/m2.


2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Blankstein ◽  
Amar Shah ◽  
Rodrigo Pale ◽  
Suhny Abbara ◽  
Hiram Bezerra ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 642-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
Andrew D. Hardie ◽  
U. Joseph Schoepf ◽  
Lloyd M. Felmly ◽  
Jonathan D. Perry ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bernhard Petritsch ◽  
Aleksander Kosmala ◽  
Tobias Gassenmaier ◽  
Andreas Weng ◽  
Simon Veldhoen ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare radiation dose, subjective and objective image quality of 3 rd generation dual-source CT (DSCT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) with conventional 64-slice single-source CT (SSCT) for pulmonary CTA. Materials and Methods 180 pulmonary CTA studies were performed in three patient cohorts of 60 patients each. Group 1: conventional SSCT 120 kV (ref.); group 2: single-energy DSCT 100 kV (ref.); group 3: DECT 90/Sn150 kV. CTDIvol, DLP, effective radiation dose were reported, and CT attenuation (HU) was measured on three central and peripheral levels. The signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. Two readers assessed subjective image quality according to a five-point scale. Results Mean CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower in the dual-energy group compared to the SSCT group (p < 0.001 [CTDIvol]; p < 0.001 [DLP]) and the DSCT group (p = 0.003 [CTDIvol]; p = 0.003 [DLP]), respectively. The effective dose in the DECT group was 2.79 ± 0.95 mSv and significantly smaller than in the SSCT group (4.60 ± 1.68 mSv, p < 0.001) and the DSCT group (4.24 ± 2.69 mSv, p = 0.003). The SNR and CNR were significantly higher in the DSCT group (p < 0.001). Subjective image quality did not differ significantly among the three protocols and was rated good to excellent in 75 % (135/180) of cases with an inter-observer agreement of 80 %. Conclusion Dual-energy pulmonary CTA protocols of 3 rd generation dual-source scanners allow for significant reduction of radiation dose while providing excellent image quality and potential additional information by means of perfusion maps. Key Points: Citation Format


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document